Predictors of revision endoscopic sinus surgery in Finnish patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps

IF 4 2区 医学 Q2 ALLERGY Clinical and Translational Allergy Pub Date : 2025-01-29 DOI:10.1002/clt2.70032
Sanna Toppila-Salmi, Annina Lyly, Johanna Simin, Juhani Aakko, Helga Haugom Olsen, Lauri Lehtimäki
{"title":"Predictors of revision endoscopic sinus surgery in Finnish patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps","authors":"Sanna Toppila-Salmi,&nbsp;Annina Lyly,&nbsp;Johanna Simin,&nbsp;Juhani Aakko,&nbsp;Helga Haugom Olsen,&nbsp;Lauri Lehtimäki","doi":"10.1002/clt2.70032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Although patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) may benefit from endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS), some patients will experience polyp recurrence, adding to the overall disease burden of CRSwNP. We aimed to investigate predictors of revision ESS in patients with CRSwNP.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A nationwide population-based study including all adults diagnosed with CRSwNP who had surgical procedure codes for ESS (<i>N</i> = 3506), followed up between January 2012 and December 2019. Logistic regression models provided adjusted odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the odds of revision surgery within one and 3 years post-index surgery.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>559 (15.9%) of the patients had at least one revision surgery during the follow-up. Median time to revision of ESS was 425 days (interquartile range: 213–898). Baseline asthma (OR = 1.58, 95% CI 1.17–2.12) and antibiotic use (OR = 1.61, 95% CI 1.27–2.04) were associated with higher odds of revision ESS, particularly within 3 years post-index surgery, whereas Increasing age was inversely associated with the odds of ESS revision (OR = 0.82, 95% CI 0.76–0.88). The highest odds of revision ESS were observed within 3 years post-index surgery in patients who had undergone extensive surgery at index (OR = 14.13, 95% CI 3.41–95.64) compared with those who had undergone limited surgery. OCS use was frequent among CRSwNP patients, with a higher cumulative dose in patients undergoing multiple ESS revisions (63%, <i>n</i> = 97, median daily dose 3.29 mg, IQR: 1.64–3.70) compared with patients without revisions (49%, <i>n</i> = 1361 and 1.64 mg, IQR: 1.64–3.29, respectively. <i>p</i>-value &lt;0.001).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>A small proportion of CRSwNP patients require revision ESS with associated high cumulative OCS doses, highlighting the need for additional therapies to achieve disease control and reduce the corticosteroid burden. A few simple baseline characteristics can predict the need for recurrent surgery among the patients with CRSwNP.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10334,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Allergy","volume":"15 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11779534/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Translational Allergy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/clt2.70032","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Although patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) may benefit from endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS), some patients will experience polyp recurrence, adding to the overall disease burden of CRSwNP. We aimed to investigate predictors of revision ESS in patients with CRSwNP.

Methods

A nationwide population-based study including all adults diagnosed with CRSwNP who had surgical procedure codes for ESS (N = 3506), followed up between January 2012 and December 2019. Logistic regression models provided adjusted odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the odds of revision surgery within one and 3 years post-index surgery.

Results

559 (15.9%) of the patients had at least one revision surgery during the follow-up. Median time to revision of ESS was 425 days (interquartile range: 213–898). Baseline asthma (OR = 1.58, 95% CI 1.17–2.12) and antibiotic use (OR = 1.61, 95% CI 1.27–2.04) were associated with higher odds of revision ESS, particularly within 3 years post-index surgery, whereas Increasing age was inversely associated with the odds of ESS revision (OR = 0.82, 95% CI 0.76–0.88). The highest odds of revision ESS were observed within 3 years post-index surgery in patients who had undergone extensive surgery at index (OR = 14.13, 95% CI 3.41–95.64) compared with those who had undergone limited surgery. OCS use was frequent among CRSwNP patients, with a higher cumulative dose in patients undergoing multiple ESS revisions (63%, n = 97, median daily dose 3.29 mg, IQR: 1.64–3.70) compared with patients without revisions (49%, n = 1361 and 1.64 mg, IQR: 1.64–3.29, respectively. p-value <0.001).

Conclusions

A small proportion of CRSwNP patients require revision ESS with associated high cumulative OCS doses, highlighting the need for additional therapies to achieve disease control and reduce the corticosteroid burden. A few simple baseline characteristics can predict the need for recurrent surgery among the patients with CRSwNP.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
芬兰慢性鼻窦炎合并鼻息肉患者翻修内窥镜鼻窦手术的预测因素。
背景:虽然慢性鼻窦炎合并鼻息肉(CRSwNP)患者可能受益于内窥镜鼻窦手术(ESS),但一些患者会经历息肉复发,增加了CRSwNP的总体疾病负担。我们的目的是研究CRSwNP患者改良ESS的预测因素。方法:一项基于全国人群的研究,包括所有被诊断为CRSwNP且手术代码为ESS的成年人(N = 3506),于2012年1月至2019年12月进行随访。Logistic回归模型提供校正优势比(OR), 95%置信区间(ci)为指数手术后1年和3年内翻修手术的几率。结果:559例(15.9%)患者在随访期间至少进行了一次翻修手术。到ESS修订的中位时间为425天(四分位数范围:213-898)。基线哮喘(OR = 1.58, 95% CI 1.17-2.12)和抗生素使用(OR = 1.61, 95% CI 1.27-2.04)与ESS修订的几率较高相关,特别是在指数手术后3年内,而年龄的增加与ESS修订的几率呈负相关(OR = 0.82, 95% CI 0.76-0.88)。与那些接受有限手术的患者相比,在指数手术后3年内,接受广泛手术的患者的翻修ESS的几率最高(OR = 14.13, 95% CI 3.41-95.64)。在CRSwNP患者中,OCS的使用较为频繁,接受多次ESS修订的患者累积剂量(63%,n = 97,中位日剂量3.29 mg, IQR: 1.64-3.70)高于未接受ESS修订的患者(49%,n = 1361和1.64 mg, IQR: 1.64-3.29)。结论:一小部分CRSwNP患者需要修改ESS并相关的高累积OCS剂量,强调需要额外的治疗来实现疾病控制和减少皮质类固醇负担。一些简单的基线特征可以预测CRSwNP患者是否需要再手术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical and Translational Allergy
Clinical and Translational Allergy Immunology and Microbiology-Immunology
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
117
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Translational Allergy, one of several journals in the portfolio of the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, provides a platform for the dissemination of allergy research and reviews, as well as EAACI position papers, task force reports and guidelines, amongst an international scientific audience. Clinical and Translational Allergy accepts clinical and translational research in the following areas and other related topics: asthma, rhinitis, rhinosinusitis, drug hypersensitivity, allergic conjunctivitis, allergic skin diseases, atopic eczema, urticaria, angioedema, venom hypersensitivity, anaphylaxis, food allergy, immunotherapy, immune modulators and biologics, animal models of allergic disease, immune mechanisms, or any other topic related to allergic disease.
期刊最新文献
Early Oral Immunotherapy With Pasteurized Egg White in Egg-Allergic Children Under 2 Years of Age. T-Cell Populations in Infancy After Maternal Probiotic Supplementation to Prevent Atopic Dermatitis. Allergy to Cats: Current Perspectives and Therapeutic Options. An International Delphi Study on Barriers to On-Demand Treatment of Hereditary Angioedema Attacks. Understanding Prebiotic Allergy: An Evaluation of Basophil Activation Induced by Galacto-Oligosaccharides.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1