Revisiting the Effect of Trypsin Digestion Buffers on Artificial Deamidation.

IF 2.7 2区 化学 Q2 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry Pub Date : 2025-03-05 Epub Date: 2025-01-31 DOI:10.1021/jasms.4c00389
Emmajay Sutherland, Tim S Veth, Nicholas M Riley
{"title":"Revisiting the Effect of Trypsin Digestion Buffers on Artificial Deamidation.","authors":"Emmajay Sutherland, Tim S Veth, Nicholas M Riley","doi":"10.1021/jasms.4c00389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Deamidation of asparagine and glutamine residues occurs spontaneously, is influenced by pH, temperature, and incubation time, and can be accelerated by adjacent amino acid residues. Incubation conditions used for proteolytic digestion in bottom-up proteomic studies can induce significant deamidation that affects results, either knowingly or unknowingly. This has prompted studies into modifications to common trypsin digestion protocols to minimize chemical deamidation, including shorter incubation times and specific lysis buffers. Prior work suggested ammonium acetate at pH 6 to minimize chemical deamidation, but this buffer has compatibility issues with trypsin digestion and common assays (e.g., bicinchoninic acid assays). Here, we re-evaluated former comparisons of Tris-HCl, ammonium bicarbonate, and triethylammonium bicarbonate buffers for the amount of artificial, chemically induced deamidation generated in a standard bottom-up proteomics workflow, and we added an evaluation of three commonly used and biologically compatible buffers, HEPES (4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid), EPPS (3-[4-(2-Hydroxyethyl)piperazin-1-yl]propane-1-sulfonic acid), and PBS (phosphate buffered saline). Our findings show that HEPES exhibited the least amount of artificial deamidation and is a reasonable choice for general proteomic experiments, especially for studies considering N-glycosylation.</p>","PeriodicalId":672,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry","volume":" ","pages":"457-462"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12124135/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1021/jasms.4c00389","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Deamidation of asparagine and glutamine residues occurs spontaneously, is influenced by pH, temperature, and incubation time, and can be accelerated by adjacent amino acid residues. Incubation conditions used for proteolytic digestion in bottom-up proteomic studies can induce significant deamidation that affects results, either knowingly or unknowingly. This has prompted studies into modifications to common trypsin digestion protocols to minimize chemical deamidation, including shorter incubation times and specific lysis buffers. Prior work suggested ammonium acetate at pH 6 to minimize chemical deamidation, but this buffer has compatibility issues with trypsin digestion and common assays (e.g., bicinchoninic acid assays). Here, we re-evaluated former comparisons of Tris-HCl, ammonium bicarbonate, and triethylammonium bicarbonate buffers for the amount of artificial, chemically induced deamidation generated in a standard bottom-up proteomics workflow, and we added an evaluation of three commonly used and biologically compatible buffers, HEPES (4-(2-hydroxyethyl)-1-piperazineethanesulfonic acid), EPPS (3-[4-(2-Hydroxyethyl)piperazin-1-yl]propane-1-sulfonic acid), and PBS (phosphate buffered saline). Our findings show that HEPES exhibited the least amount of artificial deamidation and is a reasonable choice for general proteomic experiments, especially for studies considering N-glycosylation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胰蛋白酶消化缓冲液对人工脱酰胺的影响。
天冬酰胺和谷氨酰胺残基的脱酰胺是自发发生的,受pH值、温度和孵育时间的影响,并且可以被邻近的氨基酸残基加速。在自下而上的蛋白质组学研究中,用于蛋白质水解消化的培养条件可诱导有意或无意地影响结果的显着脱酰胺。这促使研究修改常见胰蛋白酶消化方案,以尽量减少化学脱酰胺,包括更短的孵育时间和特定的裂解缓冲液。先前的研究建议使用pH为6的乙酸铵来减少化学脱胺作用,但该缓冲液与胰蛋白酶消化和常见检测(如双霉素酸检测)存在兼容性问题。在这里,我们重新评估了三盐酸、碳酸氢铵和三乙基碳酸氢铵缓冲液在标准的自底向上蛋白质组学工作流程中产生的人工化学诱导脱酰胺量的比较,并增加了三种常用的生物相容性缓冲液,HEPES(4-(2-羟乙基)-1-哌嗪乙磺酸)、EPPS(3-[4-(2-羟乙基)哌嗪-1-基]丙烷-1-磺酸)和PBS(磷酸盐缓冲盐水)。我们的研究结果表明HEPES表现出最少的人工脱酰胺,是一般蛋白质组学实验的合理选择,特别是对于考虑n -糖基化的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
9.40%
发文量
257
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry presents research papers covering all aspects of mass spectrometry, incorporating coverage of fields of scientific inquiry in which mass spectrometry can play a role. Comprehensive in scope, the journal publishes papers on both fundamentals and applications of mass spectrometry. Fundamental subjects include instrumentation principles, design, and demonstration, structures and chemical properties of gas-phase ions, studies of thermodynamic properties, ion spectroscopy, chemical kinetics, mechanisms of ionization, theories of ion fragmentation, cluster ions, and potential energy surfaces. In addition to full papers, the journal offers Communications, Application Notes, and Accounts and Perspectives
期刊最新文献
Exploring the Potential of Ultrafast Arylation for Capping Cysteine Residues with Fixed Charge Modifications. Response Factor Correction for Quantitative Determination of Homooligomeric SsoSSB Binding to ssDNA by Native Mass Spectrometry. Rapidly Switchable Dual Ion Source Combining ESI with iLTP/Tube Plasma for LC-MS, Multi-2D LC × LC, and SLIM-IM-MS Applications. Top-Down Characterization of Protein Anions Using Ultraviolet Photodissociation Mass Spectrometry. Laser-Induced Acoustic Desorption/Dichloromethane-Enhanced Vacuum Ultraviolet Photoionization Mass Spectrometry for Analysis of Amino Acids.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1