Examining Heart Failure Informal Care Partners Using Person and System Levels and Domains: A Meta-Synthesis.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Western Journal of Nursing Research Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-31 DOI:10.1177/01939459251314716
Harleah G Buck, Angela Durante, Chelsea Howland, Heba Aldossary, Julie T Bidwell, Elliane Irani, Daniel Liebzeit, Angela Massouh, Martha Abshire Saylor, Michael A Stawnychy, Lucinda J Graven
{"title":"Examining Heart Failure Informal Care Partners Using Person and System Levels and Domains: A Meta-Synthesis.","authors":"Harleah G Buck, Angela Durante, Chelsea Howland, Heba Aldossary, Julie T Bidwell, Elliane Irani, Daniel Liebzeit, Angela Massouh, Martha Abshire Saylor, Michael A Stawnychy, Lucinda J Graven","doi":"10.1177/01939459251314716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Within the last decade, system and policy-level changes have driven substantial shifts in heart failure (HF) care from hospital to home, requiring greater support from informal care partners. What has not been examined is the state of the care partner science by person and system-level domains using qualitative studies to understand impact across multiple person and system levels.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>(1) Identify by person and system levels and domain what is known about informal care partners and (2) Identify gaps in the caregiving science and suggest ways to move forward.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This secondary analysis of a large HF systematic review is guided by the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities and MIRACLE frameworks and uses meta-synthesis techniques with critical realist approaches to synthesize and interpret the themes across papers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Using data from 46 papers and 1695 care partners, we identified patterns occurring across 6 domains (biological, behavioral, affective, physical/built environment, sociocultural environment, and healthcare system) and on 4 levels (individual, interpersonal, community, and societal). Existing research predominantly addressed affective and behavioral domains, followed by health system and sociocultural domains. Few studies focused on biological and physical/built environment domains, leaving large gaps in what is known about caregiving at the cellular (biological) and societal (community and societal) levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>HF caregiving continues to be studied at a very rudimentary level. This synthesis also reveals critical gaps in what is known about caregiving within the physical/built environment domain and at the community and societal levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":49365,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Nursing Research","volume":" ","pages":"261-281"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Western Journal of Nursing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01939459251314716","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Within the last decade, system and policy-level changes have driven substantial shifts in heart failure (HF) care from hospital to home, requiring greater support from informal care partners. What has not been examined is the state of the care partner science by person and system-level domains using qualitative studies to understand impact across multiple person and system levels.

Objectives: (1) Identify by person and system levels and domain what is known about informal care partners and (2) Identify gaps in the caregiving science and suggest ways to move forward.

Methods: This secondary analysis of a large HF systematic review is guided by the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities and MIRACLE frameworks and uses meta-synthesis techniques with critical realist approaches to synthesize and interpret the themes across papers.

Results: Using data from 46 papers and 1695 care partners, we identified patterns occurring across 6 domains (biological, behavioral, affective, physical/built environment, sociocultural environment, and healthcare system) and on 4 levels (individual, interpersonal, community, and societal). Existing research predominantly addressed affective and behavioral domains, followed by health system and sociocultural domains. Few studies focused on biological and physical/built environment domains, leaving large gaps in what is known about caregiving at the cellular (biological) and societal (community and societal) levels.

Conclusions: HF caregiving continues to be studied at a very rudimentary level. This synthesis also reveals critical gaps in what is known about caregiving within the physical/built environment domain and at the community and societal levels.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用人员和系统水平和领域检查心力衰竭非正式护理伙伴:一项综合研究。
背景:在过去十年中,系统和政策层面的变化推动了心力衰竭(HF)护理从医院到家庭的重大转变,需要来自非正式护理伙伴的更多支持。没有被检查的是护理伙伴科学在个人和系统级别领域的状态,使用定性研究来了解跨多个个人和系统级别的影响。目标:(1)按个人和系统级别和领域确定对非正式护理伙伴的了解;(2)确定护理科学方面的差距,并提出前进的方法。方法:在国家少数民族健康与健康差异研究所和MIRACLE框架的指导下,对一项大型心力衰竭系统综述进行了二次分析,并使用了综合技术和批判现实主义方法来综合和解释论文中的主题。结果:使用来自46篇论文和1695名护理伙伴的数据,我们确定了发生在6个领域(生物、行为、情感、物理/建筑环境、社会文化环境和医疗保健系统)和4个层面(个人、人际、社区和社会)的模式。现有的研究主要针对情感和行为领域,其次是卫生系统和社会文化领域。很少有研究关注生物和物理/建筑环境领域,在细胞(生物)和社会(社区和社会)水平上对护理的了解留下了很大的空白。结论:对心衰护理的研究仍处于非常初级的水平。这种综合还揭示了在物理/建筑环境领域以及社区和社会层面上对护理的了解存在重大差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Western Journal of Nursing Research (WJNR) is a widely read and respected peer-reviewed journal published twelve times a year providing an innovative forum for nurse researchers, students, and clinical practitioners to participate in ongoing scholarly dialogue. WJNR publishes research reports, systematic reviews, methodology papers, and invited special papers. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
期刊最新文献
Peer Support Among Nursing Students During Hospital-Based Clinical Placements: A Scoping Review. Pre-stroke Fulfilment of WHO Recommendations for Physical Activity: A Cross-Sectional Study. Mitigating Fraud in Online Surveys: A Methodological Approach. Exploring the Link Between Sense of Coherence, Cognitive Flexibility, and Well-Being in Patients With Schizophrenia: A Cross-Sectional Study. A Mixed-Methods Study of Daily Bedtime Routines of African American Family Caregivers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1