A novel machine learning-based cancer-specific CVD risk score among patients with breast, colorectal, or lung cancer.

IF 3.4 Q2 ONCOLOGY JNCI Cancer Spectrum Pub Date : 2025-01-30 DOI:10.1093/jncics/pkaf016
Nickolas Stabellini, Omar M Makram, Harikrishnan Hyma Kunhiraman, Hisham Daoud, John Shanahan, Alberto J Montero, Roger S Blumenthal, Charu Aggarwal, Umang Swami, Salim S Virani, Vanita Noronha, Neeraj Agarwal, Susan Dent, Avirup Guha
{"title":"A novel machine learning-based cancer-specific CVD risk score among patients with breast, colorectal, or lung cancer.","authors":"Nickolas Stabellini, Omar M Makram, Harikrishnan Hyma Kunhiraman, Hisham Daoud, John Shanahan, Alberto J Montero, Roger S Blumenthal, Charu Aggarwal, Umang Swami, Salim S Virani, Vanita Noronha, Neeraj Agarwal, Susan Dent, Avirup Guha","doi":"10.1093/jncics/pkaf016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cancer patients have up to a 3-fold higher risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) than the general population. Traditional CVD risk scores may be less accurate for them. We aimed to develop cancer-specific CVD risk scores and compare them with conventional scores in predicting 10-year CVD risk for patients with breast cancer (BC), colorectal cancer (CRC), or lung cancer (LC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed adults diagnosed with BC, CRC, or LC between 2005-2012. An ML Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) algorithm ranked 40-50 covariates for predicting CVD for each cancer type using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values. The top 10 ML-predictors were used to create predictive equations using logistic regression and compared to ACC/AHA Pooled Cohort Equations (PCE), Predicting Risk of cardiovascular disease EVENTs (PREVENT), and Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation-2 (SCORE2) using the area under the curve (AUC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 10,339 patients: 55.5% had BC, 15.6% had CRC, and 29.7% had LC. The actual 10-year CVD rates were: BC 21%, CRC 10%, and LC 28%. The predictors derived from the ML algorithm included cancer-specific and socioeconomic factors. The cancer-specific predictive scores achieved AUCs of 0.84, 0.76, and 0.83 for BC, CRC, and LC, respectively, and outperformed PCE, PREVENT and SCORE2, increasing the absolute AUC values by up to 0.31 points (with AUC ranging from 0 to 1). Similar results were found when excluding patients with cardiac history or advanced cancer from the analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion(s): </strong>Cancer-specific CVD predictive scores outperform conventional scores and emphasize the importance of integrating cancer-related covariates for precise prediction.</p>","PeriodicalId":14681,"journal":{"name":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkaf016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cancer patients have up to a 3-fold higher risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) than the general population. Traditional CVD risk scores may be less accurate for them. We aimed to develop cancer-specific CVD risk scores and compare them with conventional scores in predicting 10-year CVD risk for patients with breast cancer (BC), colorectal cancer (CRC), or lung cancer (LC).

Methods: We analyzed adults diagnosed with BC, CRC, or LC between 2005-2012. An ML Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) algorithm ranked 40-50 covariates for predicting CVD for each cancer type using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values. The top 10 ML-predictors were used to create predictive equations using logistic regression and compared to ACC/AHA Pooled Cohort Equations (PCE), Predicting Risk of cardiovascular disease EVENTs (PREVENT), and Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation-2 (SCORE2) using the area under the curve (AUC).

Results: We included 10,339 patients: 55.5% had BC, 15.6% had CRC, and 29.7% had LC. The actual 10-year CVD rates were: BC 21%, CRC 10%, and LC 28%. The predictors derived from the ML algorithm included cancer-specific and socioeconomic factors. The cancer-specific predictive scores achieved AUCs of 0.84, 0.76, and 0.83 for BC, CRC, and LC, respectively, and outperformed PCE, PREVENT and SCORE2, increasing the absolute AUC values by up to 0.31 points (with AUC ranging from 0 to 1). Similar results were found when excluding patients with cardiac history or advanced cancer from the analysis.

Conclusion(s): Cancer-specific CVD predictive scores outperform conventional scores and emphasize the importance of integrating cancer-related covariates for precise prediction.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
JNCI Cancer Spectrum Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
Alcohol consumption, polygenic risk score and the risk of colorectal neoplasia. Genome-wide association study and Mendelian randomization analyses reveal insights into bladder cancer etiology. Assessing impact of a community-based screening campaign to address social determinants of cervical cancer. A novel machine learning-based cancer-specific CVD risk score among patients with breast, colorectal, or lung cancer. Cancer risk in carriers of TP53 germline variants grouped into different functional categories.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1