Difficult airway management in 25 hospitals across China: A multicenter cross-sectional study

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Journal of Clinical Anesthesia Pub Date : 2025-01-29 DOI:10.1016/j.jclinane.2025.111766
Zhi-hang Tang MD , Qi Chen MD , Wei Huang MD , Jia-nan Wang MD , Xiao-hua Zou PhD , Yang Xiao PhD , Xiao-tong Shi PhD , Hai-hong Deng PhD , Jing-jing Li PhD , Lun Wu PhD , Wen-zhi Liu PhD , Si-guang Hu PhD , Zheng-yang Zhou PhD , Heng-ning Qi PhD , Guo-hui Luan Phd , Wei Luo PhD , Yong Wang PhD , Wu-hua Ma Phd
{"title":"Difficult airway management in 25 hospitals across China: A multicenter cross-sectional study","authors":"Zhi-hang Tang MD ,&nbsp;Qi Chen MD ,&nbsp;Wei Huang MD ,&nbsp;Jia-nan Wang MD ,&nbsp;Xiao-hua Zou PhD ,&nbsp;Yang Xiao PhD ,&nbsp;Xiao-tong Shi PhD ,&nbsp;Hai-hong Deng PhD ,&nbsp;Jing-jing Li PhD ,&nbsp;Lun Wu PhD ,&nbsp;Wen-zhi Liu PhD ,&nbsp;Si-guang Hu PhD ,&nbsp;Zheng-yang Zhou PhD ,&nbsp;Heng-ning Qi PhD ,&nbsp;Guo-hui Luan Phd ,&nbsp;Wei Luo PhD ,&nbsp;Yong Wang PhD ,&nbsp;Wu-hua Ma Phd","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinane.2025.111766","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Study objective</h3><div>Difficult airway management is a significant challenge in clinical anesthesia, critical care, and emergency medicine. Inadequate management can lead to severe complications including organ damage and death. This study assessed the variability in difficult airway management across China and focused on how patient and operator factors influenced outcomes in operating rooms.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A multicenter observational cross-sectional study.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>This study was conducted from November 2022 to November 2023 and included 25 secondary and tertiary hospitals across various regions in China.</div></div><div><h3>Patients</h3><div>In the total of 181,399 general anesthesia patients, 384 (0.21 %) were identified as having difficult airways.</div></div><div><h3>Interventions</h3><div>Data were gathered from a specialized questionnaire comprising four sections with 27 questions and analyzed using logistic regression in SPSS to identify key factors that influenced effective management of difficult airways.</div></div><div><h3>Measurements</h3><div>This study focused on preoperative assessment, anesthesia selection, intubation attempts, and contingency planning for difficult airway management practices among anesthesiologists.</div></div><div><h3>Main results</h3><div>In anticipated difficult airways, rapid sequence induction was used in 51.7 % of the cases, maintaining spontaneous breathing under general anesthesia in 11.1 %, and awake intubation in 36 %. For unanticipated difficult airways, 95.9 % of the anesthesiologists opted for rapid sequence induction. Limited mouth opening was the most common cause of difficult airways and obesity and ankylosing spondylitis were identified as significant factors. The logistic regression analysis identified the type of difficult airway, anesthesiologist experience, and assessment methods as key factors influencing the first attempt intubation success.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The accuracy of difficult airway assessment and first attempt intubation success is influenced by both patient-related factors and the anesthesiologist's expertise. Regional and institutional variability in decision-making and tool selection underscores the critical need for standardized guidelines and comprehensive training to enhance airway management outcomes across diverse clinical settings in China.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15506,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","volume":"102 ","pages":"Article 111766"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0952818025000261","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study objective

Difficult airway management is a significant challenge in clinical anesthesia, critical care, and emergency medicine. Inadequate management can lead to severe complications including organ damage and death. This study assessed the variability in difficult airway management across China and focused on how patient and operator factors influenced outcomes in operating rooms.

Design

A multicenter observational cross-sectional study.

Setting

This study was conducted from November 2022 to November 2023 and included 25 secondary and tertiary hospitals across various regions in China.

Patients

In the total of 181,399 general anesthesia patients, 384 (0.21 %) were identified as having difficult airways.

