Long COVID-19-related and non-COVID-19 postviral olfactory dysfunction a comparative MRI study focusing on the olfactory cleft and bulbs.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Frontiers in Neurology Pub Date : 2025-01-15 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fneur.2024.1535699
Yifan Li, Mengfan Liu, Ruoqi Zhang, Yibei Wang, Jianfeng Liu
{"title":"Long COVID-19-related and non-COVID-19 postviral olfactory dysfunction a comparative MRI study focusing on the olfactory cleft and bulbs.","authors":"Yifan Li, Mengfan Liu, Ruoqi Zhang, Yibei Wang, Jianfeng Liu","doi":"10.3389/fneur.2024.1535699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features of the olfactory cleft (OC) and olfactory bulbs (OBs) in patients with long COVID-19-related (LCOD) and non-COVID-19 postviral olfactory dysfunction (NCPVOD) to explore mechanisms underlying persistent olfactory dysfunction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective analysis included patients diagnosed with LCOD or NCPVOD at the China-Japan Friendship Hospital between February 2023 and July 2024. All patients underwent olfactory psychophysical testing (Sniffin' Sticks), a visual analogue scale (VAS) for olfactory function, and high-resolution MRI scans of the olfactory pathway. MRI features, including OC opacity, OB morphology, OB volume, and olfactory sulcus depth, were compared between groups. Correlations between MRI findings and olfactory test scores were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy patients were included (35 LCOD, 35 NCPVOD). LCOD patients had significantly higher OC opacity scores than NCPVOD patients (<i>p</i> < 0.001). No significant differences were found in OB morphology, abnormal OB signals, OB volume reduction, or distances between OBs and surrounding structures (<i>p</i> > 0.05). LCOD patients had significantly greater right olfactory sulcus depth than NCPVOD patients (<i>p</i> = 0.026), with negative correlation to age (r = -0.25, <i>p</i> = 0.04). OB volumes positively correlated with TDI and VAS scores.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LCOD patients exhibited greater OC opacity than NCPVOD patients, suggesting OC inflammation may contribute to persistent olfactory dysfunction. Treating inflammation in the OC could improve long-term olfactory outcomes. OB volume reduction was common in both groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":12575,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Neurology","volume":"15 ","pages":"1535699"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11774702/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2024.1535699","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) features of the olfactory cleft (OC) and olfactory bulbs (OBs) in patients with long COVID-19-related (LCOD) and non-COVID-19 postviral olfactory dysfunction (NCPVOD) to explore mechanisms underlying persistent olfactory dysfunction.

Methods: This retrospective analysis included patients diagnosed with LCOD or NCPVOD at the China-Japan Friendship Hospital between February 2023 and July 2024. All patients underwent olfactory psychophysical testing (Sniffin' Sticks), a visual analogue scale (VAS) for olfactory function, and high-resolution MRI scans of the olfactory pathway. MRI features, including OC opacity, OB morphology, OB volume, and olfactory sulcus depth, were compared between groups. Correlations between MRI findings and olfactory test scores were assessed.

Results: Seventy patients were included (35 LCOD, 35 NCPVOD). LCOD patients had significantly higher OC opacity scores than NCPVOD patients (p < 0.001). No significant differences were found in OB morphology, abnormal OB signals, OB volume reduction, or distances between OBs and surrounding structures (p > 0.05). LCOD patients had significantly greater right olfactory sulcus depth than NCPVOD patients (p = 0.026), with negative correlation to age (r = -0.25, p = 0.04). OB volumes positively correlated with TDI and VAS scores.

Conclusion: LCOD patients exhibited greater OC opacity than NCPVOD patients, suggesting OC inflammation may contribute to persistent olfactory dysfunction. Treating inflammation in the OC could improve long-term olfactory outcomes. OB volume reduction was common in both groups.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Neurology
Frontiers in Neurology CLINICAL NEUROLOGYNEUROSCIENCES -NEUROSCIENCES
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.80%
发文量
2792
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: The section Stroke aims to quickly and accurately publish important experimental, translational and clinical studies, and reviews that contribute to the knowledge of stroke, its causes, manifestations, diagnosis, and management.
期刊最新文献
Editorial: Neural correlates of connected speech indices in acquired neurological disorders. Enhancing ALS disease management: exploring integrated user value through online communities evidence. Use of amantadine in traumatic brain injury: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Development and validation of a diagnostic model for migraine without aura in inpatients. Editorial: Translational neuroeconomic approach: from economic decision making to neuropsychological disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1