Does fast running limit numerical variability of the vertebral column in rabbits and hares (Leporidae: Lagomorpha)?

IF 2.9 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES Royal Society Open Science Pub Date : 2025-01-29 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1098/rsos.241813
Megu Gunji, Nuttakorn Taewcharoen, Fumio Yamada, Emma Sherratt
{"title":"Does fast running limit numerical variability of the vertebral column in rabbits and hares (Leporidae: Lagomorpha)?","authors":"Megu Gunji, Nuttakorn Taewcharoen, Fumio Yamada, Emma Sherratt","doi":"10.1098/rsos.241813","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In mammalian vertebral columns, locomotive ability is expected to be an evolutionary driver of variation in the number of vertebrae; in species evolved to run fast or have a flexible vertebral column, they generally have limited numerical variation and low occurrence of malformed vertebrae to maintain their running performance. Although this hypothesis is supported among species sharing similar locomotive constraints (e.g. dorsomobile versus dorsostable species), whether it applies at the within-species level is unknown. We test this hypothesis using species of Leporidae (rabbits and hares) with different locomotive abilities: we examined the number of presacral vertebrae and the frequency of abnormalities in 504 specimens from 4 species, representing cursorial, saltatorial and generalist modes. Our results show that the cursorial leporids had the lowest numerical variability and fewest abnormalities within species, although this was not statistically different from saltatorial or generalist species. We also identified 11 conditions of vertebral abnormality previously unexplored and theorize that each may pose different degrees of locomotive impairment and effects on species' fitness. The lack of statistical support for the hypothesis at a finer phylogenetic level suggests further research is needed to understand whether numerical variability is under stabilizing selection or a developmental response to locomotive constraints in cursorial animals.</p>","PeriodicalId":21525,"journal":{"name":"Royal Society Open Science","volume":"12 1","pages":"241813"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11774590/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Royal Society Open Science","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.241813","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In mammalian vertebral columns, locomotive ability is expected to be an evolutionary driver of variation in the number of vertebrae; in species evolved to run fast or have a flexible vertebral column, they generally have limited numerical variation and low occurrence of malformed vertebrae to maintain their running performance. Although this hypothesis is supported among species sharing similar locomotive constraints (e.g. dorsomobile versus dorsostable species), whether it applies at the within-species level is unknown. We test this hypothesis using species of Leporidae (rabbits and hares) with different locomotive abilities: we examined the number of presacral vertebrae and the frequency of abnormalities in 504 specimens from 4 species, representing cursorial, saltatorial and generalist modes. Our results show that the cursorial leporids had the lowest numerical variability and fewest abnormalities within species, although this was not statistically different from saltatorial or generalist species. We also identified 11 conditions of vertebral abnormality previously unexplored and theorize that each may pose different degrees of locomotive impairment and effects on species' fitness. The lack of statistical support for the hypothesis at a finer phylogenetic level suggests further research is needed to understand whether numerical variability is under stabilizing selection or a developmental response to locomotive constraints in cursorial animals.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
快速跑步是否限制了家兔脊柱的数值变异性?
在哺乳动物脊柱中,运动能力被认为是脊椎骨数量变化的进化驱动因素;在进化为跑得快或具有灵活脊柱的物种中,它们通常具有有限的数值变化和很少发生畸形的椎骨以维持其跑步性能。尽管这一假设在具有相似运动约束的物种(例如,背移动物种与背稳定物种)中得到支持,但它是否适用于种内水平尚不清楚。我们使用具有不同运动能力的狐科动物(兔子和野兔)来验证这一假设:我们检查了来自4个物种的504个标本的骶前椎骨数量和异常频率,代表了游移,跳跃和一般模式。结果表明,游猎类的数量变异最小,种内异常最少,但与跃迁类和多面手类没有统计学差异。我们还发现了11种以前未发现的椎体异常情况,并推测每种情况都可能造成不同程度的运动障碍和对物种适应性的影响。这一假设在更精细的系统发育水平上缺乏统计支持,这表明需要进一步的研究来了解数字变异是在稳定选择下还是在游猎动物对运动约束的发育反应下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Royal Society Open Science
Royal Society Open Science Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
508
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Royal Society Open Science is a new open journal publishing high-quality original research across the entire range of science on the basis of objective peer-review. The journal covers the entire range of science and mathematics and will allow the Society to publish all the high-quality work it receives without the usual restrictions on scope, length or impact.
期刊最新文献
Desert lizards modulate nutritional responses to match seasonal biological needs. A dynamical measure of algorithmically infused visibility. Chicks of cavity-nesting birds do not 'exercise' prior to fledging. A total evidence approach justifies taxonomic splitting of the endangered Pecos gambusia into three species. Do scarcity-related cues affect the sustained attentional performance of the poor and the rich differently?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1