Transformers for Neuroimage Segmentation: Scoping Review.

IF 6 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Medical Internet Research Pub Date : 2025-01-29 DOI:10.2196/57723
Maya Iratni, Amira Abdullah, Mariam Aldhaheri, Omar Elharrouss, Alaa Abd-Alrazaq, Zahiriddin Rustamov, Nazar Zaki, Rafat Damseh
{"title":"Transformers for Neuroimage Segmentation: Scoping Review.","authors":"Maya Iratni, Amira Abdullah, Mariam Aldhaheri, Omar Elharrouss, Alaa Abd-Alrazaq, Zahiriddin Rustamov, Nazar Zaki, Rafat Damseh","doi":"10.2196/57723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Neuroimaging segmentation is increasingly important for diagnosing and planning treatments for neurological diseases. Manual segmentation is time-consuming, apart from being prone to human error and variability. Transformers are a promising deep learning approach for automated medical image segmentation.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This scoping review will synthesize current literature and assess the use of various transformer models for neuroimaging segmentation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search in major databases, including Scopus, IEEE Xplore, PubMed, and ACM Digital Library, was carried out for studies applying transformers to neuroimaging segmentation problems from 2019 through 2023. The inclusion criteria allow only for peer-reviewed journal papers and conference papers focused on transformer-based segmentation of human brain imaging data. Excluded are the studies dealing with nonneuroimaging data or raw brain signals and electroencephalogram data. Data extraction was performed to identify key study details, including image modalities, datasets, neurological conditions, transformer models, and evaluation metrics. Results were synthesized using a narrative approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1246 publications identified, 67 (5.38%) met the inclusion criteria. Half of all included studies were published in 2022, and more than two-thirds used transformers for segmenting brain tumors. The most common imaging modality was magnetic resonance imaging (n=59, 88.06%), while the most frequently used dataset was brain tumor segmentation dataset (n=39, 58.21%). 3D transformer models (n=42, 62.69%) were more prevalent than their 2D counterparts. The most developed were those of hybrid convolutional neural network-transformer architectures (n=57, 85.07%), where the vision transformer is the most frequently used type of transformer (n=37, 55.22%). The most frequent evaluation metric was the Dice score (n=63, 94.03%). Studies generally reported increased segmentation accuracy and the ability to model both local and global features in brain images.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review represents the recent increase in the adoption of transformers for neuroimaging segmentation, particularly for brain tumor detection. Currently, hybrid convolutional neural network-transformer architectures achieve state-of-the-art performances on benchmark datasets over standalone models. Nevertheless, their applicability remains highly limited by high computational costs and potential overfitting on small datasets. The heavy reliance of the field on the brain tumor segmentation dataset hints at the use of a more diverse set of datasets to validate the performances of models on a variety of neurological diseases. Further research is needed to define the optimal transformer architectures and training methods for clinical applications. Continuing development may make transformers the state-of-the-art for fast, accurate, and reliable brain magnetic resonance imaging segmentation, which could lead to improved clinical tools for diagnosing and evaluating neurological disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":16337,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Internet Research","volume":"27 ","pages":"e57723"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11822320/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Internet Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/57723","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Neuroimaging segmentation is increasingly important for diagnosing and planning treatments for neurological diseases. Manual segmentation is time-consuming, apart from being prone to human error and variability. Transformers are a promising deep learning approach for automated medical image segmentation.

Objective: This scoping review will synthesize current literature and assess the use of various transformer models for neuroimaging segmentation.

Methods: A systematic search in major databases, including Scopus, IEEE Xplore, PubMed, and ACM Digital Library, was carried out for studies applying transformers to neuroimaging segmentation problems from 2019 through 2023. The inclusion criteria allow only for peer-reviewed journal papers and conference papers focused on transformer-based segmentation of human brain imaging data. Excluded are the studies dealing with nonneuroimaging data or raw brain signals and electroencephalogram data. Data extraction was performed to identify key study details, including image modalities, datasets, neurological conditions, transformer models, and evaluation metrics. Results were synthesized using a narrative approach.

Results: Of the 1246 publications identified, 67 (5.38%) met the inclusion criteria. Half of all included studies were published in 2022, and more than two-thirds used transformers for segmenting brain tumors. The most common imaging modality was magnetic resonance imaging (n=59, 88.06%), while the most frequently used dataset was brain tumor segmentation dataset (n=39, 58.21%). 3D transformer models (n=42, 62.69%) were more prevalent than their 2D counterparts. The most developed were those of hybrid convolutional neural network-transformer architectures (n=57, 85.07%), where the vision transformer is the most frequently used type of transformer (n=37, 55.22%). The most frequent evaluation metric was the Dice score (n=63, 94.03%). Studies generally reported increased segmentation accuracy and the ability to model both local and global features in brain images.

