Simulation-based training program effect on pediatric nurses' knowledge and performance regarding heel-prick during newborn blood screening test.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING BMC Nursing Pub Date : 2025-01-29 DOI:10.1186/s12912-024-02657-7
Abdulaziz Asiri, Abeer A Almowafy, Shimaa M Moursy, Hanan A Abd-Elhay, Shimaa Abdelrahim Khalaf Ahmed, Aml S Abdelrahem, Marim T Abo Seif, Faransa A Ahmed
{"title":"Simulation-based training program effect on pediatric nurses' knowledge and performance regarding heel-prick during newborn blood screening test.","authors":"Abdulaziz Asiri, Abeer A Almowafy, Shimaa M Moursy, Hanan A Abd-Elhay, Shimaa Abdelrahim Khalaf Ahmed, Aml S Abdelrahem, Marim T Abo Seif, Faransa A Ahmed","doi":"10.1186/s12912-024-02657-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>One of the best ways to impart important skills to trainees is through simulation-based training, which is more reliable than the conventional clinical examination method. It is used in pediatric nursing training to allow nurses to practice and improve their clinical and conversational skills during an actual child encounter. A heel-prick is a complex psychomotor task that requires skill and knowledge from the pediatric nurse performing the procedure while applying for the National Newborn Screening Program.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to assess the impact of simulation-based training on pediatric nurses' knowledge and performance regarding the heel-prick technique used during newborn blood screening tests in select hospitals in Saudi Arabia and Egypt.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study utilized an experimental pre-test and post-test design. The G*Power Program<sup>®</sup> Version 3.1.9.4 was employed to determine the sample size to fulfil the study's objectives. The sample consisted of 50 nurses recruited from the Maternity & Children Hospital Bisha, Al-Namas General Hospital in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, and Pediatric Assiut University Hospital in Egypt; they were randomly divided into two groups of 25 nurses, intervention and control. The sample size was calculated assuming α level of 0.05, a β level of 0.20, and a desired power of 80%. The study was conducted from June 1st to August 30th, 2023. Two data collection instruments were used: a structured questionnaire and an observational checklist for the heel-prick technique in newborn bloodspot screening sample collection. Before the training intervention, a pre-test assessing knowledge and performance was administered. Intervention and control groups received two hours of instruction every 5 days. The researcher utilized PowerPoint presentations, videos, and interactive learning session intervention to deliver the instructional content to increase nurses' knowledge and also employed mannequins for a newborn blood spot test simulator to train participants on performance. A post-test 1 was administered immediately after the training sessions. Additionally, post-test 2 was conducted 20 days after the study and followed up after 40 days of intervention (post-test 3).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study participants ranged in age from 25 to 30 years, with the majority being female. A statistically significant difference was observed in the knowledge and performance of pediatric nurses following simulation-based training. The majority of nurses demonstrated correct responses after the simulation-based learning intervention. However, the nurses' knowledge varied, as evidenced by the mean scores of their total knowledge regarding the heel-prick for the newborn bloodspot screening test. Immediately after the learning intervention session, the mean scores were 37.86 ± 1.28 and 34.84 ± 1.22 in the experimental and control groups, respectively. At 20 days post-training, the mean scores were 40.16 ± 1.11 and 33.55 ± 1.18 in the experimental and control groups, respectively, with a highly statistically significant difference (P-value = 0.0001). Moreover, at 40 days post-training, the mean scores were 39.54 ± 1.09 and 29.66 ± 1.32 in the experimental and control groups, respectively, and a statistically significant difference was found (P-value = 0.0001). Conversely, the level of nurses' performance before training was below average, with 52% and 56% in the experimental and control groups, respectively. Immediately after the simulation-based learning, the majority of nurses in the experimental group demonstrated a good level of performance in post-test 1, post-test 2, and post-test 3, with a statistically significant difference compared to the nurses in the control group (P-value = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of newborn blood spot test simulators is useful during simulation-based training in raising the overall level of the pediatric nurses' knowledge and performance, especially through 1, 2, & 3 post-training tests. The findings have several practical implications, and one is that pediatric nurses' performance and knowledge concerning newborn blood screening tests should be prioritized to guarantee patient safety and quality of care in pediatric patient scenarios. It is essential for nursing trainers to effectively train pediatric nurses' by using simulators to improve their caring knowledge and performance in educational settings. By improving nurses' knowledge and performance, we can reduce the dangers caused by their training on real neonates; also, it can be an attractive way to train nurses when trained by simulators and ultimately enhance the overall quality of nursing services in the hospital.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>This study was registered by Clinical Trials.gov Identifier: (NCT06685471|| https://www.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrials: </strong>gov/ ) with the clinical Trail registry (12-11-2024).</p>","PeriodicalId":48580,"journal":{"name":"BMC Nursing","volume":"24 1","pages":"110"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11776318/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-024-02657-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: One of the best ways to impart important skills to trainees is through simulation-based training, which is more reliable than the conventional clinical examination method. It is used in pediatric nursing training to allow nurses to practice and improve their clinical and conversational skills during an actual child encounter. A heel-prick is a complex psychomotor task that requires skill and knowledge from the pediatric nurse performing the procedure while applying for the National Newborn Screening Program.

