Use of Machine Learning to Assess the Management of Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infection.

IF 9.7 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL JAMA Network Open Pub Date : 2025-01-02 DOI:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.56950
Noah Jones, Ming-Chieh Shih, Elizabeth Healey, Chen Wen Zhai, Sonali Advani, Aaron Smith-McLallen, David Sontag, Sanjat Kanjilal
{"title":"Use of Machine Learning to Assess the Management of Uncomplicated Urinary Tract Infection.","authors":"Noah Jones, Ming-Chieh Shih, Elizabeth Healey, Chen Wen Zhai, Sonali Advani, Aaron Smith-McLallen, David Sontag, Sanjat Kanjilal","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.56950","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Uncomplicated urinary tract infection (UTI) is a common indication for outpatient antimicrobial therapy. National guidelines for the management of uncomplicated UTI were published in 2011, but the extent to which they align with current practices, patient diversity, and pathogen biology, all of which have evolved greatly in the time since their publication, is not fully known.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To reevaluate the effectiveness and adverse event profile for first-line antibiotics, fluoroquinolones, and oral β-lactams for treating uncomplicated UTI in contemporary clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This retrospective, population-based cohort study used a claims dataset from Independence Blue Cross, which contains inpatient, outpatient, laboratory, and pharmacy claims that occurred between 2012 and 2021, formatted into the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) common data model. Participants were nonpregnant female individuals aged 18 years or older with a diagnosis of uncomplicated, nonrecurrent UTI at an outpatient setting. Patients must also have been treated with first-line (nitrofurantoin or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole), fluoroquinolone (ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, or ofloxacin), or oral β-lactam (amoxicillin-clavulanate, cefadroxil, or cefpodoxime) antibiotics. Data analysis was performed from November 2021 to August 2024.</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>Patients exposed to first-line antibiotics were assigned to the treatment group, and those exposed to fluoroquinolone or β-lactam treatments were assigned to control groups.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary outcome was a composite end point for treatment failure, defined as outpatient or inpatient revisit within 30 days for UTI, pyelonephritis, or sepsis. Secondary outcomes were the risk of 4 common antibiotic-associated adverse events: gastrointestinal symptoms, rash, kidney injury, and Clostridium difficile infection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 57 585 episodes of UTI among 49 037 female patients (mean [SD] age, 51.7 [20.1]) years), with prescriptions for first-line antibiotics in 35 018 episodes (61%), fluoroquinolones in 21 140 episodes (37%), and β-lactams in 1427 episodes (2%). After adjustment, receipt of first-line therapies was associated with an absolute risk difference of -1.78% (95% CI, -2.37% to -1.06%) for having a revisit for UTI within 30 days of diagnosis vs fluoroquinolones. First-line therapies were associated with an absolute risk difference of -6.40% (95% CI, -10.14% to -3.24%) for 30-day revisit compared with β-lactam antibiotics. Differences in adverse events were similar between all comparators. Results were identical for models built with an automated OMOP feature extraction package.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this cohort study of patients with uncomplicated UTI derived from a large regional claims dataset, national treatment guidelines published almost 14 years ago continue to recommend optimal treatments. These results also provide proof-of-principle that automated feature extraction methods for OMOP formatted data can emulate manually curated models, thereby promoting reproducibility and generalizability.</p>","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"8 1","pages":"e2456950"},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11786233/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Network Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.56950","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Uncomplicated urinary tract infection (UTI) is a common indication for outpatient antimicrobial therapy. National guidelines for the management of uncomplicated UTI were published in 2011, but the extent to which they align with current practices, patient diversity, and pathogen biology, all of which have evolved greatly in the time since their publication, is not fully known.

Objective: To reevaluate the effectiveness and adverse event profile for first-line antibiotics, fluoroquinolones, and oral β-lactams for treating uncomplicated UTI in contemporary clinical practice.

Design, setting, and participants: This retrospective, population-based cohort study used a claims dataset from Independence Blue Cross, which contains inpatient, outpatient, laboratory, and pharmacy claims that occurred between 2012 and 2021, formatted into the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) common data model. Participants were nonpregnant female individuals aged 18 years or older with a diagnosis of uncomplicated, nonrecurrent UTI at an outpatient setting. Patients must also have been treated with first-line (nitrofurantoin or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole), fluoroquinolone (ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, or ofloxacin), or oral β-lactam (amoxicillin-clavulanate, cefadroxil, or cefpodoxime) antibiotics. Data analysis was performed from November 2021 to August 2024.

Exposures: Patients exposed to first-line antibiotics were assigned to the treatment group, and those exposed to fluoroquinolone or β-lactam treatments were assigned to control groups.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was a composite end point for treatment failure, defined as outpatient or inpatient revisit within 30 days for UTI, pyelonephritis, or sepsis. Secondary outcomes were the risk of 4 common antibiotic-associated adverse events: gastrointestinal symptoms, rash, kidney injury, and Clostridium difficile infection.

