A model of care redesign within rheumatology: A mixed methods approach integrating nurse practitioners and physician assistants.

Lisa Carnago, Kristin Holbrook, David Leverenz, Allison Dimsdale
{"title":"A model of care redesign within rheumatology: A mixed methods approach integrating nurse practitioners and physician assistants.","authors":"Lisa Carnago, Kristin Holbrook, David Leverenz, Allison Dimsdale","doi":"10.1097/JXX.0000000000001112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Increasing patient demand and clinician burnout in rheumatology practices have highlighted the need for more efficient models of care (MOC). Interprofessional collaboration is essential for improving patient outcomes and clinician satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Local problem: </strong>Our current MOC lacks standardization and formal integration of Nurse Practitioners (NPs) and Physician Assistants (PAs), resulting in reduced clinician satisfaction and limited patient access. To optimize care quality, clinician satisfaction, and patient access, we sought to develop an interprofessional MOC tailored to an academic rheumatology practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a mixed methods sequential-exploratory design within a quality improvement (QI) framework to create a blueprint for MOC redesign.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Intervention development proceeded in four phases: needs assessment, data collection, socializing key ideas, and team design and planning.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the needs assessment phase, divisional leadership was interviewed to identify shared goals for an optimized MOC. Data collection included surveys distributed to 12 physicians and 8 NPs/PAs, addressing 11 key domains related to current and future MOC needs. In phase 3, we communicated key findings to divisional leadership, clinicians, and staff. Phase 4 involved iterative team building and MOC design. Survey results revealed low satisfaction with the current MOC and a strong preference for parallel practice, standardization, and formal NP/Physician Assistant integration. Several barriers to MOC implementation were also identified.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Redesigning the MOC in rheumatology requires aligning clinician, leadership, and organizational priorities. A mixed methods QI approach effectively uncovers clinical needs and potential barriers, supporting the successful implementation of a new MOC.</p>","PeriodicalId":17179,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners","volume":" ","pages":"239-247"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JXX.0000000000001112","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Increasing patient demand and clinician burnout in rheumatology practices have highlighted the need for more efficient models of care (MOC). Interprofessional collaboration is essential for improving patient outcomes and clinician satisfaction.

Local problem: Our current MOC lacks standardization and formal integration of Nurse Practitioners (NPs) and Physician Assistants (PAs), resulting in reduced clinician satisfaction and limited patient access. To optimize care quality, clinician satisfaction, and patient access, we sought to develop an interprofessional MOC tailored to an academic rheumatology practice.

Methods: We used a mixed methods sequential-exploratory design within a quality improvement (QI) framework to create a blueprint for MOC redesign.

Intervention: Intervention development proceeded in four phases: needs assessment, data collection, socializing key ideas, and team design and planning.

Results: In the needs assessment phase, divisional leadership was interviewed to identify shared goals for an optimized MOC. Data collection included surveys distributed to 12 physicians and 8 NPs/PAs, addressing 11 key domains related to current and future MOC needs. In phase 3, we communicated key findings to divisional leadership, clinicians, and staff. Phase 4 involved iterative team building and MOC design. Survey results revealed low satisfaction with the current MOC and a strong preference for parallel practice, standardization, and formal NP/Physician Assistant integration. Several barriers to MOC implementation were also identified.

Conclusion: Redesigning the MOC in rheumatology requires aligning clinician, leadership, and organizational priorities. A mixed methods QI approach effectively uncovers clinical needs and potential barriers, supporting the successful implementation of a new MOC.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
风湿病学中护理重新设计的模型:综合执业护士和医师助理的混合方法。
背景:风湿病实践中患者需求的增加和临床医生的倦怠突出了对更有效的护理模式(MOC)的需求。跨专业合作对于改善患者预后和临床医生满意度至关重要。本地问题:我国目前的MOC缺乏标准化和执业护士(NPs)和医师助理(PAs)的正式整合,导致临床医生满意度降低,患者就诊受限。为了优化护理质量、临床医生满意度和患者可及性,我们寻求开发适合风湿病学学术实践的跨专业MOC。方法:我们在质量改进(QI)框架内采用混合方法顺序探索性设计来创建MOC重新设计的蓝图。干预:干预发展分为四个阶段:需求评估、数据收集、关键思想社会化、团队设计与规划。结果:在需求评估阶段,对部门领导进行了访谈,以确定优化MOC的共同目标。数据收集包括对12名医生和8名NPs/ pa的调查,涉及与当前和未来MOC需求相关的11个关键领域。在第三阶段,我们向部门领导、临床医生和员工传达了关键发现。第4阶段涉及迭代团队建设和MOC设计。调查结果显示,对当前MOC的满意度较低,强烈倾向于平行实践、标准化和正式的NP/医师助理整合。还确定了实施MOC的几个障碍。结论:重新设计风湿病MOC需要调整临床医生、领导和组织的优先级。混合方法QI方法有效地揭示了临床需求和潜在障碍,支持成功实施新的MOC。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
16.70%
发文量
172
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners (JAANP) is a monthly peer-reviewed professional journal that serves as the official publication of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners. Published since 1989, the JAANP provides a strong clinical focus with articles related to primary, secondary, and tertiary care, nurse practitioner education, health policy, ethics and ethical issues, and health care delivery. The journal publishes original research, integrative/comprehensive reviews, case studies, a variety of topics in clinical practice, and theory-based articles related to patient and professional education. Although the majority of nurse practitioners function in primary care, there is an increasing focus on the provision of care across all types of systems from acute to long-term care settings.
期刊最新文献
A comparison of the knowledge and practices of cervical cancer prevention between United States and international female college students. The impact of nurse practitioner state practice regulation on health and health outcomes: An integrative review. Investigating and supporting wellness of advanced practice nurses and physician associates: Associated challenges before, during, and after the Covid-19 pandemic. Impact of early primary care follow-up on hospital readmissions: An integrative review. Impact of direct patient care clinical hours on national nurse practitioner certification pass rates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1