The impact of visual fidelity on screen-based virtual reality food choices: A randomized pilot study.

IF 2.6 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2025-01-30 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0312772
Bianca Curi Braga, Pejman Sajjadi, Mahda Bagher, Alexander Klippel, Jessica Menold, Travis Masterson
{"title":"The impact of visual fidelity on screen-based virtual reality food choices: A randomized pilot study.","authors":"Bianca Curi Braga, Pejman Sajjadi, Mahda Bagher, Alexander Klippel, Jessica Menold, Travis Masterson","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0312772","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To understand the impact of fidelity and perceived realism on virtual reality food choices, and task motivation, engagement, and interest.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Online.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>84 participants recruited from Amazon Mechanical Turk.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Participants were randomly assigned to either a high- (n = 43) or a low- (n = 41) visual fidelity environment and were asked to select foods to have a meal with a friend.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Food choice, motivation of food choices, engagement, and interest.</p><p><strong>Analysis: </strong>Simple linear regressions between visual fidelity and perceived realism, and log-linear regressions for visual fidelity or perceived realism on either motivation, interest, or engagement. Poisson models between visual fidelity or perceived realism, and food selections.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Manipulating visual fidelity was not associated with perceived realism, motivation, interest, or engagement in the food selection task. Perceived realism increased motivation by 0.3% (SE 0.056; p = 0.022), interest by 1.4% (SE 0.002; p<0.001), and engagement by 0.9% (SE 0.001; p<0.001) in the food selection task. High visual fidelity decreased the total number of foods selected (B = 0.216; CI (-0.384; -0.047); p = 0.012).</p><p><strong>Conclusion and implications: </strong>Perceived realism, but not visual fidelity, is important for task related factors like motivation, engagement, and interest. Visual fidelity may influence some food selections.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"20 1","pages":"e0312772"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11781705/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0312772","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To understand the impact of fidelity and perceived realism on virtual reality food choices, and task motivation, engagement, and interest.

Design: Randomized controlled trial.

Setting: Online.

Participants: 84 participants recruited from Amazon Mechanical Turk.

Intervention: Participants were randomly assigned to either a high- (n = 43) or a low- (n = 41) visual fidelity environment and were asked to select foods to have a meal with a friend.

Main outcome measures: Food choice, motivation of food choices, engagement, and interest.

Analysis: Simple linear regressions between visual fidelity and perceived realism, and log-linear regressions for visual fidelity or perceived realism on either motivation, interest, or engagement. Poisson models between visual fidelity or perceived realism, and food selections.

Results: Manipulating visual fidelity was not associated with perceived realism, motivation, interest, or engagement in the food selection task. Perceived realism increased motivation by 0.3% (SE 0.056; p = 0.022), interest by 1.4% (SE 0.002; p<0.001), and engagement by 0.9% (SE 0.001; p<0.001) in the food selection task. High visual fidelity decreased the total number of foods selected (B = 0.216; CI (-0.384; -0.047); p = 0.012).

Conclusion and implications: Perceived realism, but not visual fidelity, is important for task related factors like motivation, engagement, and interest. Visual fidelity may influence some food selections.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
视觉保真度对基于屏幕的虚拟现实食物选择的影响:一项随机试点研究。
目的:了解保真度和感知真实感对虚拟现实食物选择、任务动机、参与和兴趣的影响。设计:随机对照试验。设置:在线。参与者:84名来自亚马逊土耳其机器人的参与者。干预:参与者被随机分配到高(n = 43)或低(n = 41)视觉保真度的环境中,并被要求选择与朋友一起用餐的食物。主要结果测量:食物选择、食物选择动机、参与和兴趣。分析:视觉保真度和感知现实性之间的简单线性回归,以及视觉保真度或感知现实性在动机、兴趣或参与度方面的对数线性回归。泊松模型之间的视觉保真度或感知现实主义,和食物的选择。结果:操纵视觉保真度与感知真实性、动机、兴趣或参与食物选择任务无关。感知到的现实性使动机增加0.3% (SE 0.056;p = 0.022),利息下降1.4% (SE 0.002;结论和启示:感知真实感,而不是视觉逼真度,对任务相关因素,如动机、参与和兴趣很重要。视觉保真度可能会影响某些食物的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
期刊最新文献
Adaptability factors and behavioral biases of investors in frontier markets: An adaptive market hypothesis perspective. HiMSC and EV derived treatments increase Quality of Life and reduce amount of Knee Replacement Surgeries compared to current standard of care for knee osteoarthritis patients in The Netherlands. A priming nudge targeting innovative farmers: A large-scale survey experiment. A pathway study of university embeddedness in provincial innovation systems based on field theory: Empirical evidence from China. Individual and cumulative effects of social determinants of health on cardiovascular disease: Gender-specific insights from a cross-sectional NHANES study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1