Risk factors for visual loss after excision of orbital cavernous venous malformations: a systematic review.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY British Journal of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2025-05-30 DOI:10.1136/bjo-2024-326395
James Pietris, Clare Quigley, Alkis James Psaltis, Geoffrey E Rose, Dinesh Selva
{"title":"Risk factors for visual loss after excision of orbital cavernous venous malformations: a systematic review.","authors":"James Pietris, Clare Quigley, Alkis James Psaltis, Geoffrey E Rose, Dinesh Selva","doi":"10.1136/bjo-2024-326395","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Orbital cavernous venous malformations (OCVMs) are the most common primary orbital mass lesion and presenting symptoms are usually secondary to a mass effect. Surgical excision presents unique challenges and vision loss is a rare, but devastating, complication. This review aims to identify risk factors for vision loss with excision of OCVMs.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A systematic search of the databases PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase and CENTRAL was performed to May 2024, prior to data collection and risk of bias analysis in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. 16 articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>These studies identified apical location and strong adherence to apical structures, including the optic nerve, as characteristics carrying a higher risk of postoperative vision loss. Symptoms and signs with a poor visual prognosis included preoperative visual loss, relative afferent pupillary defect, optic disc abnormality and choroidal folds. Intraoperative risk factors include prolonged vascular handling and traction on the optic nerve, as well as low intraoperative diastolic blood pressure. Central retinal artery occlusion was the most common cause of vision loss.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There are several risk factors for poor visual outcome after excision of OCVMs. Surgical and anaesthetic teams should remain cognisant of these factors, and be willing to adapt their intraoperative management as required. Further large-scale prospective studies might aid the development of management guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":9313,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":"728-732"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo-2024-326395","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Orbital cavernous venous malformations (OCVMs) are the most common primary orbital mass lesion and presenting symptoms are usually secondary to a mass effect. Surgical excision presents unique challenges and vision loss is a rare, but devastating, complication. This review aims to identify risk factors for vision loss with excision of OCVMs.

Method: A systematic search of the databases PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase and CENTRAL was performed to May 2024, prior to data collection and risk of bias analysis in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. 16 articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria.

Results: These studies identified apical location and strong adherence to apical structures, including the optic nerve, as characteristics carrying a higher risk of postoperative vision loss. Symptoms and signs with a poor visual prognosis included preoperative visual loss, relative afferent pupillary defect, optic disc abnormality and choroidal folds. Intraoperative risk factors include prolonged vascular handling and traction on the optic nerve, as well as low intraoperative diastolic blood pressure. Central retinal artery occlusion was the most common cause of vision loss.

Conclusion: There are several risk factors for poor visual outcome after excision of OCVMs. Surgical and anaesthetic teams should remain cognisant of these factors, and be willing to adapt their intraoperative management as required. Further large-scale prospective studies might aid the development of management guidelines.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
眼窝海绵静脉畸形切除后视力丧失的危险因素:系统回顾。
背景:眼眶海绵状静脉畸形(ocvm)是最常见的原发性眼眶肿块病变,其症状通常是继发于肿块效应。手术切除带来了独特的挑战和视力丧失是一个罕见的,但毁灭性的并发症。这篇综述的目的是确定眼球外膜切除导致视力丧失的危险因素。方法:系统检索PubMed/MEDLINE、Embase和CENTRAL数据库至2024年5月,根据系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目进行数据收集和偏倚风险分析。16篇文章符合纳入标准。结果:这些研究确定了根尖位置和根尖结构(包括视神经)的强粘附性是术后视力丧失风险较高的特征。视力预后差的症状和体征包括术前视力丧失、相对传入瞳孔缺损、视盘异常和脉络膜褶皱。术中危险因素包括长时间的血管处理和视神经牵拉,以及术中舒张压过低。视网膜中央动脉闭塞是视力丧失的最常见原因。结论:有多种危险因素可导致眼外膜切除术后视力不佳。外科和麻醉团队应保持对这些因素的认识,并愿意根据需要调整术中管理。进一步的大规模前瞻性研究可能有助于制定管理指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
2.40%
发文量
213
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Ophthalmology (BJO) is an international peer-reviewed journal for ophthalmologists and visual science specialists. BJO publishes clinical investigations, clinical observations, and clinically relevant laboratory investigations related to ophthalmology. It also provides major reviews and also publishes manuscripts covering regional issues in a global context.
期刊最新文献
Aqueous humour outflow improvement after excimer laser trabeculostomy. The Manchester buckle study: 15-year outcomes and predictive factors for success in scleral buckling for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Long-term outcomes of and a risk score model for moderate-risk to high-risk penetrating keratoplasty. Trends in follow-up visits and visual acuity gain in infectious keratitis: report from a tertiary eye care centre. Biomarker changes of choroidal architecture preceding myopia onset in Chinese school children: a 3-year prospective cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1