Effectiveness of a Pharmacist-Led Intervention to Reduce Acid Suppression Therapy for Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in ICUs in China: A Multicenter, Stepped-Wedge, Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Critical Care Medicine Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-30 DOI:10.1097/CCM.0000000000006589
Hailong Li, Linan Zeng, Peipei Xu, Keith Olsen, Anders Granholm, Xiaodong Jin, Lingli Zhang, Gordon Guyatt
{"title":"Effectiveness of a Pharmacist-Led Intervention to Reduce Acid Suppression Therapy for Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis in ICUs in China: A Multicenter, Stepped-Wedge, Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Hailong Li, Linan Zeng, Peipei Xu, Keith Olsen, Anders Granholm, Xiaodong Jin, Lingli Zhang, Gordon Guyatt","doi":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006589","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a pharmacist-led intervention in decreasing the overuse of stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) compared with the usual care for adult patients in Chinese ICUs.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Pragmatic, multicenter, stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Twenty-six ICUs in China from October 2022 to March 2023.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>We enrolled 2199 patients 18 years old or older who were newly admitted to the participating ICUs.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Using the Medical Research Council framework for developing and evaluating complex intervention measures, a multidisciplinary team (Scenarios, Improving and Refining Interventions, Constructing, Refining and Testing Research Theories, Incorporating Stakeholders, Identifying Important Uncertainties, and Economics Considerations) designed a multifaceted intervention.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>The primary outcomes were the proportion of patients receiving SUP and that with overt gastrointestinal bleeding. We conducted intention-to-treat analyses using generalized linear mixed models to adjust for potential confounders (age, sex, and acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II score) with random effects for the site. The proportion of patients receiving SUP in the intervention group was lower than that in the control group (45.5% vs. 49.5%; odds ratio [OR], 0.81; 95% CI, 0.68-0.96; p = 0.017). The proportion of patients with overt gastrointestinal bleeding was similar (3.7% vs. 4.0%; OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.65-2.85; p = 0.81).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The pharmacist-led intervention reduced the proportion of patients receiving SUP in the ICUs, without significantly affecting the proportion of patients with overt gastrointestinal bleeding. These findings will help guide ICU medical decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":10765,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"e805-e816"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11952691/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000006589","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a pharmacist-led intervention in decreasing the overuse of stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) compared with the usual care for adult patients in Chinese ICUs.

Design: Pragmatic, multicenter, stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized controlled trial.

Setting: Twenty-six ICUs in China from October 2022 to March 2023.

Patients: We enrolled 2199 patients 18 years old or older who were newly admitted to the participating ICUs.

Interventions: Using the Medical Research Council framework for developing and evaluating complex intervention measures, a multidisciplinary team (Scenarios, Improving and Refining Interventions, Constructing, Refining and Testing Research Theories, Incorporating Stakeholders, Identifying Important Uncertainties, and Economics Considerations) designed a multifaceted intervention.

Measurements and main results: The primary outcomes were the proportion of patients receiving SUP and that with overt gastrointestinal bleeding. We conducted intention-to-treat analyses using generalized linear mixed models to adjust for potential confounders (age, sex, and acute physiology and chronic health evaluation II score) with random effects for the site. The proportion of patients receiving SUP in the intervention group was lower than that in the control group (45.5% vs. 49.5%; odds ratio [OR], 0.81; 95% CI, 0.68-0.96; p = 0.017). The proportion of patients with overt gastrointestinal bleeding was similar (3.7% vs. 4.0%; OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.65-2.85; p = 0.81).

Conclusions: The pharmacist-led intervention reduced the proportion of patients receiving SUP in the ICUs, without significantly affecting the proportion of patients with overt gastrointestinal bleeding. These findings will help guide ICU medical decision-making.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在中国,药剂师主导的干预减少酸抑制治疗对重症监护室应激性溃疡预防的有效性:一项多中心、楔形步进、集群随机对照试验。
目的:本研究旨在评估药剂师主导的干预措施在减少应激性溃疡预防(SUP)过度使用方面的有效性,与中国icu成人患者的常规护理相比。设计:实用、多中心、楔形踏步、集群随机对照试验。设定:2022年10月至2023年3月,中国26个icu。患者:我们招募了2199名18岁及以上的新入组icu的患者。干预措施:利用医学研究委员会制定和评估复杂干预措施的框架,一个多学科小组(设想、改进和改进干预措施、构建、改进和测试研究理论、纳入利益相关者、识别重要的不确定性和经济考虑因素)设计了一个多方面的干预措施。测量和主要结果:主要结果是接受SUP治疗的患者和有明显胃肠道出血的患者的比例。我们使用广义线性混合模型进行意向治疗分析,以调整潜在的混杂因素(年龄、性别、急性生理和慢性健康评估II评分)和随机效应。干预组接受SUP的患者比例低于对照组(45.5% vs 49.5%;优势比[OR], 0.81;95% ci, 0.68-0.96;P = 0.017)。明显消化道出血的患者比例相似(3.7% vs. 4.0%;或者,1.05;95% ci, 0.65-2.85;P = 0.81)。结论:药师主导的干预降低了icu中接受SUP的患者比例,但未显著影响明显胃肠道出血患者的比例。这些发现将有助于指导ICU的医疗决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Care Medicine
Critical Care Medicine 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
16.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
728
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Critical Care Medicine is the premier peer-reviewed, scientific publication in critical care medicine. Directed to those specialists who treat patients in the ICU and CCU, including chest physicians, surgeons, pediatricians, pharmacists/pharmacologists, anesthesiologists, critical care nurses, and other healthcare professionals, Critical Care Medicine covers all aspects of acute and emergency care for the critically ill or injured patient. Each issue presents critical care practitioners with clinical breakthroughs that lead to better patient care, the latest news on promising research, and advances in equipment and techniques.
期刊最新文献
Anti-Xa Levels With Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Critical Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Pancreatic Stone Protein: A Novel Contribution Toward Early Sepsis Recognition. Exposure to Antipsychotic Medication Is Associated With Less Days Alive and Free From Catatonia in Critically Ill Patients. "Catch My Drift?" Days Alive and at Home After Critical Illness Hospitalization Among Older Adults and Its Association With Delivery of In-Hospital Rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1