Aim: This study aimed to assess the impact of simulation-based training on pediatric nurses' knowledge and performance regarding the heel-prick technique used during newborn blood screening tests in select hospitals in Saudi Arabia and Egypt.

Methods: This study utilized an experimental pre-test and post-test design. The G*Power Program® Version 3.1.9.4 was employed to determine the sample size to fulfil the study's objectives. The sample consisted of 50 nurses recruited from the Maternity & Children Hospital Bisha, Al-Namas General Hospital in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, and Pediatric Assiut University Hospital in Egypt; they were randomly divided into two groups of 25 nurses, intervention and control. The sample size was calculated assuming α level of 0.05, a β level of 0.20, and a desired power of 80%. The study was conducted from June 1st to August 30th, 2023. Two data collection instruments were used: a structured questionnaire and an observational checklist for the heel-prick technique in newborn bloodspot screening sample collection. Before the training intervention, a pre-test assessing knowledge and performance was administered. Intervention and control groups received two hours of instruction every 5 days. The researcher utilized PowerPoint presentations, videos, and interactive learning session intervention to deliver the instructional content to increase nurses' knowledge and also employed mannequins for a newborn blood spot test simulator to train participants on performance. A post-test 1 was administered immediately after the training sessions. Additionally, post-test 2 was conducted 20 days after the study and followed up after 40 days of intervention (post-test 3).

Results: The study participants ranged in age from 25 to 30 years, with the majority being female. A statistically significant difference was observed in the knowledge and performance of pediatric nurses following simulation-based training. The majority of nurses demonstrated correct responses after the simulation-based learning intervention. However, the nurses' knowledge varied, as evidenced by the mean scores of their total knowledge regarding the heel-prick for the newborn bloodspot screening test. Immediately after the learning intervention session, the mean scores were 37.86 ± 1.28 and 34.84 ± 1.22 in the experimental and control groups, respectively. At 20 days post-training, the mean scores were 40.16 ± 1.11 and 33.55 ± 1.18 in the experimental and control groups, respectively, with a highly statistically significant difference (P-value = 0.0001). Moreover, at 40 days post-training, the mean scores were 39.54 ± 1.09 and 29.66 ± 1.32 in the experimental and control groups, respectively, and a statistically significant difference was found (P-value = 0.0001). Conversely, the level of nurses' performance before training was below average, with 52% and 56% in the experimental and control groups, respectively. Immediately after the simulation-based learning, the majority of nurses in the experimental group demonstrated a good level of performance in post-test 1, post-test 2, and post-test 3, with a statistically significant difference compared to the nurses in the control group (P-value = 0.001).

Conclusion: The use of newborn blood spot test simulators is useful during simulation-based training in raising the overall level of the pediatric nurses' knowledge and performance, especially through 1, 2, & 3 post-training tests. The findings have several practical implications, and one is that pediatric nurses' performance and knowledge concerning newborn blood screening tests should be prioritized to guarantee patient safety and quality of care in pediatric patient scenarios. It is essential for nursing trainers to effectively train pediatric nurses' by using simulators to improve their caring knowledge and performance in educational settings. By improving nurses' knowledge and performance, we can reduce the dangers caused by their training on real neonates; also, it can be an attractive way to train nurses when trained by simulators and ultimately enhance the overall quality of nursing services in the hospital.

