Review article: Coaching in emergency medicine: A systematic review and future research agenda

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Emergency Medicine Australasia Pub Date : 2025-01-30 DOI:10.1111/1742-6723.70001
Andrew Rixon B.Sc (hons), GCLT, FCHSM, PhD, Samuel Wilson BA, BCom, MPsych, PhD, Lee Yung Wong MBBS (hons), GradDipClinEd, FACEM, PhD, Elizabeth Elder BA, BN,MAdvPrac, MNurs, PhD
{"title":"Review article: Coaching in emergency medicine: A systematic review and future research agenda","authors":"Andrew Rixon B.Sc (hons), GCLT, FCHSM, PhD,&nbsp;Samuel Wilson BA, BCom, MPsych, PhD,&nbsp;Lee Yung Wong MBBS (hons), GradDipClinEd, FACEM, PhD,&nbsp;Elizabeth Elder BA, BN,MAdvPrac, MNurs, PhD","doi":"10.1111/1742-6723.70001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Coaching as a discipline has seen significant growth in medicine over the last decade, especially in medical education, but is at the early stages of recognition in emergency medicine. The objective of this systematic review was to provide insight into the state of coaching practice and research in emergency medicine and outline a future research agenda. Based on PRISMA guidelines, a structured electronic literature search of Embase, Scopus and EBSCOhost was conducted. Studies were included if they met all three criteria for population (‘clinicians’), concept (‘coaching’), context (‘emergency medicine’) and were published in peer-reviewed empirical studies between 2004 and 2024. Data extraction was performed by one investigator and checked for accuracy by a second investigator. A quality assessment was conducted. Of the 1441 unique articles identified in the initial search, 13 studies met the inclusion criteria. Our review revealed three key findings: coaching is examined in relation to clinician well-being and resilience, non-technical skills, and clinician technical skills, however its influence upon non-technical skills is the main focus; coaching studies are predominantly outcome studies, with process studies receiving little attention and; a range of theories and models are used in studies of coaching in emergency medicine. This review revealed that coaching research in emergency medicine is in its infancy, highly fragmented and largely disconnected from the wider coaching research literature. Nevertheless, despite the early stages of the current research base of coaching in emergency medicine, this nascent field is rich with opportunities for future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":11604,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Australasia","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11780483/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Medicine Australasia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1742-6723.70001","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Coaching as a discipline has seen significant growth in medicine over the last decade, especially in medical education, but is at the early stages of recognition in emergency medicine. The objective of this systematic review was to provide insight into the state of coaching practice and research in emergency medicine and outline a future research agenda. Based on PRISMA guidelines, a structured electronic literature search of Embase, Scopus and EBSCOhost was conducted. Studies were included if they met all three criteria for population (‘clinicians’), concept (‘coaching’), context (‘emergency medicine’) and were published in peer-reviewed empirical studies between 2004 and 2024. Data extraction was performed by one investigator and checked for accuracy by a second investigator. A quality assessment was conducted. Of the 1441 unique articles identified in the initial search, 13 studies met the inclusion criteria. Our review revealed three key findings: coaching is examined in relation to clinician well-being and resilience, non-technical skills, and clinician technical skills, however its influence upon non-technical skills is the main focus; coaching studies are predominantly outcome studies, with process studies receiving little attention and; a range of theories and models are used in studies of coaching in emergency medicine. This review revealed that coaching research in emergency medicine is in its infancy, highly fragmented and largely disconnected from the wider coaching research literature. Nevertheless, despite the early stages of the current research base of coaching in emergency medicine, this nascent field is rich with opportunities for future research.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
综述文章:急诊医学辅导:系统综述和未来研究议程。
在过去的十年里,教练作为一门学科在医学上有了显著的发展,尤其是在医学教育中,但在急诊医学中还处于认识的早期阶段。本系统综述的目的是提供对急诊医学教练实践和研究现状的洞察,并概述未来的研究议程。基于PRISMA指南,对Embase、Scopus和EBSCOhost进行结构化电子文献检索。如果研究符合人口(“临床医生”)、概念(“指导”)、背景(“急诊医学”)的所有三个标准,并且在2004年至2024年期间在同行评审的实证研究中发表,则纳入研究。数据提取由一名调查员进行,并由另一名调查员检查准确性。进行了质量评估。在最初的检索中发现的1441篇独特的文章中,有13篇研究符合纳入标准。我们的回顾揭示了三个关键发现:指导与临床医生的幸福感和弹性、非技术技能和临床医生的技术技能有关,但其对非技术技能的影响是主要焦点;教练研究主要是结果研究,过程研究很少受到关注;一系列的理论和模型被用于研究急诊医学的指导。这篇综述表明,急诊医学的教练研究还处于起步阶段,高度分散,与更广泛的教练研究文献很大程度上脱节。然而,尽管目前急诊医学指导的研究基础处于早期阶段,但这一新兴领域充满了未来研究的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Emergency Medicine Australasia
Emergency Medicine Australasia 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
13.00%
发文量
217
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Emergency Medicine Australasia is the official journal of the Australasian College for Emergency Medicine (ACEM) and the Australasian Society for Emergency Medicine (ASEM), and publishes original articles dealing with all aspects of clinical practice, research, education and experiences in emergency medicine. Original articles are published under the following sections: Original Research, Paediatric Emergency Medicine, Disaster Medicine, Education and Training, Ethics, International Emergency Medicine, Management and Quality, Medicolegal Matters, Prehospital Care, Public Health, Rural and Remote Care, Technology, Toxicology and Trauma. Accepted papers become the copyright of the journal.
期刊最新文献
Radiologist Approval for CTPA in the ED: A Single-Centre Pilot Study Did Not Demonstrate a Statistically Significant Difference in Diagnostic Yield The Effect of Increasing Age on Outcomes in Major Trauma: A Retrospective Cohort Study Self-Rostering for Emergency Career Medical Officers (CMOs) and Registrars Within a Small Metropolitan Emergency Department: A Mixed Methods Study on Employee Satisfaction and Implementation Processes A Survey of Workplace Violence in a New Zealand Emergency Department—Is the Current Reporting System Working? A Short Report Beyond ICD-10 M00–M99: Underestimated Prevalence of Musculoskeletal Conditions in Australian Emergency Departments
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1