A megastudy of lexico-semantic effects in single-word shadowing.

IF 1.4 3区 心理学 Q4 PHYSIOLOGY Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Pub Date : 2025-11-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-27 DOI:10.1177/17470218251320371
Zongyu Qian, Winston D Goh
{"title":"A megastudy of lexico-semantic effects in single-word shadowing.","authors":"Zongyu Qian, Winston D Goh","doi":"10.1177/17470218251320371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lexico-semantic effects in lexical decision and semantic categorisation tasks have been investigated using the megastudy approach, but not with other traditional spoken word recognition tasks. To address this gap, this megastudy examined the single-word shadowing task, where 96 native English speakers repeated aloud each word they heard as quickly and as accurately as possible. Item-level hierarchical regression and linear mixed-effects analyses produced identical results: Words with longer token duration were associated with slower response times while high-frequency and phonologically distinctive words were repeated faster. These findings were consistent with previous studies and other tasks, which suggests that lexical effects are task-general in spoken word recognition. However, after controlling for lexical variables, six semantic variables did not account for any additional unique variance in response times. These results suggest that the single-word shadowing task is heavily dependent on lexical processing and can be completed without activating semantics. Cross-task comparisons with another megastudy's data on auditory lexical decision and semantic categorisation tasks further suggest that lexical effects are task-general, while semantic richness effects are task-specific in spoken word recognition.</p>","PeriodicalId":20869,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"2557-2569"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12531404/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218251320371","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lexico-semantic effects in lexical decision and semantic categorisation tasks have been investigated using the megastudy approach, but not with other traditional spoken word recognition tasks. To address this gap, this megastudy examined the single-word shadowing task, where 96 native English speakers repeated aloud each word they heard as quickly and as accurately as possible. Item-level hierarchical regression and linear mixed-effects analyses produced identical results: Words with longer token duration were associated with slower response times while high-frequency and phonologically distinctive words were repeated faster. These findings were consistent with previous studies and other tasks, which suggests that lexical effects are task-general in spoken word recognition. However, after controlling for lexical variables, six semantic variables did not account for any additional unique variance in response times. These results suggest that the single-word shadowing task is heavily dependent on lexical processing and can be completed without activating semantics. Cross-task comparisons with another megastudy's data on auditory lexical decision and semantic categorisation tasks further suggest that lexical effects are task-general, while semantic richness effects are task-specific in spoken word recognition.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
EXPRESS:单字阴影中词汇语义效应的大研究。
词汇决策和语义分类任务中的词汇语义效应已经用大研究方法进行了研究,但在其他传统的口语单词识别任务中还没有研究。为了解决这一差距,目前的大型研究使用了麦克雷等人(2005)规范中的单词,检查了单个单词的阴影任务,其中96名母语为英语的人尽可能快速准确地大声重复他们听到的每个单词。项目水平的层次回归和线性混合效应分析得出了相同的结果:标记持续时间较长的单词与较慢的反应时间相关,而高频和语音上独特的单词被重复得更快。这些发现与之前的研究和其他任务一致,这表明词汇效应在口语单词识别中是普遍存在的。然而,在控制词法变量之后,六个语义变量并不能解释响应时间中任何额外的唯一方差。这些结果表明,单字阴影任务严重依赖词汇处理,可以在不激活语义的情况下完成。与Goh等人(2016)的听觉词汇决策和语义分类任务大研究数据的跨任务比较进一步表明,口语单词识别中的词汇效应是任务一般效应,而语义丰富度效应是任务特定效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
178
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Promoting the interests of scientific psychology and its researchers, QJEP, the journal of the Experimental Psychology Society, is a leading journal with a long-standing tradition of publishing cutting-edge research. Several articles have become classic papers in the fields of attention, perception, learning, memory, language, and reasoning. The journal publishes original articles on any topic within the field of experimental psychology (including comparative research). These include substantial experimental reports, review papers, rapid communications (reporting novel techniques or ground breaking results), comments (on articles previously published in QJEP or on issues of general interest to experimental psychologists), and book reviews. Experimental results are welcomed from all relevant techniques, including behavioural testing, brain imaging and computational modelling. QJEP offers a competitive publication time-scale. Accepted Rapid Communications have priority in the publication cycle and usually appear in print within three months. We aim to publish all accepted (but uncorrected) articles online within seven days. Our Latest Articles page offers immediate publication of articles upon reaching their final form. The journal offers an open access option called Open Select, enabling authors to meet funder requirements to make their article free to read online for all in perpetuity. Authors also benefit from a broad and diverse subscription base that delivers the journal contents to a world-wide readership. Together these features ensure that the journal offers authors the opportunity to raise the visibility of their work to a global audience.
期刊最新文献
EXPRESS: Editorial: How do abstract representations enable transfer? EXPRESS: People can adaptively exploit model-free and model-based reinforcement learning in competitive games. EXPRESS: Attentional priority for temporary goals: Evidence with a confound-free dot-probe task. EXPRESS: The behavioral and neurophysiological evidence of the hierarchical orthographic representation of Chinese characters. EXPRESS: What Drives Object Selection? The Combined Role of Temporal Costs and Effort during Interactive Search.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1