Clinical trial number: This study was registered by Clinical Trials.gov Identifier: (NCT06685471|| https://www.

Clinicaltrials: gov/ ) with the clinical Trail registry (12-11-2024).

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于模拟的培训方案对儿科护士新生儿血液筛查中足跟刺检知识及表现的影响
背景:通过模拟训练是向实习生传授重要技能的最佳途径之一,这比传统的临床考核方法更可靠。它被用于儿科护理培训,让护士在实际的儿童遭遇中练习和提高他们的临床和会话技能。脚跟穿刺是一项复杂的精神运动任务,需要儿科护士在申请国家新生儿筛查计划时执行该程序的技能和知识。目的:本研究旨在评估在沙特阿拉伯和埃及选定的医院中,基于模拟的培训对儿科护士在新生儿血液筛查试验中使用的脚跟穿刺技术的知识和表现的影响。方法:采用实验前测和后测设计。采用G*Power Program®Version 3.1.9.4确定样本量以实现研究目标。样本包括从比沙妇幼医院、沙特阿拉伯王国Al-Namas综合医院和埃及阿西尤特儿科大学医院招募的50名护士;她们被随机分为两组,每组25名护士,干预组和对照组。假设α水平为0.05,β水平为0.20,期望功率为80%,计算样本量。该研究于2023年6月1日至8月30日进行。采用两种数据收集工具:一份结构化问卷和一份观察性检查表,用于新生儿血斑筛查样本收集中的脚跟穿刺技术。在培训干预前,进行知识和表现评估前测试。干预组和对照组每5天接受2小时的指导。研究者利用PowerPoint演示、视频和互动学习环节干预来传递教学内容,以增加护士的知识,并使用人体模型进行新生儿血斑测试模拟器来训练参与者的表现。训练结束后立即进行后测。此外,在研究后20天进行后测2,并在干预后40天进行随访(后测3)。结果:研究参与者年龄从25岁到30岁不等,以女性为主。在模拟培训后,儿科护士的知识和表现有统计学意义的差异。大多数护士在模拟学习干预后表现出正确的反应。然而,护士的知识各不相同,正如他们对新生儿血点筛查试验中脚跟刺破的总知识的平均分数所证明的那样。学习干预结束后,实验组和对照组的平均得分分别为37.86±1.28和34.84±1.22。训练后20 d,实验组和对照组的平均得分分别为40.16±1.11和33.55±1.18,差异有高度统计学意义(p值= 0.0001)。训练后40 d,实验组和对照组的平均得分分别为39.54±1.09和29.66±1.32,差异有统计学意义(p值= 0.0001)。相反,培训前护士的表现水平低于平均水平,实验组和对照组分别为52%和56%。在模拟学习结束后,实验组大多数护士在后测试1、后测试2和后测试3中表现良好,与对照组相比差异有统计学意义(p值= 0.001)。结论:在基于模拟的培训中,使用新生儿血斑测试模拟器有助于提高儿科护士的整体知识水平和工作水平,特别是通过培训后1、2、3次测试。研究结果有几个实际意义,其中一个是儿科护士在新生儿血液筛查测试方面的表现和知识应该优先考虑,以保证儿童患者的安全和护理质量。护理培训师必须通过使用模拟器有效地培训儿科护士,以提高他们在教育环境中的护理知识和表现。通过提高护士的知识和表现,我们可以减少他们对真实新生儿的培训所造成的危险;此外,通过模拟器对护士进行培训,最终提高医院护理服务的整体质量,是一种有吸引力的培训方式。临床试验号:本研究已在临床试验注册中心(12-11-2024)通过Clinical Trials.gov注册编号:(NCT06685471|| https://www.Clinicaltrials: gov/)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Nursing
BMC Nursing Nursing-General Nursing
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
317
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Nursing is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of nursing research, training, education and practice.
期刊最新文献
Influencing factors of innovative leadership of clinical nurses: a cross-sectional study. The influence of responsible leadership on nurse's career calling: a moderated mediation model of public service motivation and moral identity. Implementing nurse-led decarbonization practices: a transferable framework from a Spanish public hospital. Nursing decision-making for health policies during the COVID-19 pandemic in Europe: the ENVISION study. Predicted positions and qualification mismatch for master of nursing graduates in Croatian hospitals: cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1