Thomas F Parkerton, Aaron D Redman, Daniel J Letinski, Magdalena I Rakowska, Danny D Reible
{"title":"Integrating ex situ biomimetic extraction analyses into contaminated sediment assessment and management decisions.","authors":"Thomas F Parkerton, Aaron D Redman, Daniel J Letinski, Magdalena I Rakowska, Danny D Reible","doi":"10.1093/inteam/vjae008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study evaluated a novel ex situ passive sampling biomimetic extraction (BE) method to estimate toxic potency in sediments. Gas chromatography with flame ionization detection (GC-FID) analysis of polydimethylsiloxane fibers equilibrated with field sediments was used to quantify bioavailable polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and other unresolved, site-specific contaminant mixtures. This method is biomimetic because contaminants partition to the fiber based on hydrophobicity and abundance, and GC-FID quantification accounts for all constituents absorbed to the fiber that may contribute to toxicity. This measurement was compared with conventional approaches that rely on bulk sediment or porewater measurements of a targeted suite of PAHs. The specific objectives of the study were to (1) describe the BE method and explain measurement translation into toxic units (TUs); (2) report sediment BE data collected across 17 diverse field sites; (3) compare TUs predicted from (i) equilibrium partitioning (EqP) calculations based on sediment total organic carbon and bulk PAH chemistry, (ii) PAH porewater concentrations derived using ex situ passive sampling, and (iii) BE concentrations; and (4) discuss implications of this analysis for benthic toxicity assessment. Results showed that TUs obtained from EqP calculations were typically 10× higher than TUs derived from measured porewater PAH concentrations, indicating reduced PAH bioavailability in field sediments. Toxic units derived using the new BE method were more conservative than EqP in one-third of the sediments investigated, which was attributed to unquantified sediment contaminants, possible fiber fouling in the more contaminated sediments, and potential background interferences in less contaminated sediments. Preliminary data are also presented, showing that fluorometric analysis provides a simpler, promising alternative for estimating sediment BE concentrations. Based on this analysis, a decision-support framework is proposed using EqP and BE based TU metrics. Future research priorities are described for supporting framework implementation and extending use of BE analyses to remedial design and monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":13557,"journal":{"name":"Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management","volume":"21 1","pages":"195-207"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11804877/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/inteam/vjae008","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study evaluated a novel ex situ passive sampling biomimetic extraction (BE) method to estimate toxic potency in sediments. Gas chromatography with flame ionization detection (GC-FID) analysis of polydimethylsiloxane fibers equilibrated with field sediments was used to quantify bioavailable polyaromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and other unresolved, site-specific contaminant mixtures. This method is biomimetic because contaminants partition to the fiber based on hydrophobicity and abundance, and GC-FID quantification accounts for all constituents absorbed to the fiber that may contribute to toxicity. This measurement was compared with conventional approaches that rely on bulk sediment or porewater measurements of a targeted suite of PAHs. The specific objectives of the study were to (1) describe the BE method and explain measurement translation into toxic units (TUs); (2) report sediment BE data collected across 17 diverse field sites; (3) compare TUs predicted from (i) equilibrium partitioning (EqP) calculations based on sediment total organic carbon and bulk PAH chemistry, (ii) PAH porewater concentrations derived using ex situ passive sampling, and (iii) BE concentrations; and (4) discuss implications of this analysis for benthic toxicity assessment. Results showed that TUs obtained from EqP calculations were typically 10× higher than TUs derived from measured porewater PAH concentrations, indicating reduced PAH bioavailability in field sediments. Toxic units derived using the new BE method were more conservative than EqP in one-third of the sediments investigated, which was attributed to unquantified sediment contaminants, possible fiber fouling in the more contaminated sediments, and potential background interferences in less contaminated sediments. Preliminary data are also presented, showing that fluorometric analysis provides a simpler, promising alternative for estimating sediment BE concentrations. Based on this analysis, a decision-support framework is proposed using EqP and BE based TU metrics. Future research priorities are described for supporting framework implementation and extending use of BE analyses to remedial design and monitoring.
期刊介绍:
Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management (IEAM) publishes the science underpinning environmental decision making and problem solving. Papers submitted to IEAM must link science and technical innovations to vexing regional or global environmental issues in one or more of the following core areas:
Science-informed regulation, policy, and decision making
Health and ecological risk and impact assessment
Restoration and management of damaged ecosystems
Sustaining ecosystems
Managing large-scale environmental change
Papers published in these broad fields of study are connected by an array of interdisciplinary engineering, management, and scientific themes, which collectively reflect the interconnectedness of the scientific, social, and environmental challenges facing our modern global society:
Methods for environmental quality assessment; forecasting across a number of ecosystem uses and challenges (systems-based, cost-benefit, ecosystem services, etc.); measuring or predicting ecosystem change and adaptation
Approaches that connect policy and management tools; harmonize national and international environmental regulation; merge human well-being with ecological management; develop and sustain the function of ecosystems; conceptualize, model and apply concepts of spatial and regional sustainability
Assessment and management frameworks that incorporate conservation, life cycle, restoration, and sustainability; considerations for climate-induced adaptation, change and consequences, and vulnerability
Environmental management applications using risk-based approaches; considerations for protecting and fostering biodiversity, as well as enhancement or protection of ecosystem services and resiliency.