Efficacy of ground herb-based and essential oil-based phytobiotics on the intestinal health and performance of nursery pigs challenged with F18+ Escherichia coli.
Yesid Garavito-Duarte, Marcos Elias Duarte, Sung Woo Kim
{"title":"Efficacy of ground herb-based and essential oil-based phytobiotics on the intestinal health and performance of nursery pigs challenged with F18+ Escherichia coli.","authors":"Yesid Garavito-Duarte, Marcos Elias Duarte, Sung Woo Kim","doi":"10.1093/jas/skaf018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of using ground herb-based phytobiotics and essential oil-based phytobiotics in pig diets on intestinal health and growth performance (GP) of nursery pigs challenged with F18+ Escherichia coli (E. coli). Forty nursery pigs (6.4 ± 0.1 kg) at 21 d of age were individually housed and assigned to 4 dietary treatments in a randomized complete block design, with body weight (BW) and sex as blocking factor. Basal diets were fed to pigs for 28 d in 3 phases. Treatments were NC: basal diet, non-challenged; PC: basal diet, challenged with F18+ E. coli; HP: PC + 1% ground herb-based phytobiotics (Salcochek Pro, Ayurvet Limited, Kaushambi, India); EP: PC + 1% essential oil-based phytobiotics (Liq-biotic, Ayurvet Limited, Kaushambi, India). The GP was recorded for each phase and fecal score (FS) was measured daily. On d 7 post-weaning, the challenged groups were orally inoculated with F18+ E. coli (2.0 × 1010 CFU), the NC treatment received sterile saline solution. On d 28, pigs were euthanized to collect jejunal samples to evaluate intestinal health and relative abundance (RA) of jejunal mucosa-associated microbiota. Data were analyzed using the MIXED procedure on SAS 9.4. The PC increased (P < 0.05) the RA of Prevotellaceae, Lachnospiraceae, and Ruminococcaceae when compared to NC. The HP reduced (P < 0.05) the RA of Veillonellaceae, Prevotellaceae, and Lachnospiraceae when compared to PC. The EP tended to reduce the RA of Streptococcaceae (P = 0.073) and Corynebacteriaceae (P = 0.074) when compared to PC. The PC increased (P < 0.05) occludin and tended to increase (P = 0.096) toll like-receptor-4 (TLR4) when compared to NC. The PC decreased (P < 0.05) average daily gain and average daily feed intake when compared to NC in d 7 to d 28. The PC increased FS (P < 0.05) compared to the HP and EP d 7 to d 11. The HP and EP decreased (P < 0.05) FS when compared to PC during d 7 to d 11 and d 7 to d 18. In conclusion, F18+ E. coli challenge disrupted the jejunal mucosa-associated microbiota, increased TLR4 expression and FS, consequently reduced GP. Both HP and EP phytobiotics supported intestinal morphology during the challenge to F18+ E. coli by supporting enterocyte maturation. The HP and EP treatments exhibited antimicrobial-like effects by altering the jejunal mucosa-associated microbiota and reduced FS during the first two weeks post-challenge. The HP treatment showed potential antioxidant effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":14895,"journal":{"name":"Journal of animal science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of animal science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skaf018","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of using ground herb-based phytobiotics and essential oil-based phytobiotics in pig diets on intestinal health and growth performance (GP) of nursery pigs challenged with F18+ Escherichia coli (E. coli). Forty nursery pigs (6.4 ± 0.1 kg) at 21 d of age were individually housed and assigned to 4 dietary treatments in a randomized complete block design, with body weight (BW) and sex as blocking factor. Basal diets were fed to pigs for 28 d in 3 phases. Treatments were NC: basal diet, non-challenged; PC: basal diet, challenged with F18+ E. coli; HP: PC + 1% ground herb-based phytobiotics (Salcochek Pro, Ayurvet Limited, Kaushambi, India); EP: PC + 1% essential oil-based phytobiotics (Liq-biotic, Ayurvet Limited, Kaushambi, India). The GP was recorded for each phase and fecal score (FS) was measured daily. On d 7 post-weaning, the challenged groups were orally inoculated with F18+ E. coli (2.0 × 1010 CFU), the NC treatment received sterile saline solution. On d 28, pigs were euthanized to collect jejunal samples to evaluate intestinal health and relative abundance (RA) of jejunal mucosa-associated microbiota. Data were analyzed using the MIXED procedure on SAS 9.4. The PC increased (P < 0.05) the RA of Prevotellaceae, Lachnospiraceae, and Ruminococcaceae when compared to NC. The HP reduced (P < 0.05) the RA of Veillonellaceae, Prevotellaceae, and Lachnospiraceae when compared to PC. The EP tended to reduce the RA of Streptococcaceae (P = 0.073) and Corynebacteriaceae (P = 0.074) when compared to PC. The PC increased (P < 0.05) occludin and tended to increase (P = 0.096) toll like-receptor-4 (TLR4) when compared to NC. The PC decreased (P < 0.05) average daily gain and average daily feed intake when compared to NC in d 7 to d 28. The PC increased FS (P < 0.05) compared to the HP and EP d 7 to d 11. The HP and EP decreased (P < 0.05) FS when compared to PC during d 7 to d 11 and d 7 to d 18. In conclusion, F18+ E. coli challenge disrupted the jejunal mucosa-associated microbiota, increased TLR4 expression and FS, consequently reduced GP. Both HP and EP phytobiotics supported intestinal morphology during the challenge to F18+ E. coli by supporting enterocyte maturation. The HP and EP treatments exhibited antimicrobial-like effects by altering the jejunal mucosa-associated microbiota and reduced FS during the first two weeks post-challenge. The HP treatment showed potential antioxidant effects.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Animal Science (JAS) is the premier journal for animal science and serves as the leading source of new knowledge and perspective in this area. JAS publishes more than 500 fully reviewed research articles, invited reviews, technical notes, and letters to the editor each year.
Articles published in JAS encompass a broad range of research topics in animal production and fundamental aspects of genetics, nutrition, physiology, and preparation and utilization of animal products. Articles typically report research with beef cattle, companion animals, goats, horses, pigs, and sheep; however, studies involving other farm animals, aquatic and wildlife species, and laboratory animal species that address fundamental questions related to livestock and companion animal biology will be considered for publication.