Data pharmacovigilance analysis of medroxyprogesterone-related adverse events in the FDA adverse event reporting system.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Expert Opinion on Drug Safety Pub Date : 2025-02-03 DOI:10.1080/14740338.2024.2446414
Xiaomeng Wang, Jimei Wang, Fang Liu, Kexin Zhang, Min Zhao, Lin Xu
{"title":"Data pharmacovigilance analysis of medroxyprogesterone-related adverse events in the FDA adverse event reporting system.","authors":"Xiaomeng Wang, Jimei Wang, Fang Liu, Kexin Zhang, Min Zhao, Lin Xu","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2446414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA), a steroid progesterone, is widely used to treat endometriosis, menstrual disorders, and uterine bleeding in clinical practice. However, the safety profile of MPA requires comprehensive evaluation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study performed a retrospective analysis using real-world data extracted from the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. Case reports from 2003 to 2023 were analyzed using methods like reporting advantage ratio (ROR), proportional report ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and empirical Bayes geometric mean (EBGM).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the case reports spanning from 2003 to 2023, showed 26,437 adverse events (AEs) related to MPA, mostly in females (25,639). Disproportionality analysis identified 116 ADRs across 19 system organ class (SOC) levels, including expected AEs like 'female breast cancer'(<i>n</i> = 8717) and 'ovarian cancer' (<i>n</i> = 459). Unexpected AEs, such as 'acquired diaphragmatic eventration'(<i>n</i> = 3), were also noted.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study identifies potential new and unexpected ADR signals linked to MPA, which align with clinical observations. Additional research is necessary to confirm these associations and address previously unrecognized safety concerns. This research provides a novel and distinctive approach to exploring drug-related AEs.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2024.2446414","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA), a steroid progesterone, is widely used to treat endometriosis, menstrual disorders, and uterine bleeding in clinical practice. However, the safety profile of MPA requires comprehensive evaluation.

Methods: This study performed a retrospective analysis using real-world data extracted from the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. Case reports from 2003 to 2023 were analyzed using methods like reporting advantage ratio (ROR), proportional report ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and empirical Bayes geometric mean (EBGM).

Results: In the case reports spanning from 2003 to 2023, showed 26,437 adverse events (AEs) related to MPA, mostly in females (25,639). Disproportionality analysis identified 116 ADRs across 19 system organ class (SOC) levels, including expected AEs like 'female breast cancer'(n = 8717) and 'ovarian cancer' (n = 459). Unexpected AEs, such as 'acquired diaphragmatic eventration'(n = 3), were also noted.

Conclusion: Our study identifies potential new and unexpected ADR signals linked to MPA, which align with clinical observations. Additional research is necessary to confirm these associations and address previously unrecognized safety concerns. This research provides a novel and distinctive approach to exploring drug-related AEs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Drug Safety ranks #62 of 216 in the Pharmacology & Pharmacy category in the 2008 ISI Journal Citation Reports. Expert Opinion on Drug Safety (ISSN 1474-0338 [print], 1744-764X [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles on all aspects of drug safety and original papers on the clinical implications of drug treatment safety issues, providing expert opinion on the scope for future development.
期刊最新文献
Drug-induced hyperacusis: a disproportionality analysis of the FAERS database. Drug-associated pancreatic cancer: insights from real-world pharmacovigilance and network pharmacology. Post-marketing safety monitoring of Tirzepatide: a pharmacovigilance study based on the FAERS database. Update of safety profile of levonorgestrel: a disproportionality analysis based on FAERS from 2004 to 2023. Incidence and risk of drug-induced interstitial lung disease associated with anti-neoplastic drugs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1