Perspectives of digital cognitive behavioural therapy for functional dyspepsia: qualitative interviews using thematic analysis.

IF 1.9 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Psychology & Health Pub Date : 2025-01-30 DOI:10.1080/08870446.2025.2459269
Isabella Pickering, Mikaela Law, Stefan Calder, Greg O'Grady, Elizabeth Broadbent
{"title":"Perspectives of digital cognitive behavioural therapy for functional dyspepsia: qualitative interviews using thematic analysis.","authors":"Isabella Pickering, Mikaela Law, Stefan Calder, Greg O'Grady, Elizabeth Broadbent","doi":"10.1080/08870446.2025.2459269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) has shown efficacy in improving mental health and symptoms of functional dyspepsia (FD), a prevalent disorder of gut-brain interaction (DGBI). However, FD-specific CBT is not widely available or scalable. Therefore, this study explored the perspectives of patients with FD and clinicians who treat them on the use of digital CBT-based interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods and measures: </strong>This qualitative study involved semi-structured interviews with 21 patients with FD and 10 clinicians. Iterative, inductive thematic analysis was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three patient themes were developed: (1) their experiences contributing to coping difficulties, emphasising the complexity of self-management; (2) a desire for more personalised options, highlighting the need for accessible, FD-tailored CBT; and (3) concerns regarding human contact, safety, usability, and data security. Four clinician themes were also developed: (1) digital CBT bridges a gap in psychological support within gastroenterology; (2) perceived clinical utility of CBT; (3) digital CBT allows patient self-management; and (4) clinical concerns, including symptom tracking and patient safety.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both patients and clinicians recognised the value and utility of digital CBT for FD. Tailored, digital CBT could inform and improve current management, making FD-specific psychological support more accessible.</p>","PeriodicalId":20718,"journal":{"name":"Psychology & Health","volume":" ","pages":"1-18"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2025.2459269","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) has shown efficacy in improving mental health and symptoms of functional dyspepsia (FD), a prevalent disorder of gut-brain interaction (DGBI). However, FD-specific CBT is not widely available or scalable. Therefore, this study explored the perspectives of patients with FD and clinicians who treat them on the use of digital CBT-based interventions.

Methods and measures: This qualitative study involved semi-structured interviews with 21 patients with FD and 10 clinicians. Iterative, inductive thematic analysis was conducted.

Results: Three patient themes were developed: (1) their experiences contributing to coping difficulties, emphasising the complexity of self-management; (2) a desire for more personalised options, highlighting the need for accessible, FD-tailored CBT; and (3) concerns regarding human contact, safety, usability, and data security. Four clinician themes were also developed: (1) digital CBT bridges a gap in psychological support within gastroenterology; (2) perceived clinical utility of CBT; (3) digital CBT allows patient self-management; and (4) clinical concerns, including symptom tracking and patient safety.

Conclusion: Both patients and clinicians recognised the value and utility of digital CBT for FD. Tailored, digital CBT could inform and improve current management, making FD-specific psychological support more accessible.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
功能性消化不良的数字认知行为疗法的观点:使用专题分析的定性访谈。
目的:认知行为疗法(CBT)已显示出改善心理健康和功能性消化不良(FD)症状的疗效,FD是一种常见的肠-脑相互作用(DGBI)疾病。然而,特定于fd的CBT并不广泛可用或可扩展。因此,本研究探讨了FD患者和治疗他们的临床医生对使用基于数字cbt的干预措施的看法。方法和措施:本定性研究包括对21例FD患者和10名临床医生进行半结构化访谈。进行了迭代、归纳的主题分析。结果:开发了三个患者主题:(1)他们的经历有助于应对困难,强调自我管理的复杂性;(2)对更个性化选择的渴望,突出了对可访问的、针对fd的CBT的需求;(3)对人类接触、安全性、可用性和数据安全性的关注。研究还提出了四个临床主题:(1)数字CBT弥补了胃肠病学中心理支持的差距;(2)认知CBT的临床效用;(3)数字化CBT允许患者自我管理;(4)临床问题,包括症状跟踪和患者安全。结论:患者和临床医生都认可数字化CBT治疗FD的价值和效用。量身定制的数字CBT可以告知和改善当前的管理,使fd特定的心理支持更容易获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
3.00%
发文量
95
期刊介绍: Psychology & Health promotes the study and application of psychological approaches to health and illness. The contents include work on psychological aspects of physical illness, treatment processes and recovery; psychosocial factors in the aetiology of physical illnesses; health attitudes and behaviour, including prevention; the individual-health care system interface particularly communication and psychologically-based interventions. The journal publishes original research, and accepts not only papers describing rigorous empirical work, including meta-analyses, but also those outlining new psychological approaches and interventions in health-related fields.
期刊最新文献
'The coronavirus is a formidable foe': children's multimodal articulations of SARS-CoV-2 virus and COVID-19 pandemic experiences in China. Individuals' top values and health behavior engagement: results of a National US Survey. South Asian Muslim individuals' lived experiences of Type 2 Diabetes healthcare - 'I just want someone to actually break it down for me'. Clarifying the importance and moderating roles of temporal self-regulation theory across behaviour types. Associations of stressful life events with stress symptoms and well-being of adolescent refugees: mediation by post-migration stressors and protective resources?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1