The Effects of Self-Monitoring Using a Smartwatch and Smartphone App on Stress Awareness, Self-Efficacy, and Well-Being-Related Outcomes in Police Officers: Longitudinal Mixed Design Study.

IF 6.2 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES JMIR mHealth and uHealth Pub Date : 2025-01-28 DOI:10.2196/60708
Herman Jaap de Vries, Roos Delahaij, Marianne van Zwieten, Helen Verhoef, Wim Kamphuis
{"title":"The Effects of Self-Monitoring Using a Smartwatch and Smartphone App on Stress Awareness, Self-Efficacy, and Well-Being-Related Outcomes in Police Officers: Longitudinal Mixed Design Study.","authors":"Herman Jaap de Vries, Roos Delahaij, Marianne van Zwieten, Helen Verhoef, Wim Kamphuis","doi":"10.2196/60708","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Wearable sensor technologies, often referred to as \"wearables,\" have seen a rapid rise in consumer interest in recent years. Initially often seen as \"activity trackers,\" wearables have gradually expanded to also estimate sleep, stress, and physiological recovery. In occupational settings, there is a growing interest in applying this technology to promote health and well-being, especially in professions with highly demanding working conditions such as first responders. However, it is not clear to what extent self-monitoring with wearables can positively influence stress- and well-being-related outcomes in real-life conditions and how wearable-based interventions should be designed for high-risk professionals.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to investigate (1) whether offering a 5-week wearable-based intervention improves stress- and well-being-related outcomes in police officers and (2) whether extending a basic \"off-the-shelf\" wearable-based intervention with ecological momentary assessment (EMA) questionnaires, weekly personalized feedback reports, and peer support groups improves its effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 95 police officers from 5 offices participated in the study. The data of 79 participants were included for analysis. During the first 5 weeks, participants used no self-monitoring technology (control period). During the following 5 weeks (intervention period), 41 participants used a Garmin Forerunner 255 smartwatch with a custom-built app (comparable to that of the consumer-available wearable), whereas the other 38 participants used the same system, but complemented by daily EMA questionnaires, weekly personalized feedback reports, and access to peer support groups. At baseline (T0) and after the control (T1) and intervention (T2) periods, questionnaires were administered to measure 15 outcomes relating to stress awareness, stress management self-efficacy, and outcomes related to stress and general well-being. Linear mixed models that accounted for repeated measures within subjects, the control and intervention periods, and between-group differences were used to address both research questions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results of the first analysis showed that the intervention had a small (absolute Hedges g=0.25-0.46) but consistent effect on 8 of 15 of the stress- and well-being-related outcomes in comparison to the control group. The second analysis provided mixed results; the extended intervention was more effective than the basic intervention at improving recovery after work but less effective at improving self-efficacy in behavior change and sleep issues, and similarly effective in the remaining 12 outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Offering a 5-week wearable-based intervention to police officers can positively contribute to optimizing their stress-related, self-efficacy, and well-being-related outcomes. Complementing the basic \"off-the-shelf\" wearable-based intervention with additional EMA questionnaires, weekly personalized feedback reports, and peer support groups did not appear to improve the effectiveness of the intervention. Future work is needed to investigate how different aspects of these interventions can be tailored to specific characteristics and needs of employees to optimize these effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":14756,"journal":{"name":"JMIR mHealth and uHealth","volume":"13 ","pages":"e60708"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11793834/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR mHealth and uHealth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/60708","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Wearable sensor technologies, often referred to as "wearables," have seen a rapid rise in consumer interest in recent years. Initially often seen as "activity trackers," wearables have gradually expanded to also estimate sleep, stress, and physiological recovery. In occupational settings, there is a growing interest in applying this technology to promote health and well-being, especially in professions with highly demanding working conditions such as first responders. However, it is not clear to what extent self-monitoring with wearables can positively influence stress- and well-being-related outcomes in real-life conditions and how wearable-based interventions should be designed for high-risk professionals.

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate (1) whether offering a 5-week wearable-based intervention improves stress- and well-being-related outcomes in police officers and (2) whether extending a basic "off-the-shelf" wearable-based intervention with ecological momentary assessment (EMA) questionnaires, weekly personalized feedback reports, and peer support groups improves its effectiveness.

Methods: A total of 95 police officers from 5 offices participated in the study. The data of 79 participants were included for analysis. During the first 5 weeks, participants used no self-monitoring technology (control period). During the following 5 weeks (intervention period), 41 participants used a Garmin Forerunner 255 smartwatch with a custom-built app (comparable to that of the consumer-available wearable), whereas the other 38 participants used the same system, but complemented by daily EMA questionnaires, weekly personalized feedback reports, and access to peer support groups. At baseline (T0) and after the control (T1) and intervention (T2) periods, questionnaires were administered to measure 15 outcomes relating to stress awareness, stress management self-efficacy, and outcomes related to stress and general well-being. Linear mixed models that accounted for repeated measures within subjects, the control and intervention periods, and between-group differences were used to address both research questions.

