The Prevalence of Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions Pub Date : 2025-01-29 DOI:10.1002/ccd.31429
Kalyan R. Chitturi, Sant Kumar, Flavia Tejada Frisancho, Sana Rahman, Beni Rai Verma, Matteo Cellamare, Ilan Merdler, Sevket Tolga Ozturk, Vijoli Cermak, Vaishnavi Sawant, Cheng Zhang, Itsik Ben-Dor, Ron Waksman, Hayder D. Hashim, Brian C. Case
{"title":"The Prevalence of Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus","authors":"Kalyan R. Chitturi,&nbsp;Sant Kumar,&nbsp;Flavia Tejada Frisancho,&nbsp;Sana Rahman,&nbsp;Beni Rai Verma,&nbsp;Matteo Cellamare,&nbsp;Ilan Merdler,&nbsp;Sevket Tolga Ozturk,&nbsp;Vijoli Cermak,&nbsp;Vaishnavi Sawant,&nbsp;Cheng Zhang,&nbsp;Itsik Ben-Dor,&nbsp;Ron Waksman,&nbsp;Hayder D. Hashim,&nbsp;Brian C. Case","doi":"10.1002/ccd.31429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n <p>Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) are more susceptible to microvascular complications. However, whether DM is associated with coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is unclear. This observational study used data from the Coronary Microvascular Disease Registry (CMDR) (NCT05960474) and included patients with angina and no obstructive coronary artery disease (ANOCA) who underwent invasive CMD evaluation using the CoroVentis CoroFlow System (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA). Patient demographics, comorbidities, laboratory data, echocardiography, coronary angiography, and microvascular physiology results were analyzed. Among the 271 patients, 73 (26.9%) had DM. These patients were more likely to be African American (68.1% vs. 47.0%) and had higher rates of hypertension (93.2% vs. 74.2%), hyperlipidemia (89.0% vs. 68.7%), and chronic kidney disease (17.8% vs. 8.1%) than those without DM. Invasive coronary functional testing showed no significant differences in the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) (17.82 ± 8.17 vs. 19.37 ± 13.14, <i>p </i>= 0.268) or coronary flow reserve (CFR) (3.24 ± 1.73 vs. 3.21 ± 1.86, <i>p </i>= 0.909) between diabetic and nondiabetic patients. Similarly, in those testing positive for CMD, there were no significant differences in IMR (27.8 ± 7.4 vs. 32.35 ± 15.22, <i>p </i>= 0.108) or CFR (2.42 ± 1.09 vs. 2.05 ± 0.94, <i>p </i>= 0.199). Although patients with DM exhibited more comorbidities, CMD physiology indices were comparable between the groups.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":9650,"journal":{"name":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","volume":"105 5","pages":"1120-1123"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ccd.31429","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) are more susceptible to microvascular complications. However, whether DM is associated with coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is unclear. This observational study used data from the Coronary Microvascular Disease Registry (CMDR) (NCT05960474) and included patients with angina and no obstructive coronary artery disease (ANOCA) who underwent invasive CMD evaluation using the CoroVentis CoroFlow System (Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA). Patient demographics, comorbidities, laboratory data, echocardiography, coronary angiography, and microvascular physiology results were analyzed. Among the 271 patients, 73 (26.9%) had DM. These patients were more likely to be African American (68.1% vs. 47.0%) and had higher rates of hypertension (93.2% vs. 74.2%), hyperlipidemia (89.0% vs. 68.7%), and chronic kidney disease (17.8% vs. 8.1%) than those without DM. Invasive coronary functional testing showed no significant differences in the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) (17.82 ± 8.17 vs. 19.37 ± 13.14, p = 0.268) or coronary flow reserve (CFR) (3.24 ± 1.73 vs. 3.21 ± 1.86, p = 0.909) between diabetic and nondiabetic patients. Similarly, in those testing positive for CMD, there were no significant differences in IMR (27.8 ± 7.4 vs. 32.35 ± 15.22, p = 0.108) or CFR (2.42 ± 1.09 vs. 2.05 ± 0.94, p = 0.199). Although patients with DM exhibited more comorbidities, CMD physiology indices were comparable between the groups.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2型糖尿病患者冠状动脉微血管功能障碍的患病率
2型糖尿病(DM)患者更易发生微血管并发症。然而,糖尿病是否与冠状动脉微血管功能障碍(CMD)相关尚不清楚。这项观察性研究使用冠状动脉微血管疾病登记处(CMDR) (NCT05960474)的数据,纳入了使用CoroVentis CoroFlow系统(Abbott Vascular, Santa Clara, CA)进行有创CMD评估的心绞痛和非阻塞性冠状动脉疾病(ANOCA)患者。分析患者人口统计学、合并症、实验室数据、超声心动图、冠状动脉造影和微血管生理学结果。271名患者中,73例(26.9%)有DM。这些患者更有可能是非洲裔美国人(68.1%比47.0%),有较高的高血压(93.2%比74.2%),高脂血症(89.0%比68.7%),慢性肾脏疾病(17.8%比8.1%)比那些没有DM。侵入性冠状动脉功能测试显示,microcirculatory阻力指数无显著差异(IMR)(17.82±8.17和19.37±13.14,p = 0.268)或冠状流储备(CFR)(3.24±1.73和3.21±1.86,P = 0.909)。同样,在CMD阳性组中,IMR(27.8±7.4比32.35±15.22,p = 0.108)和CFR(2.42±1.09比2.05±0.94,p = 0.199)差异无统计学意义。虽然糖尿病患者表现出更多的合并症,但两组之间的CMD生理指标具有可比性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
8.70%
发文量
419
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions is an international journal covering the broad field of cardiovascular diseases. Subject material includes basic and clinical information that is derived from or related to invasive and interventional coronary or peripheral vascular techniques. The journal focuses on material that will be of immediate practical value to physicians providing patient care in the clinical laboratory setting. To accomplish this, the journal publishes Preliminary Reports and Work In Progress articles that complement the traditional Original Studies, Case Reports, and Comprehensive Reviews. Perspective and insight concerning controversial subjects and evolving technologies are provided regularly through Editorial Commentaries furnished by members of the Editorial Board and other experts. Articles are subject to double-blind peer review and complete editorial evaluation prior to any decision regarding acceptability.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Issue Information Issue Information Transcatheter Pulmonary Valve Replacement With a Novel Valve: Medium-Term Results From a Single Center Study Impact of Individual Culprit Coronary Arteries Revascularized by Primary PCI on Clinical Outcomes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1