Effects of blood flow restriction on internal and external training load metrics during acute and chronic short-term repeated-sprint training in team-sport athletes.
James R Mckee, Kristen De Marco, Olivier Girard, Jeremiah J Peiffer, Brendan R Scott
{"title":"Effects of blood flow restriction on internal and external training load metrics during acute and chronic short-term repeated-sprint training in team-sport athletes.","authors":"James R Mckee, Kristen De Marco, Olivier Girard, Jeremiah J Peiffer, Brendan R Scott","doi":"10.1080/02640414.2025.2457863","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examined internal, external training loads, internal:external ratios, and aerobic adaptations for acute and short-term chronic repeated-sprint training (RST) with blood flow restriction (BFR). Using randomised crossover (Experiment A) and between-subject (Experiment B) designs, 15 and 24 semi-professional Australian footballers completed two and nine RST sessions, respectively. Sessions comprised three sets of 5-7 × 5-second sprints and 25 seconds recovery, with continuous BFR (45% arterial occlusion pressure) or without (Non-BFR). Banister's, Edwards', Lucia's training impulse, and session rating of perceived exertion training load (sRPE<sub>TL</sub>) were calculated. External training loads were determined by total work done (TWD). Ventilatory threshold power outputs were assessed during a graded exercise test post-RST. Internal training loads were comparable between conditions, though BFR reduced (<i>p</i> < 0.02) TWD during acute (-4.9%) and short-term chronic (-10.0%) RST compared to Non-BFR. Furthermore, BFR increased (<i>p</i> = 0.049) the sRPE<sub>TL</sub>:TWD ratio during short-term chronic (+14.8%), but not acute RST. First and second ventilatory threshold power outputs improved (+8.3% and + 4.2%, respectively) similarly for both groups following RST. Repeated exposure to progressively overloaded RST with BFR increases internal demands for a given workload, which may promote beneficial physiological adaptations compared to Non-BFR, though aerobic performance was not further enhanced.</p>","PeriodicalId":17066,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sports Sciences","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sports Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2025.2457863","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study examined internal, external training loads, internal:external ratios, and aerobic adaptations for acute and short-term chronic repeated-sprint training (RST) with blood flow restriction (BFR). Using randomised crossover (Experiment A) and between-subject (Experiment B) designs, 15 and 24 semi-professional Australian footballers completed two and nine RST sessions, respectively. Sessions comprised three sets of 5-7 × 5-second sprints and 25 seconds recovery, with continuous BFR (45% arterial occlusion pressure) or without (Non-BFR). Banister's, Edwards', Lucia's training impulse, and session rating of perceived exertion training load (sRPETL) were calculated. External training loads were determined by total work done (TWD). Ventilatory threshold power outputs were assessed during a graded exercise test post-RST. Internal training loads were comparable between conditions, though BFR reduced (p < 0.02) TWD during acute (-4.9%) and short-term chronic (-10.0%) RST compared to Non-BFR. Furthermore, BFR increased (p = 0.049) the sRPETL:TWD ratio during short-term chronic (+14.8%), but not acute RST. First and second ventilatory threshold power outputs improved (+8.3% and + 4.2%, respectively) similarly for both groups following RST. Repeated exposure to progressively overloaded RST with BFR increases internal demands for a given workload, which may promote beneficial physiological adaptations compared to Non-BFR, though aerobic performance was not further enhanced.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Sports Sciences has an international reputation for publishing articles of a high standard and is both Medline and Clarivate Analytics-listed. It publishes research on various aspects of the sports and exercise sciences, including anatomy, biochemistry, biomechanics, performance analysis, physiology, psychology, sports medicine and health, as well as coaching and talent identification, kinanthropometry and other interdisciplinary perspectives.
The emphasis of the Journal is on the human sciences, broadly defined and applied to sport and exercise. Besides experimental work in human responses to exercise, the subjects covered will include human responses to technologies such as the design of sports equipment and playing facilities, research in training, selection, performance prediction or modification, and stress reduction or manifestation. Manuscripts considered for publication include those dealing with original investigations of exercise, validation of technological innovations in sport or comprehensive reviews of topics relevant to the scientific study of sport.