Three-dimensional MRI follicle segmentation and counting using SegmentWithSAM in the diagnosis of polycystic ovary syndrome

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Abdominal Radiology Pub Date : 2025-01-30 DOI:10.1007/s00261-025-04818-x
Anrong Zeng, Jing Lu, Ying Li
{"title":"Three-dimensional MRI follicle segmentation and counting using SegmentWithSAM in the diagnosis of polycystic ovary syndrome","authors":"Anrong Zeng,&nbsp;Jing Lu,&nbsp;Ying Li","doi":"10.1007/s00261-025-04818-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic performance of Follicle numbers measured on ultrasound (US), conventional magnetic resonance imaging (2D MRI), and three-dimensional (3D) MRI in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and to compare the diagnostic efficacy of these imaging modalities.</p><h3>Method</h3><p> In this prospective study, 58 PCOS patients and 60 healthy women underwent US, conventional 2D MRI, and 3D MRI. Clinical laboratory tests and ovarian volume were compared between PCOS and control groups. Follicle numbers measured on US (FN-US), 2D MRI (FN-2D), and 3D MRI (FN-3D) using SegmentWithSAM were compared between PCOS and control groups using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and the DeLong test.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Ovarian volume and follicle numbers were significantly higher in the PCOS group than in the control group. The diagnostic performance was found with FN-3D achieving the highest AUC of 0.94 (95% CI: 0.90–0.98), superior to that of US (0.80 [95% CI: 0.72–0.88]) and 2D MRI (0.90 [95% CI: 0.84–0.96]), respectively. Significant differences in the diagnostic efficacy of follicle counts were observed between US, conventional MRI, and 3D MRI, with 3D MRI showing superior results.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>3D MRI was superior to US and 2D MRI in diagnosing PCOS, with the ability to display small follicles.</p><h3>Graphical abstract</h3><div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>","PeriodicalId":7126,"journal":{"name":"Abdominal Radiology","volume":"50 8","pages":"3847 - 3855"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abdominal Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00261-025-04818-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic performance of Follicle numbers measured on ultrasound (US), conventional magnetic resonance imaging (2D MRI), and three-dimensional (3D) MRI in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and to compare the diagnostic efficacy of these imaging modalities.

Method

In this prospective study, 58 PCOS patients and 60 healthy women underwent US, conventional 2D MRI, and 3D MRI. Clinical laboratory tests and ovarian volume were compared between PCOS and control groups. Follicle numbers measured on US (FN-US), 2D MRI (FN-2D), and 3D MRI (FN-3D) using SegmentWithSAM were compared between PCOS and control groups using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and the DeLong test.

Results

Ovarian volume and follicle numbers were significantly higher in the PCOS group than in the control group. The diagnostic performance was found with FN-3D achieving the highest AUC of 0.94 (95% CI: 0.90–0.98), superior to that of US (0.80 [95% CI: 0.72–0.88]) and 2D MRI (0.90 [95% CI: 0.84–0.96]), respectively. Significant differences in the diagnostic efficacy of follicle counts were observed between US, conventional MRI, and 3D MRI, with 3D MRI showing superior results.

Conclusion

3D MRI was superior to US and 2D MRI in diagnosing PCOS, with the ability to display small follicles.

Graphical abstract

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
应用SegmentWithSAM对多囊卵巢综合征的三维MRI卵泡分割和计数。
目的:探讨超声(US)、常规磁共振成像(2D MRI)和三维磁共振成像(3D)对多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)患者卵泡数的诊断价值,并比较这三种成像方式的诊断效果。方法:在这项前瞻性研究中,58名PCOS患者和60名健康女性分别进行了超声、常规二维MRI和三维MRI检查。PCOS组与对照组临床实验室检查及卵巢体积比较。采用SegmentWithSAM进行US (FN-US)、2D MRI (FN-2D)和3D MRI (FN-3D)的卵泡数量测量,采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析和DeLong检验比较PCOS组和对照组的卵泡数量。结果:PCOS组卵巢体积和卵泡数量明显高于对照组。FN-3D的诊断效果最高,AUC为0.94 (95% CI: 0.90-0.98),优于US (0.80 [95% CI: 0.72-0.88])和2D MRI (0.90 [95% CI: 0.84-0.96])。超声、常规MRI和3D MRI对卵泡计数的诊断效果差异有统计学意义,其中3D MRI的诊断效果更佳。结论:3D MRI对PCOS的诊断优于US和2D MRI,可显示小卵泡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Abdominal Radiology
Abdominal Radiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
334
期刊介绍: Abdominal Radiology seeks to meet the professional needs of the abdominal radiologist by publishing clinically pertinent original, review and practice related articles on the gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts and abdominal interventional and radiologic procedures. Case reports are generally not accepted unless they are the first report of a new disease or condition, or part of a special solicited section. Reasons to Publish Your Article in Abdominal Radiology: · Official journal of the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) · Published in Cooperation with: European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) Asian Society of Abdominal Radiology (ASAR) · Efficient handling and Expeditious review · Author feedback is provided in a mentoring style · Global readership · Readers can earn CME credits
期刊最新文献
Navigating the new frontier: growth, integrity, and our vision for 2026 From duodenitis to stricture: Decoding the impact of partial annular pancreas over years A CT-based 2.5D deep learning model for preoperative T-staging in gastric cancer: a retrospective multicenter study Early and delayed post-cesarean complications: an imaging review 18F-FDG PET-based ensemble deep learning model for the prediction of lymphovascular invasion in colorectal cancer patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1