Jessica M. Ruck MD, PhD, Maria A. Parra MD, Matthew D. Price MD, MPH, Caitlin W. Hicks MD, MS, Elizabeth A. King MD, PhD
{"title":"Delirium Among Liver Transplant Recipients: A National Analysis Using MarketScan","authors":"Jessica M. Ruck MD, PhD, Maria A. Parra MD, Matthew D. Price MD, MPH, Caitlin W. Hicks MD, MS, Elizabeth A. King MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2024.12.035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Delirium is a common issue following liver transplantation (LT), but research has mainly focused on single-center cohorts.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We studied delirium in a national cohort of adult LT recipients transplanted October, 2015-December, 2020 using the MarketScan database. Claims data were used to identify LT recipients with delirium. Characteristics and outcomes of LT recipients with and without delirium were compared using descriptive statistics.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 2051 LT recipients, only 32 (1.6%) had a delirium claim. Recipients with <em>versus</em> without delirium were more likely to have a history of encephalopathy (21.9% <em>versus</em> 8.2%, <em>P</em> = 0.006) but were of similar age and sex. Recipients with <em>versus</em> without delirium were more likely to be discharged to skilled care or rehabilitation facilities (37.5% <em>versus</em> 14.3%, <em>P</em> = 0.003) and had longer median hospital stays (24 <em>versus</em> 14 ds, <em>P</em> = 0.03). Delirium claims were not associated with median hospitalization costs (<em>P</em> = 0.15) or 30-d (<em>P</em> = 0.32) and 60-d (<em>P</em> = 0.99) readmission.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Overall, only 1.6% of adult LT recipients had delirium claims, despite prevalence estimates of up to 47% in single-center studies. This underreporting—which is likely limited to the most severe cases—limits our ability to assess associated outcomes and highlights the need for better delirium recognition and reporting.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Research","volume":"306 ","pages":"Pages 510-515"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022480424008321","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Delirium is a common issue following liver transplantation (LT), but research has mainly focused on single-center cohorts.
Methods
We studied delirium in a national cohort of adult LT recipients transplanted October, 2015-December, 2020 using the MarketScan database. Claims data were used to identify LT recipients with delirium. Characteristics and outcomes of LT recipients with and without delirium were compared using descriptive statistics.
Results
Among 2051 LT recipients, only 32 (1.6%) had a delirium claim. Recipients with versus without delirium were more likely to have a history of encephalopathy (21.9% versus 8.2%, P = 0.006) but were of similar age and sex. Recipients with versus without delirium were more likely to be discharged to skilled care or rehabilitation facilities (37.5% versus 14.3%, P = 0.003) and had longer median hospital stays (24 versus 14 ds, P = 0.03). Delirium claims were not associated with median hospitalization costs (P = 0.15) or 30-d (P = 0.32) and 60-d (P = 0.99) readmission.
Conclusions
Overall, only 1.6% of adult LT recipients had delirium claims, despite prevalence estimates of up to 47% in single-center studies. This underreporting—which is likely limited to the most severe cases—limits our ability to assess associated outcomes and highlights the need for better delirium recognition and reporting.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Surgical Research: Clinical and Laboratory Investigation publishes original articles concerned with clinical and laboratory investigations relevant to surgical practice and teaching. The journal emphasizes reports of clinical investigations or fundamental research bearing directly on surgical management that will be of general interest to a broad range of surgeons and surgical researchers. The articles presented need not have been the products of surgeons or of surgical laboratories.
The Journal of Surgical Research also features review articles and special articles relating to educational, research, or social issues of interest to the academic surgical community.