Small Remnants versus Large Triglyceride-Rich Lipoproteins in Risk of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease.

IF 6.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY Clinical chemistry Pub Date : 2025-04-03 DOI:10.1093/clinchem/hvae222
Benjamin N Wadström, Anders B Wulff, Kasper M Pedersen, Børge G Nordestgaard
{"title":"Small Remnants versus Large Triglyceride-Rich Lipoproteins in Risk of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease.","authors":"Benjamin N Wadström, Anders B Wulff, Kasper M Pedersen, Børge G Nordestgaard","doi":"10.1093/clinchem/hvae222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Small remnants may penetrate the arterial intima more efficiently compared to large triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (TGRL). We tested the hypothesis that the importance of remnant cholesterol for the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) may depend on the size of the remnants and TGRL carrying cholesterol.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The cholesterol content of small remnants and large TGRL were measured in 25 572 individuals from the Copenhagen General Population Study (2003-2015) and in 222 721 individuals from the UK Biobank (2006-2010) using nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. In the Copenhagen cohort during up to 15 years of follow-up and in the UK Biobank cohort during up to 16 years of follow-up, the numbers of individuals diagnosed with ASCVD (=myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and peripheral artery disease) in national health registries were 3869 and 11 424, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to individuals with low cholesterol content in both small remnants and large TGRL (cutpoints were median cholesterol content), multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios for risk of ASCVD were 1.21 (95% confidence interval: 1.07-1.37) for individuals with high cholesterol content in small remnants only and 0.94 (0.83-1.07) for individuals with high cholesterol content in large TGRL only; the multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio for risk of ASCVD per 10 percentile-units higher cholesterol content in small remnants vs that in large TGRL was 1.04 (1.01-1.07). In the UK Biobank cohort, corresponding hazard ratios were 1.11 (1.03-1.20), 1.01 (0.93-1.09), and 1.05 (1.04-1.07), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The importance of remnant cholesterol for the risk of ASCVD may depend on the size of the TGRL and remnants carrying cholesterol.</p>","PeriodicalId":10690,"journal":{"name":"Clinical chemistry","volume":" ","pages":"463-473"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvae222","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Small remnants may penetrate the arterial intima more efficiently compared to large triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (TGRL). We tested the hypothesis that the importance of remnant cholesterol for the risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) may depend on the size of the remnants and TGRL carrying cholesterol.

Methods: The cholesterol content of small remnants and large TGRL were measured in 25 572 individuals from the Copenhagen General Population Study (2003-2015) and in 222 721 individuals from the UK Biobank (2006-2010) using nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. In the Copenhagen cohort during up to 15 years of follow-up and in the UK Biobank cohort during up to 16 years of follow-up, the numbers of individuals diagnosed with ASCVD (=myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and peripheral artery disease) in national health registries were 3869 and 11 424, respectively.

Results: Compared to individuals with low cholesterol content in both small remnants and large TGRL (cutpoints were median cholesterol content), multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios for risk of ASCVD were 1.21 (95% confidence interval: 1.07-1.37) for individuals with high cholesterol content in small remnants only and 0.94 (0.83-1.07) for individuals with high cholesterol content in large TGRL only; the multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio for risk of ASCVD per 10 percentile-units higher cholesterol content in small remnants vs that in large TGRL was 1.04 (1.01-1.07). In the UK Biobank cohort, corresponding hazard ratios were 1.11 (1.03-1.20), 1.01 (0.93-1.09), and 1.05 (1.04-1.07), respectively.

Conclusion: The importance of remnant cholesterol for the risk of ASCVD may depend on the size of the TGRL and remnants carrying cholesterol.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
小残体与大富甘油三酯脂蛋白在动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病中的风险
背景:与大的富甘油三酯脂蛋白(TGRL)相比,小的残留物可以更有效地穿透动脉内膜。我们检验了残余胆固醇对动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)风险的重要性可能取决于残余胆固醇的大小和TGRL携带胆固醇的假设。方法:采用核磁共振波谱法对来自哥本哈根普通人群研究(2003-2015)的25572名个体和来自英国生物银行(2006-2010)的222 721名个体的小残余胆固醇含量和大TGRL含量进行了测量。在长达15年随访的哥本哈根队列和长达16年随访的英国生物银行队列中,在国家健康登记处诊断为ASCVD(=心肌梗死、缺血性卒中和外周动脉疾病)的人数分别为3869人和11424人。结果:与小残体和大TGRL中胆固醇含量均较低的个体(切点为胆固醇含量中位数)相比,仅小残体中胆固醇含量高的个体ASCVD风险的多变量调整风险比为1.21(95%置信区间:1.07-1.37),仅大TGRL中胆固醇含量高的个体ASCVD风险的多变量调整风险比为0.94 (0.83-1.07);小残渣与大TGRL中胆固醇含量每高10个百分位数单位发生ASCVD风险的多变量校正风险比为1.04(1.01-1.07)。在UK Biobank队列中,相应的风险比分别为1.11(1.03-1.20)、1.01(0.93-1.09)和1.05(1.04-1.07)。结论:残余胆固醇对ASCVD风险的重要性可能取决于TGRL的大小和残余携带的胆固醇。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical chemistry
Clinical chemistry 医学-医学实验技术
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
212
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Chemistry is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that is the premier publication for the science and practice of clinical laboratory medicine. It was established in 1955 and is associated with the Association for Diagnostics & Laboratory Medicine (ADLM). The journal focuses on laboratory diagnosis and management of patients, and has expanded to include other clinical laboratory disciplines such as genomics, hematology, microbiology, and toxicology. It also publishes articles relevant to clinical specialties including cardiology, endocrinology, gastroenterology, genetics, immunology, infectious diseases, maternal-fetal medicine, neurology, nutrition, oncology, and pediatrics. In addition to original research, editorials, and reviews, Clinical Chemistry features recurring sections such as clinical case studies, perspectives, podcasts, and Q&A articles. It has the highest impact factor among journals of clinical chemistry, laboratory medicine, pathology, analytical chemistry, transfusion medicine, and clinical microbiology. The journal is indexed in databases such as MEDLINE and Web of Science.
期刊最新文献
Transferability and Between Laboratory Imprecision of an LC-MS/MS-Based Reference Measurement Procedure for Apolipoproteins. Point of Concern for Troponin Testing with High-Sensitivity Assays in the Near Patient Setting. Whose Role Is It, Anyway? Ensuring Correct Genomic Variant Nomenclature in Published Literature. Performance, Safety, and Patient Experience of an Autonomous Robotic Phlebotomy Device: A Multicenter Trial. Development of a Novel Liquid Chromatography Coupled to Multiple Reaction Monitoring (LC-MRM) Assay for the Quantification of Neurofilament Light Chain in Cerebrospinal Fluid and Comparison with Ultra-Sensitive Immunoassay: A Step toward Standardization.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1