Efficacy and safety of anti-thrombotic therapy after surgical mitral valve repair: a scoping review.

IF 2.8 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Open Heart Pub Date : 2025-01-30 DOI:10.1136/openhrt-2024-003158
Hazal Ece Babadagli, Jian Ye, Jenny Chen, Ricky Turgeon, Erica Hz Wang
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of anti-thrombotic therapy after surgical mitral valve repair: a scoping review.","authors":"Hazal Ece Babadagli, Jian Ye, Jenny Chen, Ricky Turgeon, Erica Hz Wang","doi":"10.1136/openhrt-2024-003158","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mitral valve repair (MVr) is the gold standard treatment for degenerative mitral regurgitation, yet there is ongoing controversy regarding optimal anti-thrombotic therapy post-MVr. This scoping review aimed to summarise current evidence on the safety and efficacy of anti-thrombotic therapy after MVr, identify knowledge gaps and propose a future study design.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Clinicaltrials.gov, the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and bibliographies of included trials, guidelines and other reviews from inception to 17 September 2024. Randomised controlled trials (RCT) and cohort and case-control studies assessing any anti-thrombotic therapy with any outcomes after MVr were included. Using a predefined collection form, two authors independently extracted data on study characteristics and results were summarised narratively into themes based on the PICO elements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1296 screened references, we included 11 studies (10 cohort and one non-inferiority RCT). All studies compared vitamin K antagonist (VKA) to an anti-platelet, direct oral anti-coagulant or no anti-thrombotic therapy for median duration of 90 days. Thromboembolic and bleeding event incidences ranged from 0% to 14.3% and 0% to 9.1%, respectively. Seven studies reported no difference in thromboembolic events, and three reported reduced rates with VKA compared with control, while results for bleeding events varied widely. The RCT found edoxaban was non-inferior to warfarin for thromboembolic outcomes, but not for bleeding. Substantial methodological and clinical heterogeneity, high risk of bias and insufficient mitigation of confounders, such as concomitant atrial fibrillation, were prevalent across studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on this scoping review, existing literature on anti-thrombotic therapy after MVr is inconclusive due to design limitations. We proposed a study design for a pragmatic RCT that addresses prior study limitations and that could provide definitive evidence to guide anti-thrombotic management in MVr patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":19505,"journal":{"name":"Open Heart","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11784107/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Heart","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2024-003158","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Mitral valve repair (MVr) is the gold standard treatment for degenerative mitral regurgitation, yet there is ongoing controversy regarding optimal anti-thrombotic therapy post-MVr. This scoping review aimed to summarise current evidence on the safety and efficacy of anti-thrombotic therapy after MVr, identify knowledge gaps and propose a future study design.

Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Clinicaltrials.gov, the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and bibliographies of included trials, guidelines and other reviews from inception to 17 September 2024. Randomised controlled trials (RCT) and cohort and case-control studies assessing any anti-thrombotic therapy with any outcomes after MVr were included. Using a predefined collection form, two authors independently extracted data on study characteristics and results were summarised narratively into themes based on the PICO elements.

Results: Of 1296 screened references, we included 11 studies (10 cohort and one non-inferiority RCT). All studies compared vitamin K antagonist (VKA) to an anti-platelet, direct oral anti-coagulant or no anti-thrombotic therapy for median duration of 90 days. Thromboembolic and bleeding event incidences ranged from 0% to 14.3% and 0% to 9.1%, respectively. Seven studies reported no difference in thromboembolic events, and three reported reduced rates with VKA compared with control, while results for bleeding events varied widely. The RCT found edoxaban was non-inferior to warfarin for thromboembolic outcomes, but not for bleeding. Substantial methodological and clinical heterogeneity, high risk of bias and insufficient mitigation of confounders, such as concomitant atrial fibrillation, were prevalent across studies.

Conclusion: Based on this scoping review, existing literature on anti-thrombotic therapy after MVr is inconclusive due to design limitations. We proposed a study design for a pragmatic RCT that addresses prior study limitations and that could provide definitive evidence to guide anti-thrombotic management in MVr patients.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
二尖瓣手术修复后抗血栓治疗的有效性和安全性:范围综述。
背景:二尖瓣修复(MVr)是退行性二尖瓣反流的金标准治疗方法,但关于MVr后最佳抗血栓治疗仍存在争议。本综述旨在总结MVr后抗血栓治疗安全性和有效性的现有证据,确定知识空白并提出未来的研究设计。方法:我们检索了MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane中央对照试验注册库、Clinicaltrials.gov、WHO国际临床试验注册平台和纳入的试验、指南和其他综述的参考文献,检索时间从成立到2024年9月17日。纳入随机对照试验(RCT)、队列和病例对照研究,评估MVr后抗血栓治疗的任何结果。使用预定义的收集形式,两位作者独立提取研究特征的数据,并根据PICO元素将结果以叙述性的方式总结为主题。结果:在1296篇筛选文献中,我们纳入了11项研究(10项队列研究和1项非劣效性随机对照研究)。所有研究都将维生素K拮抗剂(VKA)与抗血小板、直接口服抗凝剂或无抗血栓治疗进行了中位持续时间90天的比较。血栓栓塞和出血事件的发生率分别为0% - 14.3%和0% - 9.1%。7项研究报告血栓栓塞事件无差异,3项研究报告与对照组相比,VKA降低了发生率,而出血事件的结果差异很大。该随机对照试验发现,依多沙班在血栓栓塞结局方面不逊于华法林,但在出血方面则不逊于华法林。大量的方法学和临床异质性、高偏倚风险和混杂因素(如合并心房颤动)缓解不足在研究中普遍存在。结论:基于这一范围的回顾,由于设计的限制,现有的关于MVr后抗血栓治疗的文献尚无定论。我们提出了一项实用的RCT研究设计,以解决先前研究的局限性,并可以为指导MVr患者的抗血栓治疗提供明确的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Open Heart
Open Heart CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.70%
发文量
145
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Open Heart is an online-only, open access cardiology journal that aims to be “open” in many ways: open access (free access for all readers), open peer review (unblinded peer review) and open data (data sharing is encouraged). The goal is to ensure maximum transparency and maximum impact on research progress and patient care. The journal is dedicated to publishing high quality, peer reviewed medical research in all disciplines and therapeutic areas of cardiovascular medicine. Research is published across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Opinionated discussions on controversial topics are welcomed. Open Heart aims to operate a fast submission and review process with continuous publication online, to ensure timely, up-to-date research is available worldwide. The journal adheres to a rigorous and transparent peer review process, and all articles go through a statistical assessment to ensure robustness of the analyses. Open Heart is an official journal of the British Cardiovascular Society.
期刊最新文献
Combined effect of educational attainment and diabetes on 1-year all-cause mortality in heart failure patients: findings from the National Heart Failure Registry, India. Long-term outcomes of mitral valve surgery in infective endocarditis: a single-centre UK experience. Chronotype-aligned exercise timing in middle-aged adults at cardiometabolic risk: a randomised controlled trial. Effect of a mobile health intervention optimised with artificial intelligence on blood pressure and other cardiovascular risk factors in adults with high blood pressure: rationale and design of My Intelligent Cardiac Assistant (MICArdiac) randomised controlled trial. Sex differences in risk factor control and medication adherence post-ACS: insights from the TEXTMEDS randomised clinical trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1