Data pharmacovigilance analysis of medroxyprogesterone-related adverse events in the FDA adverse event reporting system.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Expert Opinion on Drug Safety Pub Date : 2026-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-03 DOI:10.1080/14740338.2024.2446414
Xiaomeng Wang, Jimei Wang, Fang Liu, Kexin Zhang, Min Zhao, Lin Xu
{"title":"Data pharmacovigilance analysis of medroxyprogesterone-related adverse events in the FDA adverse event reporting system.","authors":"Xiaomeng Wang, Jimei Wang, Fang Liu, Kexin Zhang, Min Zhao, Lin Xu","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2446414","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA), a steroid progesterone, is widely used to treat endometriosis, menstrual disorders, and uterine bleeding in clinical practice. However, the safety profile of MPA requires comprehensive evaluation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study performed a retrospective analysis using real-world data extracted from the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. Case reports from 2003 to 2023 were analyzed using methods like reporting advantage ratio (ROR), proportional report ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and empirical Bayes geometric mean (EBGM).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the case reports spanning from 2003 to 2023, showed 26,437 adverse events (AEs) related to MPA, mostly in females (25,639). Disproportionality analysis identified 116 ADRs across 19 system organ class (SOC) levels, including expected AEs like 'female breast cancer'(<i>n</i> = 8717) and 'ovarian cancer' (<i>n</i> = 459). Unexpected AEs, such as 'acquired diaphragmatic eventration'(<i>n</i> = 3), were also noted.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study identifies potential new and unexpected ADR signals linked to MPA, which align with clinical observations. Additional research is necessary to confirm these associations and address previously unrecognized safety concerns. This research provides a novel and distinctive approach to exploring drug-related AEs.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"515-522"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2024.2446414","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA), a steroid progesterone, is widely used to treat endometriosis, menstrual disorders, and uterine bleeding in clinical practice. However, the safety profile of MPA requires comprehensive evaluation.

Methods: This study performed a retrospective analysis using real-world data extracted from the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. Case reports from 2003 to 2023 were analyzed using methods like reporting advantage ratio (ROR), proportional report ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and empirical Bayes geometric mean (EBGM).

Results: In the case reports spanning from 2003 to 2023, showed 26,437 adverse events (AEs) related to MPA, mostly in females (25,639). Disproportionality analysis identified 116 ADRs across 19 system organ class (SOC) levels, including expected AEs like 'female breast cancer'(n = 8717) and 'ovarian cancer' (n = 459). Unexpected AEs, such as 'acquired diaphragmatic eventration'(n = 3), were also noted.

Conclusion: Our study identifies potential new and unexpected ADR signals linked to MPA, which align with clinical observations. Additional research is necessary to confirm these associations and address previously unrecognized safety concerns. This research provides a novel and distinctive approach to exploring drug-related AEs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
FDA不良事件报告系统中甲羟孕酮相关不良事件的数据药物警戒分析
目的:醋酸甲羟孕酮(MPA)是一种甾体黄体酮,在临床上广泛用于治疗子宫内膜异位症、月经紊乱和子宫出血。然而,MPA的安全性需要综合评价。方法:本研究采用从美国食品和药物管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库中提取的真实数据进行回顾性分析。采用报告优势比(ROR)、比例报告比(PRR)、贝叶斯置信传播神经网络(BCPNN)和经验贝叶斯几何平均(EBGM)等方法对2003 - 2023年的病例报告进行分析。结果:在2003年至2023年的病例报告中,显示26,437例与MPA相关的不良事件(ae),其中大多数为女性(25,639)。歧化分析确定了19个系统器官类别(SOC)水平的116个不良反应,包括预期的不良反应,如“女性乳腺癌”(n = 8717)和“卵巢癌”(n = 459)。意料之外的不良事件,如“获得性膈肌通气”(n = 3)也被注意到。结论:我们的研究确定了与MPA相关的潜在的新的和意想不到的不良反应信号,这与临床观察相一致。需要进一步的研究来证实这些关联,并解决以前未被认识到的安全问题。本研究为探索药物相关ae提供了一种新颖而独特的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Drug Safety ranks #62 of 216 in the Pharmacology & Pharmacy category in the 2008 ISI Journal Citation Reports. Expert Opinion on Drug Safety (ISSN 1474-0338 [print], 1744-764X [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles on all aspects of drug safety and original papers on the clinical implications of drug treatment safety issues, providing expert opinion on the scope for future development.
期刊最新文献
The efficacy and safety of antithrombotic drug options in acute ischemic stroke. Safety concerns associated with various types of statins: a disproportionality analysis of the FAERS database. A novel, widespread impurity in mass-compounded tirzepatide/b12 products: patient safety implications. Refractory immune-related adverse events (irAes) associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: a multiorgan management review. Long-term safety and effectiveness of vonoprazan as maintenance therapy for reflux esophagitis in Japan: a 12-month post-marketing surveillance study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1