Impact of hospital formulary intervention on carbapenem use: a segmented time-series analysis of consumption and a propensity score-matched non-inferiority study of treatment efficacy.

IF 1.2 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences Pub Date : 2025-01-29 DOI:10.1186/s40780-025-00409-6
Nakaba Okamura, Ayano Katagiri, Tomoya Komori, Kei Kawanabe, Hirofumi Koike, Yukiko Sahashi, Rie Kubota
{"title":"Impact of hospital formulary intervention on carbapenem use: a segmented time-series analysis of consumption and a propensity score-matched non-inferiority study of treatment efficacy.","authors":"Nakaba Okamura, Ayano Katagiri, Tomoya Komori, Kei Kawanabe, Hirofumi Koike, Yukiko Sahashi, Rie Kubota","doi":"10.1186/s40780-025-00409-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Pharmaceutical formularies play a crucial role in guiding medication use by balancing clinical effectiveness and cost efficiency. Although formulary implementation has been increasing in Japan, comprehensive evaluations of its impact on both clinical and economic outcomes are limited. This study aimed to assess the effect of introducing an antimicrobial formulary at Yokohama City University Hospital on antibiotic usage and treatment outcomes in intra-abdominal infections.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a segmented time-series analysis to evaluate changes in carbapenem usage, including doripenem, before and after formulary implementation in October 2018. Monthly antibiotic consumption was measured by antibiotic use density (AUD). The primary outcomes were changes in doripenem use and treatment efficacy for intra-abdominal infections. To assess treatment efficacy, we used non-inferiority analysis with propensity score matching based on age, sex, body mass index, cancer status, and baseline blood test results. The treatment outcomes were evaluated using predefined clinical indicators.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following the formulary intervention, doripenem use significantly decreased from 10.8 to 4.9%, meropenem use slightly increased, and imipenem/cilastatin usage remained stable. Overall, carbapenem use significantly decreased during the study period. Treatment effectiveness for intra-abdominal infections remained non-inferior, with a higher proportion of patients classified as having an \"effective\" response post-intervention (86.6% vs. 79.4% pre-intervention). The confidence interval confirmed the non-inferiority margin, indicating no clinically significant reduction in treatment effectiveness following the formulary introduction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The introduction of an antibiotic formulary at Yokohama City University Hospital effectively reduced the use of doripenem without compromising the effectiveness of treatment of intra-abdominal infections. These findings suggest that formulary management can be a valuable strategy for optimizing antibiotic use while maintaining clinical outcomes and contributing to improved antimicrobial stewardship in healthcare settings. Further research is warranted to explore the broader implications of formulary implementation in Japanese healthcare practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":16730,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences","volume":"11 1","pages":"7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11776234/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40780-025-00409-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Pharmaceutical formularies play a crucial role in guiding medication use by balancing clinical effectiveness and cost efficiency. Although formulary implementation has been increasing in Japan, comprehensive evaluations of its impact on both clinical and economic outcomes are limited. This study aimed to assess the effect of introducing an antimicrobial formulary at Yokohama City University Hospital on antibiotic usage and treatment outcomes in intra-abdominal infections.

Methods: We conducted a segmented time-series analysis to evaluate changes in carbapenem usage, including doripenem, before and after formulary implementation in October 2018. Monthly antibiotic consumption was measured by antibiotic use density (AUD). The primary outcomes were changes in doripenem use and treatment efficacy for intra-abdominal infections. To assess treatment efficacy, we used non-inferiority analysis with propensity score matching based on age, sex, body mass index, cancer status, and baseline blood test results. The treatment outcomes were evaluated using predefined clinical indicators.

Results: Following the formulary intervention, doripenem use significantly decreased from 10.8 to 4.9%, meropenem use slightly increased, and imipenem/cilastatin usage remained stable. Overall, carbapenem use significantly decreased during the study period. Treatment effectiveness for intra-abdominal infections remained non-inferior, with a higher proportion of patients classified as having an "effective" response post-intervention (86.6% vs. 79.4% pre-intervention). The confidence interval confirmed the non-inferiority margin, indicating no clinically significant reduction in treatment effectiveness following the formulary introduction.

Conclusions: The introduction of an antibiotic formulary at Yokohama City University Hospital effectively reduced the use of doripenem without compromising the effectiveness of treatment of intra-abdominal infections. These findings suggest that formulary management can be a valuable strategy for optimizing antibiotic use while maintaining clinical outcomes and contributing to improved antimicrobial stewardship in healthcare settings. Further research is warranted to explore the broader implications of formulary implementation in Japanese healthcare practices.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医院处方干预对碳青霉烯使用的影响:消费的分段时间序列分析和治疗效果的倾向评分匹配的非劣效性研究
背景:药物处方通过平衡临床疗效和成本效益,在指导用药方面发挥着至关重要的作用。虽然日本的处方实施一直在增加,但对其对临床和经济结果的影响的综合评估有限。本研究旨在评估在横滨市立大学医院引入抗菌处方对腹腔内感染抗生素使用和治疗结果的影响。方法:采用分段时间序列分析方法,评估2018年10月实施处方前后碳青霉烯类药物(包括多利培南)使用情况的变化。每月抗生素用量以抗生素使用密度(AUD)计算。主要结局是多利培南的使用变化和腹腔内感染的治疗效果。为了评估治疗效果,我们采用了基于年龄、性别、体重指数、癌症状况和基线血液检查结果的倾向评分匹配的非劣效性分析。使用预先设定的临床指标评估治疗结果。结果:处方干预后,多利培南使用率由10.8%显著下降至4.9%,美罗培南使用率略有上升,亚胺培南/西司他汀使用率保持稳定。总体而言,碳青霉烯的使用在研究期间显著减少。腹腔内感染的治疗效果仍然不差,干预后被归类为“有效”反应的患者比例更高(86.6%对79.4%)。置信区间证实了非劣效性边际,表明引入处方后治疗效果没有临床显著降低。结论:横滨市立大学医院抗生素处方的引入有效地减少了多利培南的使用,而不影响治疗腹腔内感染的有效性。这些发现表明,处方管理可以是优化抗生素使用的一种有价值的策略,同时保持临床结果,并有助于改善卫生保健环境中的抗菌药物管理。进一步的研究是必要的,以探索处方实施在日本医疗保健实践的更广泛的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Comparison of an HPLC-UV system (LM1010) and UPLC-MS/MS for plasma voriconazole measurement in routine clinical practice. A comparative study of the effectiveness of virtual reality-based and text-based training in sterile preparation: pilot trial of early-stage clinical VR study. Factors associated with peripheral neuropathy development during gemcitabine plus albumin-bound paclitaxel therapy as first-line treatment for unresectable pancreatic cancer: a retrospective evaluation. Incidence and clinical characteristics of zolbetuximab-induced nausea and vomiting in CLDN18.2-positive unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric cancer: a retrospective study. Changes in prescription patterns and drug costs following the launch of generic pemetrexed products: a retrospective study in Japan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1