Conclusions: This review represents the recent increase in the adoption of transformers for neuroimaging segmentation, particularly for brain tumor detection. Currently, hybrid convolutional neural network-transformer architectures achieve state-of-the-art performances on benchmark datasets over standalone models. Nevertheless, their applicability remains highly limited by high computational costs and potential overfitting on small datasets. The heavy reliance of the field on the brain tumor segmentation dataset hints at the use of a more diverse set of datasets to validate the performances of models on a variety of neurological diseases. Further research is needed to define the optimal transformer architectures and training methods for clinical applications. Continuing development may make transformers the state-of-the-art for fast, accurate, and reliable brain magnetic resonance imaging segmentation, which could lead to improved clinical tools for diagnosing and evaluating neurological disorders.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
神经图像分割变压器:范围审查。
背景:神经影像分割对神经系统疾病的诊断和治疗计划越来越重要。手动分割除了容易出现人为错误和可变性外,还很耗时。变形金刚是一种很有前途的用于自动医学图像分割的深度学习方法。目的:本综述将综合目前的文献并评估各种变压器模型在神经成像分割中的应用。方法:系统检索Scopus、IEEE Xplore、PubMed和ACM数字图书馆等主要数据库,检索2019 - 2023年将transformer应用于神经成像分割问题的研究。纳入标准只允许同行评议的期刊论文和会议论文,重点是基于变压器的人脑成像数据分割。排除了处理非神经影像学数据或原始脑信号和脑电图数据的研究。进行数据提取以确定关键的研究细节,包括图像模式、数据集、神经系统状况、变压器模型和评估指标。使用叙述方法综合结果。结果:1246篇文献中,67篇(5.38%)符合纳入标准。在所有纳入的研究中,有一半发表于2022年,超过三分之二的研究使用变压器来分割脑肿瘤。最常见的成像方式是磁共振成像(n=59, 88.06%),最常用的数据集是脑肿瘤分割数据集(n=39, 58.21%)。3D变压器模型(n=42, 62.69%)比2D变压器模型更为普遍。最发达的是混合卷积神经网络-变压器架构(n=57, 85.07%),其中视觉变压器是最常用的变压器类型(n=37, 55.22%)。最常见的评价指标是Dice得分(n= 63,94.03%)。研究普遍报告了分割精度的提高和对脑图像局部和全局特征建模的能力。结论:这篇综述反映了最近在神经成像分割中,特别是脑肿瘤检测中,变压器的采用有所增加。目前,混合卷积神经网络变压器架构在基准数据集上比独立模型实现了最先进的性能。然而,它们的适用性仍然受到高计算成本和对小数据集的潜在过拟合的高度限制。该领域对脑肿瘤分割数据集的严重依赖暗示着需要使用更多样化的数据集来验证模型在各种神经系统疾病上的性能。需要进一步的研究来确定最佳的变压器结构和临床应用的训练方法。持续的发展可能会使变压器成为快速、准确、可靠的脑磁共振成像分割的最先进技术,这可能会改善诊断和评估神经系统疾病的临床工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
5.40%
发文量
654
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Medical Internet Research (JMIR) is a highly respected publication in the field of health informatics and health services. With a founding date in 1999, JMIR has been a pioneer in the field for over two decades. As a leader in the industry, the journal focuses on digital health, data science, health informatics, and emerging technologies for health, medicine, and biomedical research. It is recognized as a top publication in these disciplines, ranking in the first quartile (Q1) by Impact Factor. Notably, JMIR holds the prestigious position of being ranked #1 on Google Scholar within the "Medical Informatics" discipline.
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of Educational Videos in Encouraging Preferences for Guideline-Based Cancer Screening in Japan: Three-Arm Pseudorandomized Controlled Trial. Correction: Characterization of Models for Identifying Physical and Cognitive Frailty in Older Adults With Diabetes: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Genre-Specific Gaming Addiction and Flourishing in Adolescents: Cross-Sectional Survey Study. Correction: Integrating Text and Image Analysis: Exploring GPT-4V's Capabilities in Advanced Radiological Applications Across Subspecialties. Text-Based Depression Estimation Using Machine Learning With Standard Labels: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1