{"title":"Three-dimensional MRI follicle segmentation and counting using SegmentWithSAM in the diagnosis of polycystic ovary syndrome.","authors":"Anrong Zeng, Jing Lu, Ying Li","doi":"10.1007/s00261-025-04818-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic performance of Follicle numbers measured on ultrasound (US), conventional magnetic resonance imaging (2D MRI), and three-dimensional (3D) MRI in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and to compare the diagnostic efficacy of these imaging modalities.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In this prospective study, 58 PCOS patients and 60 healthy women underwent US, conventional 2D MRI, and 3D MRI. Clinical laboratory tests and ovarian volume were compared between PCOS and control groups. Follicle numbers measured on US (FN-US), 2D MRI (FN-2D), and 3D MRI (FN-3D) using SegmentWithSAM were compared between PCOS and control groups using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and the DeLong test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ovarian volume and follicle numbers were significantly higher in the PCOS group than in the control group. The diagnostic performance was found with FN-3D achieving the highest AUC of 0.94 (95% CI: 0.90-0.98), superior to that of US (0.80 [95% CI: 0.72-0.88]) and 2D MRI (0.90 [95% CI: 0.84-0.96]), respectively. Significant differences in the diagnostic efficacy of follicle counts were observed between US, conventional MRI, and 3D MRI, with 3D MRI showing superior results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>3D MRI was superior to US and 2D MRI in diagnosing PCOS, with the ability to display small follicles.</p>","PeriodicalId":7126,"journal":{"name":"Abdominal Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abdominal Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-025-04818-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic performance of Follicle numbers measured on ultrasound (US), conventional magnetic resonance imaging (2D MRI), and three-dimensional (3D) MRI in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and to compare the diagnostic efficacy of these imaging modalities.
Method: In this prospective study, 58 PCOS patients and 60 healthy women underwent US, conventional 2D MRI, and 3D MRI. Clinical laboratory tests and ovarian volume were compared between PCOS and control groups. Follicle numbers measured on US (FN-US), 2D MRI (FN-2D), and 3D MRI (FN-3D) using SegmentWithSAM were compared between PCOS and control groups using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and the DeLong test.
Results: Ovarian volume and follicle numbers were significantly higher in the PCOS group than in the control group. The diagnostic performance was found with FN-3D achieving the highest AUC of 0.94 (95% CI: 0.90-0.98), superior to that of US (0.80 [95% CI: 0.72-0.88]) and 2D MRI (0.90 [95% CI: 0.84-0.96]), respectively. Significant differences in the diagnostic efficacy of follicle counts were observed between US, conventional MRI, and 3D MRI, with 3D MRI showing superior results.
Conclusion: 3D MRI was superior to US and 2D MRI in diagnosing PCOS, with the ability to display small follicles.
期刊介绍:
Abdominal Radiology seeks to meet the professional needs of the abdominal radiologist by publishing clinically pertinent original, review and practice related articles on the gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts and abdominal interventional and radiologic procedures. Case reports are generally not accepted unless they are the first report of a new disease or condition, or part of a special solicited section.
Reasons to Publish Your Article in Abdominal Radiology:
· Official journal of the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR)
· Published in Cooperation with:
European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR)
European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR)
Asian Society of Abdominal Radiology (ASAR)
· Efficient handling and Expeditious review
· Author feedback is provided in a mentoring style
· Global readership
· Readers can earn CME credits