Efficacy and Safety of Four Weeks of Moderately Hypofractionated Chemoradiation for Unresectable, Stage 3 Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology Pub Date : 2025-01-29 DOI:10.1111/ajco.14152
Joanna Jane Ludbrook, Mahesh Kumar, Yu Yang Soon, Angela Smith, Girish Mallesara, Eric Hau, Fiona Hegi-Johnson, Shalini Vinod
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Four Weeks of Moderately Hypofractionated Chemoradiation for Unresectable, Stage 3 Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review","authors":"Joanna Jane Ludbrook,&nbsp;Mahesh Kumar,&nbsp;Yu Yang Soon,&nbsp;Angela Smith,&nbsp;Girish Mallesara,&nbsp;Eric Hau,&nbsp;Fiona Hegi-Johnson,&nbsp;Shalini Vinod","doi":"10.1111/ajco.14152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Shortening treatment time with moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy benefits patients by reducing inconvenience and costs, but its use in the definitive treatment of unresectable Stage 3 non–small cell lung cancer is controversial due to lack of level one evidence and toxicity concerns. Pivotal systemic therapy trials utilize conventionally fractionated chemoradiation at 2 Gy per fraction given over 6 weeks. In practice, 4 weeks of chemoradiation at 2.75 Gy per fraction is sometimes employed to reduce the treatment burden for selected patients, especially those who are older or have comorbidities. It is uncertain if the two fractionation regimens are similar in biological effectiveness, especially with varying systemic therapy. This systematic review aimed to collate the survival and toxicity outcomes for 4 weeks of moderately hypofractionated chemoradiation, using &gt; 50 –60 Gy in 20 fractions. Eight studies met the eligibility criteria; seven studies were from a database search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science and one study was added later. Two studies were prospective randomized trials and six were retrospective cohort studies. No study included immunotherapy. The historical evidence has been limited, but emerging data is promising, especially when compared to outcomes of standard chemoradiation. Thus, further investigation of this strategy is justified.</p>","PeriodicalId":8633,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology","volume":"21 4","pages":"359-367"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ajco.14152","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajco.14152","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Shortening treatment time with moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy benefits patients by reducing inconvenience and costs, but its use in the definitive treatment of unresectable Stage 3 non–small cell lung cancer is controversial due to lack of level one evidence and toxicity concerns. Pivotal systemic therapy trials utilize conventionally fractionated chemoradiation at 2 Gy per fraction given over 6 weeks. In practice, 4 weeks of chemoradiation at 2.75 Gy per fraction is sometimes employed to reduce the treatment burden for selected patients, especially those who are older or have comorbidities. It is uncertain if the two fractionation regimens are similar in biological effectiveness, especially with varying systemic therapy. This systematic review aimed to collate the survival and toxicity outcomes for 4 weeks of moderately hypofractionated chemoradiation, using > 50 –60 Gy in 20 fractions. Eight studies met the eligibility criteria; seven studies were from a database search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science and one study was added later. Two studies were prospective randomized trials and six were retrospective cohort studies. No study included immunotherapy. The historical evidence has been limited, but emerging data is promising, especially when compared to outcomes of standard chemoradiation. Thus, further investigation of this strategy is justified.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
4周中度低分割放化疗治疗不可切除的3期非小细胞肺癌的疗效和安全性:一项系统综述。
适度低分割放疗缩短了治疗时间,减少了患者的不便和费用,但由于缺乏一级证据和毒性问题,它在不可切除的3期非小细胞肺癌的最终治疗中的应用存在争议。关键的全身治疗试验使用传统的分次放化疗,每分次2 Gy,持续6周。在实践中,有时采用4周的化疗,每次2.75 Gy,以减轻选定患者的治疗负担,特别是那些年龄较大或有合并症的患者。目前尚不清楚这两种分离方案在生物学效果上是否相似,特别是在不同的全身治疗中。本系统综述旨在整理中度低分割放化疗4周的生存和毒性结果,使用> 50 -60 Gy分为20个部分。8项研究符合入选标准;7项研究来自MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane Library和Web of Science数据库检索,1项研究是后来添加的。2项研究为前瞻性随机试验,6项为回顾性队列研究。没有研究包括免疫治疗。历史证据有限,但新出现的数据是有希望的,特别是与标准放化疗的结果相比。因此,进一步研究这一策略是合理的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
175
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Asia–Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology is a multidisciplinary journal of oncology that aims to be a forum for facilitating collaboration and exchanging information on what is happening in different countries of the Asia–Pacific region in relation to cancer treatment and care. The Journal is ideally positioned to receive publications that deal with diversity in cancer behavior, management and outcome related to ethnic, cultural, economic and other differences between populations. In addition to original articles, the Journal publishes reviews, editorials, letters to the Editor and short communications. Case reports are generally not considered for publication, only exceptional papers in which Editors find extraordinary oncological value may be considered for review. The Journal encourages clinical studies, particularly prospectively designed clinical trials.
期刊最新文献
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Hormone Therapy for Breast Cancer in Japan. Global Burden, Quality of Care, and Attributable Risk Factors of Young-Onset Breast Cancer (YOBC) by WHO Regions: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Oncological Care Needs of People With Mental Illness: A Single Institution Experience in Australia. Development and Evaluation of a PEGylated Lyophilized Nanoliposomal Formulation of Nilotinib for Enhanced Solubility, Intestinal Permeation, and In Vitro Anticancer Activity. Breast Cancer Awareness and the Practice of Self Breast Examination Among Undergraduate Students in Karachi, Pakistan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1