Feasibility and time gain of implementing artificial intelligence-based delineation tools in daily magnetic resonance image-guided adaptive prostate cancer radiotherapy.

IF 3.4 Q2 ONCOLOGY Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology Pub Date : 2024-12-28 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.phro.2024.100694
Maximilian Lukas Konrad, Carsten Brink, Anders Smedegaard Bertelsen, Ebbe Laugaard Lorenzen, Bahar Celik, Christina Junker Nyborg, Lars Dysager, Tine Schytte, Uffe Bernchou
{"title":"Feasibility and time gain of implementing artificial intelligence-based delineation tools in daily magnetic resonance image-guided adaptive prostate cancer radiotherapy.","authors":"Maximilian Lukas Konrad, Carsten Brink, Anders Smedegaard Bertelsen, Ebbe Laugaard Lorenzen, Bahar Celik, Christina Junker Nyborg, Lars Dysager, Tine Schytte, Uffe Bernchou","doi":"10.1016/j.phro.2024.100694","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Daily magnetic resonance image (MRI)-guided radiotherapy plan adaptation requires time-consuming manual contour edits of targets and organs at risk in the online workflow. Recent advances in auto-segmentation promise to deliver high-quality delineations within a short time frame. However, the actual time benefit in a clinical setting is unknown. The current study investigated the feasibility and time gain of implementing online artificial intelligence (AI)-based delineations at a 1.5 T MRI-Linac.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Fifteen consecutive prostate cancer patients, treated to 60 Gy in 20 fractions at a 1.5 T MRI-Linac, were included in the study. The first 5 patients (Group 1) were treated using the standard contouring workflow for all fractions. The last 10 patients (Group 2) were treated with the standard workflow for fractions 1 up to 3 (Group 2 - Standard) and an AI-based workflow for the remaining fractions (Group 2 - AI). AI delineations were delivered using an in-house developed AI inference service and an in-house trained nnU-Net.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The AI-based workflow reduced delineation time from 9.8 to 5.3 min. The variance in delineation time seemed to increase during the treatment course for Group 1, while the delineation time for the AI-based workflow was constant (Group 2 - AI). Fewer occurrences of readaptation due to target movement occurred with the AI-based workflow.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implementing an AI-based workflow at the 1.5 T MRI-Linac is feasible and reduces the delineation time. Lower variance in delineation duration supports a better ability to plan daily treatment schedules and avoids delays.</p>","PeriodicalId":36850,"journal":{"name":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","volume":"33 ","pages":"100694"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11780162/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2024.100694","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: Daily magnetic resonance image (MRI)-guided radiotherapy plan adaptation requires time-consuming manual contour edits of targets and organs at risk in the online workflow. Recent advances in auto-segmentation promise to deliver high-quality delineations within a short time frame. However, the actual time benefit in a clinical setting is unknown. The current study investigated the feasibility and time gain of implementing online artificial intelligence (AI)-based delineations at a 1.5 T MRI-Linac.

Materials and methods: Fifteen consecutive prostate cancer patients, treated to 60 Gy in 20 fractions at a 1.5 T MRI-Linac, were included in the study. The first 5 patients (Group 1) were treated using the standard contouring workflow for all fractions. The last 10 patients (Group 2) were treated with the standard workflow for fractions 1 up to 3 (Group 2 - Standard) and an AI-based workflow for the remaining fractions (Group 2 - AI). AI delineations were delivered using an in-house developed AI inference service and an in-house trained nnU-Net.

Results: The AI-based workflow reduced delineation time from 9.8 to 5.3 min. The variance in delineation time seemed to increase during the treatment course for Group 1, while the delineation time for the AI-based workflow was constant (Group 2 - AI). Fewer occurrences of readaptation due to target movement occurred with the AI-based workflow.

Conclusion: Implementing an AI-based workflow at the 1.5 T MRI-Linac is feasible and reduces the delineation time. Lower variance in delineation duration supports a better ability to plan daily treatment schedules and avoids delays.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology
Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology Physics and Astronomy-Radiation
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
18.90%
发文量
93
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Adaptive radiotherapy in locally advanced head and neck cancer: The importance of reduced margins. Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging responses in head and neck cancer patients treated with magnetic resonance-guided hypofractionated radiation therapy. New guidelines and recommendations to advance treatment planning in proton therapy. Feasibility and time gain of implementing artificial intelligence-based delineation tools in daily magnetic resonance image-guided adaptive prostate cancer radiotherapy. Recommendations for reporting and evaluating proton therapy beyond dose and constant relative biological effectiveness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1