Emergency planned re-infusion therapy and hospitalisation for community-acquired pneumonia: a retrospective case-control study.

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Global Health Pub Date : 2025-01-31 DOI:10.7189/jogh.15.04044
Sheng-Xian Chen, Zhi-Kai Yang, Lin Lin, Hou-Zhen Liao, Xiao-Ting Xiang, Di Liu, Jian-Shan Huang
{"title":"Emergency planned re-infusion therapy and hospitalisation for community-acquired pneumonia: a retrospective case-control study.","authors":"Sheng-Xian Chen, Zhi-Kai Yang, Lin Lin, Hou-Zhen Liao, Xiao-Ting Xiang, Di Liu, Jian-Shan Huang","doi":"10.7189/jogh.15.04044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a frequent reason for emergency department visits and leads to increased direct medical costs, particularly due to hospitalisation. This study aims to examine the differences between emergency planned re-infusion therapy and hospitalisation in patients with CAP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective case-control study involved 1889 CAP patients treated at the Emergency Internal Medicine Department of Class A tertiary Hospital in China from 1 January 2020 to 31 December 2022. Patients were divided into groups receiving either emergency planned re-infusion therapy or hospitalisation. Independent sample t tests and χ<sup>2</sup> tests were used to compare the clinical outcomes and economic impacts between the two groups across different pneumonia severity index (PSI) classifications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study enrolled 1889 CAP patients. For PSI I-II patients, the improvement rates were 99.51% in the emergency planned re-infusion therapy group and 99.69% in the hospitalisation group, showing no statistically significant difference (P > 0.05). Similarly, no significant difference was observed for PSI III patients (84.16 vs. 89.82%). However, significant differences emerged for PSI IV patients, with improvement rates of 50% in the emergency planned re-infusion therapy group and 90.59% in the hospitalisation group (P < 0.001). Statistically significant differences were also noted in treatment duration (5.13 ± 1.65 days vs. 7.60 ± 3.93 days, P < 0.001) and total treatment costs (1921.57 Chinese Yuan (CNY) ± 923.16 vs. 9083.80 CNY ± 3583.55, P < 0.001) between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Emergency planned re-infusion therapy for CAP is an effective and cost-efficient alternative that can reduce both treatment duration and costs, particularly for patients with PSI I-III. It is recommended that emergency physicians give priority to emergency re-infusion therapy for patients with PSI I-III. In addition, it is recommended that hospitals strengthen the classification and treatment training programmes for emergency department physicians to recognise the patients with PSI I-IV.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>The hospital<sup>'</sup>s ethics committee (XMCGIRB2024034-01).</p>","PeriodicalId":48734,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Health","volume":"15 ","pages":"04044"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11783337/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.15.04044","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is a frequent reason for emergency department visits and leads to increased direct medical costs, particularly due to hospitalisation. This study aims to examine the differences between emergency planned re-infusion therapy and hospitalisation in patients with CAP.

Methods: This retrospective case-control study involved 1889 CAP patients treated at the Emergency Internal Medicine Department of Class A tertiary Hospital in China from 1 January 2020 to 31 December 2022. Patients were divided into groups receiving either emergency planned re-infusion therapy or hospitalisation. Independent sample t tests and χ2 tests were used to compare the clinical outcomes and economic impacts between the two groups across different pneumonia severity index (PSI) classifications.

Results: The study enrolled 1889 CAP patients. For PSI I-II patients, the improvement rates were 99.51% in the emergency planned re-infusion therapy group and 99.69% in the hospitalisation group, showing no statistically significant difference (P > 0.05). Similarly, no significant difference was observed for PSI III patients (84.16 vs. 89.82%). However, significant differences emerged for PSI IV patients, with improvement rates of 50% in the emergency planned re-infusion therapy group and 90.59% in the hospitalisation group (P < 0.001). Statistically significant differences were also noted in treatment duration (5.13 ± 1.65 days vs. 7.60 ± 3.93 days, P < 0.001) and total treatment costs (1921.57 Chinese Yuan (CNY) ± 923.16 vs. 9083.80 CNY ± 3583.55, P < 0.001) between the two groups.

Conclusions: Emergency planned re-infusion therapy for CAP is an effective and cost-efficient alternative that can reduce both treatment duration and costs, particularly for patients with PSI I-III. It is recommended that emergency physicians give priority to emergency re-infusion therapy for patients with PSI I-III. In addition, it is recommended that hospitals strengthen the classification and treatment training programmes for emergency department physicians to recognise the patients with PSI I-IV.

Registration: The hospital's ethics committee (XMCGIRB2024034-01).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社区获得性肺炎的紧急计划再输液治疗和住院治疗:一项回顾性病例对照研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Global Health
Journal of Global Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.80%
发文量
240
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Global Health is a peer-reviewed journal published by the Edinburgh University Global Health Society, a not-for-profit organization registered in the UK. We publish editorials, news, viewpoints, original research and review articles in two issues per year.
期刊最新文献
Benefits and challenges of cervical cancer screening since the implementation of the 'two cancer' screening programme in China: findings from Shangyu, Zhejiang in 2019-23. Care cascades of diabetes and hypertension among late adolescents in India. Erratum: Akter E, Hossain AT, Ahamed B, Rahman MH, Hossain AKMT, Barua U, Islam MS, Manna RM, Hossain MA, Ara T, Usmani NG, Chandra P, Ameen S, Jabeen S, Ahmed A, Rahman TZ, Hassan MMU, Islam A, Barr BT, Rahman QS, Arifeen SE, Rahman AE. Excess mortality during COVID-19 and prediction of mortality in Bangladesh: an analysis based on death records in urban graveyards. J Glob Health. 2025;15:04050. Global epidemiology, viral evolution, and public health responses: a systematic review on Mpox (1958-2024). Impact of intensive health education on influenza vaccination and acute exacerbations in outpatients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a real-world study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1