Delirium Among Liver Transplant Recipients: A National Analysis Using MarketScan

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY Journal of Surgical Research Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-28 DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2024.12.035
Jessica M. Ruck MD, PhD, Maria A. Parra MD, Matthew D. Price MD, MPH, Caitlin W. Hicks MD, MS, Elizabeth A. King MD, PhD
{"title":"Delirium Among Liver Transplant Recipients: A National Analysis Using MarketScan","authors":"Jessica M. Ruck MD, PhD,&nbsp;Maria A. Parra MD,&nbsp;Matthew D. Price MD, MPH,&nbsp;Caitlin W. Hicks MD, MS,&nbsp;Elizabeth A. King MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jss.2024.12.035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Delirium is a common issue following liver transplantation (LT), but research has mainly focused on single-center cohorts.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We studied delirium in a national cohort of adult LT recipients transplanted October, 2015-December, 2020 using the MarketScan database. Claims data were used to identify LT recipients with delirium. Characteristics and outcomes of LT recipients with and without delirium were compared using descriptive statistics.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 2051 LT recipients, only 32 (1.6%) had a delirium claim. Recipients with <em>versus</em> without delirium were more likely to have a history of encephalopathy (21.9% <em>versus</em> 8.2%, <em>P</em> = 0.006) but were of similar age and sex. Recipients with <em>versus</em> without delirium were more likely to be discharged to skilled care or rehabilitation facilities (37.5% <em>versus</em> 14.3%, <em>P</em> = 0.003) and had longer median hospital stays (24 <em>versus</em> 14 ds, <em>P</em> = 0.03). Delirium claims were not associated with median hospitalization costs (<em>P</em> = 0.15) or 30-d (<em>P</em> = 0.32) and 60-d (<em>P</em> = 0.99) readmission.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Overall, only 1.6% of adult LT recipients had delirium claims, despite prevalence estimates of up to 47% in single-center studies. This underreporting—which is likely limited to the most severe cases—limits our ability to assess associated outcomes and highlights the need for better delirium recognition and reporting.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17030,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Research","volume":"306 ","pages":"Pages 510-515"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022480424008321","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Delirium is a common issue following liver transplantation (LT), but research has mainly focused on single-center cohorts.

Methods

We studied delirium in a national cohort of adult LT recipients transplanted October, 2015-December, 2020 using the MarketScan database. Claims data were used to identify LT recipients with delirium. Characteristics and outcomes of LT recipients with and without delirium were compared using descriptive statistics.

Results

Among 2051 LT recipients, only 32 (1.6%) had a delirium claim. Recipients with versus without delirium were more likely to have a history of encephalopathy (21.9% versus 8.2%, P = 0.006) but were of similar age and sex. Recipients with versus without delirium were more likely to be discharged to skilled care or rehabilitation facilities (37.5% versus 14.3%, P = 0.003) and had longer median hospital stays (24 versus 14 ds, P = 0.03). Delirium claims were not associated with median hospitalization costs (P = 0.15) or 30-d (P = 0.32) and 60-d (P = 0.99) readmission.

Conclusions

Overall, only 1.6% of adult LT recipients had delirium claims, despite prevalence estimates of up to 47% in single-center studies. This underreporting—which is likely limited to the most severe cases—limits our ability to assess associated outcomes and highlights the need for better delirium recognition and reporting.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肝移植受者的谵妄:一项使用市场扫描的全国分析。
谵妄是肝移植(LT)后的常见问题,但研究主要集中在单中心队列。方法:我们使用MarketScan数据库研究2015年10月- 2020年12月移植的全国成人肝移植受体队列中的谵妄。索赔数据用于识别谵妄的LT接受者。采用描述性统计方法对伴有和不伴有谵妄的LT受体的特征和结果进行比较。结果:在2051名LT接受者中,只有32名(1.6%)有谵妄声称。有谵妄的患者比没有谵妄的患者更有可能有脑病史(21.9%比8.2%,P = 0.006),但年龄和性别相似。有谵妄的患者比没有谵妄的患者更有可能出院到专业护理机构或康复机构(37.5%比14.3%,P = 0.003),中位住院时间更长(24比14天,P = 0.03)。谵妄索赔与住院费用中位数(P = 0.15)或30天(P = 0.32)和60天(P = 0.99)再入院无关。结论:总体而言,尽管在单中心研究中患病率估计高达47%,但只有1.6%的成人肝移植接受者声称患有谵妄。这种低报——可能仅限于最严重的病例——限制了我们评估相关结果的能力,并突出了更好的谵妄识别和报告的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
627
审稿时长
138 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Research: Clinical and Laboratory Investigation publishes original articles concerned with clinical and laboratory investigations relevant to surgical practice and teaching. The journal emphasizes reports of clinical investigations or fundamental research bearing directly on surgical management that will be of general interest to a broad range of surgeons and surgical researchers. The articles presented need not have been the products of surgeons or of surgical laboratories. The Journal of Surgical Research also features review articles and special articles relating to educational, research, or social issues of interest to the academic surgical community.
期刊最新文献
The Optimal Timing of Portal and Hepatic Vein Ligation for Increasing Liver Remnant Volume in Rats Timing of Tracheostomy in Critically Ill Geriatric Trauma Patients: A Nationwide Analysis Ten Year Review of Wound Culture Results and Antimicrobial Resistance Patterns in a Burn Center Effect of TU-100 on Colorectal Liver Metastasis in Mouse Model of MASH Strengthening Vascular Surgery Training in Sub-Saharan Africa: 1-Year Kenyan Experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1