Lisa Carnago, Kristin Holbrook, David Leverenz, Allison Dimsdale
{"title":"A model of care redesign within rheumatology: A mixed methods approach integrating nurse practitioners and physician assistants.","authors":"Lisa Carnago, Kristin Holbrook, David Leverenz, Allison Dimsdale","doi":"10.1097/JXX.0000000000001112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Increasing patient demand and clinician burnout in rheumatology practices have highlighted the need for more efficient models of care (MOC). Interprofessional collaboration is essential for improving patient outcomes and clinician satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Local problem: </strong>Our current MOC lacks standardization and formal integration of Nurse Practitioners (NPs) and Physician Assistants (PAs), resulting in reduced clinician satisfaction and limited patient access. To optimize care quality, clinician satisfaction, and patient access, we sought to develop an interprofessional MOC tailored to an academic rheumatology practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a mixed methods sequential-exploratory design within a quality improvement (QI) framework to create a blueprint for MOC redesign.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Intervention development proceeded in four phases: needs assessment, data collection, socializing key ideas, and team design and planning.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the needs assessment phase, divisional leadership was interviewed to identify shared goals for an optimized MOC. Data collection included surveys distributed to 12 physicians and 8 NPs/PAs, addressing 11 key domains related to current and future MOC needs. In phase 3, we communicated key findings to divisional leadership, clinicians, and staff. Phase 4 involved iterative team building and MOC design. Survey results revealed low satisfaction with the current MOC and a strong preference for parallel practice, standardization, and formal NP/Physician Assistant integration. Several barriers to MOC implementation were also identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Redesigning the MOC in rheumatology requires aligning clinician, leadership, and organizational priorities. A mixed methods QI approach effectively uncovers clinical needs and potential barriers, supporting the successful implementation of a new MOC.</p>","PeriodicalId":17179,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JXX.0000000000001112","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Increasing patient demand and clinician burnout in rheumatology practices have highlighted the need for more efficient models of care (MOC). Interprofessional collaboration is essential for improving patient outcomes and clinician satisfaction.
Local problem: Our current MOC lacks standardization and formal integration of Nurse Practitioners (NPs) and Physician Assistants (PAs), resulting in reduced clinician satisfaction and limited patient access. To optimize care quality, clinician satisfaction, and patient access, we sought to develop an interprofessional MOC tailored to an academic rheumatology practice.
Methods: We used a mixed methods sequential-exploratory design within a quality improvement (QI) framework to create a blueprint for MOC redesign.
Intervention: Intervention development proceeded in four phases: needs assessment, data collection, socializing key ideas, and team design and planning.
Results: In the needs assessment phase, divisional leadership was interviewed to identify shared goals for an optimized MOC. Data collection included surveys distributed to 12 physicians and 8 NPs/PAs, addressing 11 key domains related to current and future MOC needs. In phase 3, we communicated key findings to divisional leadership, clinicians, and staff. Phase 4 involved iterative team building and MOC design. Survey results revealed low satisfaction with the current MOC and a strong preference for parallel practice, standardization, and formal NP/Physician Assistant integration. Several barriers to MOC implementation were also identified.
Conclusion: Redesigning the MOC in rheumatology requires aligning clinician, leadership, and organizational priorities. A mixed methods QI approach effectively uncovers clinical needs and potential barriers, supporting the successful implementation of a new MOC.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners (JAANP) is a monthly peer-reviewed professional journal that serves as the official publication of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners.
Published since 1989, the JAANP provides a strong clinical focus with articles related to primary, secondary, and tertiary care, nurse practitioner education, health policy, ethics and ethical issues, and health care delivery. The journal publishes original research, integrative/comprehensive reviews, case studies, a variety of topics in clinical practice, and theory-based articles related to patient and professional education. Although the majority of nurse practitioners function in primary care, there is an increasing focus on the provision of care across all types of systems from acute to long-term care settings.