Results: The results of the first analysis showed that the intervention had a small (absolute Hedges g=0.25-0.46) but consistent effect on 8 of 15 of the stress- and well-being-related outcomes in comparison to the control group. The second analysis provided mixed results; the extended intervention was more effective than the basic intervention at improving recovery after work but less effective at improving self-efficacy in behavior change and sleep issues, and similarly effective in the remaining 12 outcomes.

Conclusions: Offering a 5-week wearable-based intervention to police officers can positively contribute to optimizing their stress-related, self-efficacy, and well-being-related outcomes. Complementing the basic "off-the-shelf" wearable-based intervention with additional EMA questionnaires, weekly personalized feedback reports, and peer support groups did not appear to improve the effectiveness of the intervention. Future work is needed to investigate how different aspects of these interventions can be tailored to specific characteristics and needs of employees to optimize these effects.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用智能手表和智能手机App进行自我监控对警察压力意识、自我效能感和幸福相关结果的影响:纵向混合设计研究
背景:可穿戴传感器技术,通常被称为“可穿戴设备”,近年来在消费者的兴趣迅速上升。最初通常被视为“活动追踪器”,可穿戴设备逐渐扩展到评估睡眠、压力和生理恢复。在职业环境中,人们越来越有兴趣应用这项技术来促进健康和福祉,特别是在工作条件要求很高的职业中,如急救人员。然而,目前尚不清楚在现实生活中,使用可穿戴设备进行自我监控能在多大程度上对压力和健康相关的结果产生积极影响,也不清楚应该如何为高风险专业人士设计基于可穿戴设备的干预措施。目的:本研究的目的是调查(1)提供为期5周的基于可穿戴设备的干预是否能改善警察的压力和幸福感相关结果;(2)扩展一个基本的“现成”基于可穿戴设备的干预,包括生态瞬间评估(EMA)问卷、每周个性化反馈报告和同伴支持小组,是否能提高其有效性。方法:对来自5个分局的95名警官进行问卷调查。79名参与者的数据被纳入分析。在前5周,参与者没有使用自我监控技术(对照期)。在接下来的5周(干预期),41名参与者使用了带有定制应用程序的Garmin pioneer 255智能手表(与消费者可穿戴设备相当),而其他38名参与者使用了相同的系统,但每天都有EMA问卷,每周个性化反馈报告,并可以访问同伴支持小组。在基线期(T0)、对照期(T1)和干预期(T2)后,进行问卷调查,以测量与压力意识、压力管理自我效能以及与压力和总体幸福感相关的15项结果。线性混合模型用于解决这两个研究问题,该模型考虑了受试者内部的重复测量、控制和干预期以及组间差异。结果:第一次分析的结果显示,与对照组相比,干预对15个压力和幸福相关结果中的8个有很小的影响(绝对赫奇斯g=0.25-0.46),但效果一致。第二次分析提供了不同的结果;延长干预在改善工作后的恢复方面比基本干预更有效,但在提高行为改变和睡眠问题的自我效能方面效果较差,在其余12项结果中效果相似。结论:为警察提供为期5周的可穿戴干预,对优化他们的压力相关、自我效能和幸福相关的结果有积极的作用。用额外的EMA问卷、每周个性化反馈报告和同伴支持小组来补充基本的“现成的”基于可穿戴设备的干预措施,似乎并没有提高干预的有效性。未来的工作需要调查这些干预措施的不同方面如何针对员工的特定特征和需求进行定制,以优化这些效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JMIR mHealth and uHealth
JMIR mHealth and uHealth Medicine-Health Informatics
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
4.00%
发文量
159
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: JMIR mHealth and uHealth (JMU, ISSN 2291-5222) is a spin-off journal of JMIR, the leading eHealth journal (Impact Factor 2016: 5.175). JMIR mHealth and uHealth is indexed in PubMed, PubMed Central, and Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE), and in June 2017 received a stunning inaugural Impact Factor of 4.636. The journal focusses on health and biomedical applications in mobile and tablet computing, pervasive and ubiquitous computing, wearable computing and domotics. JMIR mHealth and uHealth publishes since 2013 and was the first mhealth journal in Pubmed. It publishes even faster and has a broader scope with including papers which are more technical or more formative/developmental than what would be published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research.
期刊最新文献
Development and Validation of a Novel Lymphedema Monitoring System Using a Bodysuit and a Smartphone: Prospective Comparative Study. Monitoring Respiratory Health in Children With Acute Asthma Using Wearable Electrical Bioimpedance and Breath Sounds: Observational Case-Control Study. Distinguishing Common Digital Phenotyping and Self-Report Parameters for Monitoring and Predicting Depression: Scoping Review. Digital Health Interventions in Children and Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus and Their Impact on Clinical and Behavioral Outcomes: Scoping Review. Identifying and Evaluating Patient-Centered Mobile and Web Apps for Patients With Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria: Systematic Search and Content Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1