The relationship between AutoNRT thresholds and subjective programming levels revisited.

IF 1.2 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-30 DOI:10.1080/14670100.2025.2455891
Andreas Björsne, Lennart Magnusson
{"title":"The relationship between AutoNRT thresholds and subjective programming levels revisited.","authors":"Andreas Björsne, Lennart Magnusson","doi":"10.1080/14670100.2025.2455891","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study wasto systemically examine the relationship between AutoNRT thresholds and subjective programming levels by controlling for individual subject variation, and further, to propose an alternative way to calculate the AutoNRT threshold profile for programming purposes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was a prospective observational study. AutoNRT thresholds, T- and C-levels were recorded at six and twelve months after activation. All subjects had received a CI24RE implant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-one adults participated in the study. A linear mixed-effects model analysis of the relationship between the AutoNRT thresholds and the T-and C-levels resulted in a large unexplainable variation between subjects, the standard deviation was between 15.42 and 18.89 CL. However, the study showed that the profiles for the T- and C-levels could be predicted with an acceptable accuracy from AutoNRT. A model for calculating profiles from AutoNRT thresholds based on linear regression resulted in the lowest deviation from the subjective programming thresholds, with somewhat better results for C-levels than T-levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results from this study showed that the predictability was reasonable when calculating the profiles for the T- and C-levels based on AutoNRT. And, further, that AutoNRT thresholds can be used when programming cochlear implants, to make global adjustments without predicting actual T- or C-levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":53553,"journal":{"name":"COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL","volume":" ","pages":"1-11"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14670100.2025.2455891","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study wasto systemically examine the relationship between AutoNRT thresholds and subjective programming levels by controlling for individual subject variation, and further, to propose an alternative way to calculate the AutoNRT threshold profile for programming purposes.

Methods: The study was a prospective observational study. AutoNRT thresholds, T- and C-levels were recorded at six and twelve months after activation. All subjects had received a CI24RE implant.

Results: Forty-one adults participated in the study. A linear mixed-effects model analysis of the relationship between the AutoNRT thresholds and the T-and C-levels resulted in a large unexplainable variation between subjects, the standard deviation was between 15.42 and 18.89 CL. However, the study showed that the profiles for the T- and C-levels could be predicted with an acceptable accuracy from AutoNRT. A model for calculating profiles from AutoNRT thresholds based on linear regression resulted in the lowest deviation from the subjective programming thresholds, with somewhat better results for C-levels than T-levels.

Conclusion: The results from this study showed that the predictability was reasonable when calculating the profiles for the T- and C-levels based on AutoNRT. And, further, that AutoNRT thresholds can be used when programming cochlear implants, to make global adjustments without predicting actual T- or C-levels.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
重新审视了autort阈值与主观编程水平之间的关系。
目的:本研究的目的是通过控制个体受试者的变化,系统地检查AutoNRT阈值与主观规划水平之间的关系,并进一步提出一种用于规划目的的计算AutoNRT阈值的替代方法。方法:采用前瞻性观察研究。激活后6个月和12个月记录自动激活阈值、T和c水平。所有受试者均接受了CI24RE植入。结果:41名成年人参与了这项研究。AutoNRT阈值与t和c水平之间的线性混合效应模型分析导致受试者之间存在较大的无法解释的差异,标准差在15.42 ~ 18.89 CL之间。然而,研究表明,T-和c -水平的剖面可以用AutoNRT预测出可接受的准确性。基于线性回归的AutoNRT阈值计算概要的模型与主观编程阈值的偏差最小,c级比t级的结果要好一些。结论:本研究结果表明,基于AutoNRT计算T-和c -水平分布时,可预测性是合理的。而且,AutoNRT阈值可以在编程人工耳蜗植入时使用,在不预测实际T或c水平的情况下进行全局调整。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL
COCHLEAR IMPLANTS INTERNATIONAL Medicine-Otorhinolaryngology
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: Cochlear Implants International was founded as an interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal in response to the growing number of publications in the field of cochlear implants. It was designed to meet a need to include scientific contributions from all the disciplines that are represented in cochlear implant teams: audiology, medicine and surgery, speech therapy and speech pathology, psychology, hearing therapy, radiology, pathology, engineering and acoustics, teaching, and communication. The aim was to found a truly interdisciplinary journal, representing the full breadth of the field of cochlear implantation.
期刊最新文献
Facebook as a resource for cochlear implant information: a thematic content analysis. Hearing loss and cochlear implantation in Chudley McCullough syndrome: A case series. Clinical significance of the mastoid emissary vein in paediatric Osia implantation. Investigating the association between pre-implantation cognitive performance and one-year post-implantation speech perception outcomes in adult cochlear implant recipients using the repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status for hearing impaired individuals (RBANS-H). Predictive value of automated cognivue cognitive assessment for cochlear implant outcomes - a preliminary study in a private otolaryngology practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1