Electronic cigarettes and subsequent cigarette smoking in young people: A systematic review

IF 5.3 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Addiction Pub Date : 2025-01-30 DOI:10.1111/add.16773
Rachna Begh, Monserrat Conde, Thomas R. Fanshawe, Dylan Kneale, Lion Shahab, Sufen Zhu, Michael Pesko, Jonathan Livingstone-Banks, Nicola Lindson, Nancy A. Rigotti, Kate Tudor, Dimitra Kale, Sarah E. Jackson, Karen Rees, Jamie Hartmann-Boyce
{"title":"Electronic cigarettes and subsequent cigarette smoking in young people: A systematic review","authors":"Rachna Begh,&nbsp;Monserrat Conde,&nbsp;Thomas R. Fanshawe,&nbsp;Dylan Kneale,&nbsp;Lion Shahab,&nbsp;Sufen Zhu,&nbsp;Michael Pesko,&nbsp;Jonathan Livingstone-Banks,&nbsp;Nicola Lindson,&nbsp;Nancy A. Rigotti,&nbsp;Kate Tudor,&nbsp;Dimitra Kale,&nbsp;Sarah E. Jackson,&nbsp;Karen Rees,&nbsp;Jamie Hartmann-Boyce","doi":"10.1111/add.16773","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aims</h3>\n \n <p>To assess the evidence for a relationship between the use of e-cigarettes and subsequent smoking in young people (≤29 years), and whether this differs by demographic characteristics.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Systematic review with association direction plots (searches to April 2023). Screening, data extraction and critical appraisal followed Cochrane methods. Our primary outcome was the association between e-cigarette use, availability or both, and change in population rate of smoking in young people. The secondary outcomes were initiation, progression and cessation of smoking at individual level. We assessed certainty using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>We included 126 studies. For our primary outcome, there was very low certainty evidence (limited by risk of bias and inconsistency) suggesting that e-cigarette use and availability were inversely associated with smoking in young people (i.e. as e-cigarettes became more available and/or used more widely, youth smoking rates went down or, conversely, as e-cigarettes were restricted, youth smoking rates went up). All secondary outcomes were judged to be very low certainty due to very serious risk of bias. Data consistently showed direct associations between vaping at baseline and smoking initiation (28 studies) and smoking progression (5 studies). The four studies contributing data on smoking cessation had mixed results, precluding drawing any conclusion on the direction of association. There was limited information to determine whether relationships varied by sociodemographic characteristics.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>At an individual level, people who vape appear to be more likely to go on to smoke than people who do not vape; however, it is unclear if these behaviours are causally linked. Very low certainty evidence suggests that youth vaping and smoking could be inversely related.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":109,"journal":{"name":"Addiction","volume":"120 6","pages":"1090-1111"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/add.16773","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Addiction","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/add.16773","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims

To assess the evidence for a relationship between the use of e-cigarettes and subsequent smoking in young people (≤29 years), and whether this differs by demographic characteristics.

Methods

Systematic review with association direction plots (searches to April 2023). Screening, data extraction and critical appraisal followed Cochrane methods. Our primary outcome was the association between e-cigarette use, availability or both, and change in population rate of smoking in young people. The secondary outcomes were initiation, progression and cessation of smoking at individual level. We assessed certainty using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE).

Results

We included 126 studies. For our primary outcome, there was very low certainty evidence (limited by risk of bias and inconsistency) suggesting that e-cigarette use and availability were inversely associated with smoking in young people (i.e. as e-cigarettes became more available and/or used more widely, youth smoking rates went down or, conversely, as e-cigarettes were restricted, youth smoking rates went up). All secondary outcomes were judged to be very low certainty due to very serious risk of bias. Data consistently showed direct associations between vaping at baseline and smoking initiation (28 studies) and smoking progression (5 studies). The four studies contributing data on smoking cessation had mixed results, precluding drawing any conclusion on the direction of association. There was limited information to determine whether relationships varied by sociodemographic characteristics.

Conclusion

At an individual level, people who vape appear to be more likely to go on to smoke than people who do not vape; however, it is unclear if these behaviours are causally linked. Very low certainty evidence suggests that youth vaping and smoking could be inversely related.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
电子烟和随后的年轻人吸烟:一项系统综述。
目的:评估年轻人(≤29岁)使用电子烟与随后吸烟之间关系的证据,以及这种关系是否因人口统计学特征而异。方法:采用关联方向图进行系统评价(检索至2023年4月)。筛选、数据提取和关键评价采用Cochrane方法。我们的主要结果是电子烟的使用、可获得性或两者之间的关系,以及年轻人吸烟率的变化。次要结果是个体水平的开始、进展和戒烟。我们使用推荐、评估、发展和评估分级(GRADE)来评估确定性。结果:我们纳入了126项研究。对于我们的主要结果,有非常低的确定性证据(受偏见和不一致风险的限制)表明电子烟的使用和可获得性与年轻人吸烟呈负相关(即随着电子烟变得更容易获得和/或使用更广泛,青少年吸烟率下降,相反,随着电子烟受到限制,青少年吸烟率上升)。由于非常严重的偏倚风险,所有次要结局被判定为非常低的确定性。数据一致显示,基线时吸电子烟与开始吸烟(28项研究)和吸烟进展(5项研究)之间存在直接关联。提供戒烟数据的四项研究的结果好坏参半,无法得出任何有关相关方向的结论。确定关系是否因社会人口特征而变化的信息有限。结论:在个人层面上,吸电子烟的人似乎比不吸的人更有可能继续吸烟;然而,目前尚不清楚这些行为是否有因果关系。非常低确定性的证据表明,青少年吸电子烟和吸烟可能呈负相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Addiction
Addiction 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
10.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
319
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Addiction publishes peer-reviewed research reports on pharmacological and behavioural addictions, bringing together research conducted within many different disciplines. Its goal is to serve international and interdisciplinary scientific and clinical communication, to strengthen links between science and policy, and to stimulate and enhance the quality of debate. We seek submissions that are not only technically competent but are also original and contain information or ideas of fresh interest to our international readership. We seek to serve low- and middle-income (LAMI) countries as well as more economically developed countries. Addiction’s scope spans human experimental, epidemiological, social science, historical, clinical and policy research relating to addiction, primarily but not exclusively in the areas of psychoactive substance use and/or gambling. In addition to original research, the journal features editorials, commentaries, reviews, letters, and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Contingency management interventions for substance use and addictive behaviours: Review of the United Kingdom evidence base. Social cognition in Korsakoff's syndrome: A meta-analysis. Heated tobacco product use and tobacco abstinence: A prospective cohort study. Examining changes in the prevalence of cost-motivated alcohol reduction attempts in the context of a cost-of-living crisis and alcohol duty reforms: A population survey of risky drinkers in Great Britain, 2021-2024. Motivational smoking cessation counselling and community-based follow-up after hospitalisation for vascular disease: A randomised controlled trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1