Interventions

Data were gathered from a specialized questionnaire comprising four sections with 27 questions and analyzed using logistic regression in SPSS to identify key factors that influenced effective management of difficult airways.

Measurements

This study focused on preoperative assessment, anesthesia selection, intubation attempts, and contingency planning for difficult airway management practices among anesthesiologists.

Main results

In anticipated difficult airways, rapid sequence induction was used in 51.7 % of the cases, maintaining spontaneous breathing under general anesthesia in 11.1 %, and awake intubation in 36 %. For unanticipated difficult airways, 95.9 % of the anesthesiologists opted for rapid sequence induction. Limited mouth opening was the most common cause of difficult airways and obesity and ankylosing spondylitis were identified as significant factors. The logistic regression analysis identified the type of difficult airway, anesthesiologist experience, and assessment methods as key factors influencing the first attempt intubation success.

Conclusions

The accuracy of difficult airway assessment and first attempt intubation success is influenced by both patient-related factors and the anesthesiologist's expertise. Regional and institutional variability in decision-making and tool selection underscores the critical need for standardized guidelines and comprehensive training to enhance airway management outcomes across diverse clinical settings in China.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国25家医院气道管理困难:一项多中心横断面研究
研究目的:气道管理困难是临床麻醉、重症监护和急诊医学面临的重大挑战。管理不当可导致严重并发症,包括器官损伤和死亡。本研究评估了中国困难气道管理的可变性,并重点关注患者和操作人员因素如何影响手术室的结果。设计:多中心横断面观察性研究。研究时间为2022年11月至2023年11月,研究对象为中国各地区的25家二、三级医院。患者:在181,399例全麻患者中,384例(0.21%)被确定为气道困难。干预措施:数据收集自一份专门的问卷,包括四部分27个问题,并使用SPSS中的逻辑回归分析,以确定影响有效管理困难气道的关键因素。测量:本研究的重点是术前评估,麻醉选择,插管尝试,以及在麻醉医师中困难气道管理实践的应急计划。主要结果:在预期气道困难的病例中,51.7%的病例采用快速序贯诱导,11.1%的病例采用全麻下维持自主呼吸,36%的病例采用清醒插管。对于未预料到的气道困难,95.9%的麻醉医师选择快速序列诱导。张嘴受限是气道困难的最常见原因,肥胖和强直性脊柱炎被认为是重要因素。logistic回归分析发现困难气道类型、麻醉医师经验和评估方法是影响首次插管成功的关键因素。结论:气道困难评估的准确性和首次插管成功率受患者相关因素和麻醉医师专业知识的影响。决策和工具选择的地区和机构差异强调了标准化指南和综合培训的迫切需要,以提高中国不同临床环境下气道管理的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.50%
发文量
346
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Anesthesia (JCA) addresses all aspects of anesthesia practice, including anesthetic administration, pharmacokinetics, preoperative and postoperative considerations, coexisting disease and other complicating factors, cost issues, and similar concerns anesthesiologists contend with daily. Exceptionally high standards of presentation and accuracy are maintained. The core of the journal is original contributions on subjects relevant to clinical practice, and rigorously peer-reviewed. Highly respected international experts have joined together to form the Editorial Board, sharing their years of experience and clinical expertise. Specialized section editors cover the various subspecialties within the field. To keep your practical clinical skills current, the journal bridges the gap between the laboratory and the clinical practice of anesthesiology and critical care to clarify how new insights can improve daily practice.
期刊最新文献
Incidence of phosphate abnormalities after cardiac surgery and their association with lactic acidosis: A cohort study from the Multicenter Perioperative Outcomes Group. Safety and efficacy of Suzetrigine (VX-548) for acute moderate to severe pain in adults; a systematic review and meta-analysis. Association of target-controlled versus manually controlled infusion with postoperative recovery outcomes in elderly cardiac surgery patients: an international multi-cohort study. Will AI keep you out of trouble? An expert panel review of LLMs for hazardous regional anesthesia consults. Effect of recruitment maneuver strategy on early postoperative atelectasis among intermediate- to high-risk patients undergoing abdominal surgery: A multicenter, 2 × 2 factorial, randomized clinical trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1