Results: There were 57 585 episodes of UTI among 49 037 female patients (mean [SD] age, 51.7 [20.1]) years), with prescriptions for first-line antibiotics in 35 018 episodes (61%), fluoroquinolones in 21 140 episodes (37%), and β-lactams in 1427 episodes (2%). After adjustment, receipt of first-line therapies was associated with an absolute risk difference of -1.78% (95% CI, -2.37% to -1.06%) for having a revisit for UTI within 30 days of diagnosis vs fluoroquinolones. First-line therapies were associated with an absolute risk difference of -6.40% (95% CI, -10.14% to -3.24%) for 30-day revisit compared with β-lactam antibiotics. Differences in adverse events were similar between all comparators. Results were identical for models built with an automated OMOP feature extraction package.

Conclusions and relevance: In this cohort study of patients with uncomplicated UTI derived from a large regional claims dataset, national treatment guidelines published almost 14 years ago continue to recommend optimal treatments. These results also provide proof-of-principle that automated feature extraction methods for OMOP formatted data can emulate manually curated models, thereby promoting reproducibility and generalizability.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用机器学习评估无并发症尿路感染的管理。
重要性:非并发症尿路感染(UTI)是门诊抗菌药物治疗的常见指征。2011年发布了管理非复杂性尿路感染的国家指南,但它们与当前实践、患者多样性和病原体生物学(自出版以来所有这些都发生了巨大变化)的一致程度尚不完全清楚。目的:重新评价一线抗生素、氟喹诺酮类药物和口服β-内酰胺类药物治疗非复杂性尿路感染的临床疗效和不良事件。设计、环境和参与者:这项回顾性的、基于人群的队列研究使用了独立蓝十字的索赔数据集,其中包含2012年至2021年间发生的住院、门诊、实验室和药房索赔,格式化为观察性医疗结果伙伴关系(OMOP)通用数据模型。参与者为未怀孕的女性个体,年龄在18岁或以上,在门诊诊断为无并发症,非复发性尿路感染。患者还必须接受一线(硝基呋喃妥因或甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑)、氟喹诺酮类(环丙沙星、左氧氟沙星或氧氟沙星)或口服β-内酰胺类(阿莫西林-克拉维酸酯、头孢羟肟或头孢多肟)抗生素治疗。数据分析时间为2021年11月至2024年8月。暴露:接受一线抗生素治疗的患者分为治疗组,接受氟喹诺酮或β-内酰胺治疗的患者分为对照组。主要结局和措施:主要结局是治疗失败的复合终点,定义为门诊或住院患者在30天内因尿路感染、肾盂肾炎或败血症而再次就诊。次要结局是4种常见抗生素相关不良事件的风险:胃肠道症状、皮疹、肾损伤和艰难梭菌感染。结果:49 037例女性患者(平均[SD]年龄51.7[20.1])发生57 585次UTI,其中一线抗生素35 018次(61%),氟喹诺酮类21 140次(37%),β-内酰胺类1427次(2%)。调整后,与氟喹诺酮类药物相比,接受一线治疗与诊断后30天内因尿路感染再次就诊的绝对风险差异为-1.78% (95% CI, -2.37%至-1.06%)。与β-内酰胺类抗生素相比,一线治疗与30天重访的绝对风险差异为-6.40% (95% CI, -10.14%至-3.24%)。所有比较者的不良事件差异相似。使用自动化OMOP特征提取包构建的模型结果相同。结论和相关性:在这项来自大型区域索赔数据集的非复杂性尿路感染患者的队列研究中,近14年前发布的国家治疗指南继续推荐最佳治疗方法。这些结果还提供了原理证明,即OMOP格式数据的自动特征提取方法可以模拟人工策划的模型,从而提高再现性和通用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JAMA Network Open
JAMA Network Open Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
2126
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: JAMA Network Open, a member of the esteemed JAMA Network, stands as an international, peer-reviewed, open-access general medical journal.The publication is dedicated to disseminating research across various health disciplines and countries, encompassing clinical care, innovation in health care, health policy, and global health. JAMA Network Open caters to clinicians, investigators, and policymakers, providing a platform for valuable insights and advancements in the medical field. As part of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications, JAMA Network Open contributes to the collective knowledge and understanding within the medical community.
期刊最新文献
Generative Artificial Intelligence Applications Use Among US Youth. Extraintestinal Invasive Escherichia coli Infections in the US. Costs of Single Maintenance and Reliever Therapy vs Traditional Therapy for Asthma. Maternal Health Workforce Expansion and Local Childbirths. Serous Ovarian Cancer Following Opportunistic Bilateral Salpingectomy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1