Epidemiology of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Colonization in Neonates within Neonatal Intensive Care Units: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Seraphine Nkie Esemu, Arnol Bowo-Ngandji, Roland Ndip Ndip, Jane-Francis Tatah Kihla Akoachere, Nene Kaah Keneh, Jean Thierry Ebogo-Belobo, Cyprien Kengne-Ndé, Donatien Serge Mbaga, Nicholas Tendongfor, Hortense Kamga Gonsu, Jean Paul Assam Assam, Lucy Mande Ndip
{"title":"Epidemiology of Methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> Colonization in Neonates within Neonatal Intensive Care Units: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Seraphine Nkie Esemu, Arnol Bowo-Ngandji, Roland Ndip Ndip, Jane-Francis Tatah Kihla Akoachere, Nene Kaah Keneh, Jean Thierry Ebogo-Belobo, Cyprien Kengne-Ndé, Donatien Serge Mbaga, Nicholas Tendongfor, Hortense Kamga Gonsu, Jean Paul Assam Assam, Lucy Mande Ndip","doi":"10.4103/jgid.jgid_95_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (MRSA) colonization in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) is a significant global health concern, leading to severe infections, extended hospital stays, and substantial economic burdens on health-care systems. To develop effective infection control strategies, we need to fill existing gaps in our understanding of MRSA epidemiology in neonates. The aim of this systematic review is to provide an extensive analysis of the proportion of MRSA colonizations in NICUs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used a comprehensive search strategy across databases such as Medline, Embase, Global Health, Web of Science, and Global Index Medicus, in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Articles were independently reviewed and selected based on a variety of criteria, including the inclusion of neonates tested for MRSA colonization during NICU stay, and the reporting of community-acquired and hospital-acquired MRSA (CA-MRSA and HA-MRSA) incidence levels. Exclusion criteria included studies outside NICUs, those focused on specific MRSA outbreaks or clinical infections, review studies, and those lacking abstracts or full texts. Five authors independently extracted data, which was summarized and checked for quality. Statistical analysis included a random-effects model to compute pooled proportions, stratification by geographical location, evaluation of heterogeneity, and examination of publication bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our systematic review evaluated 62 studies out of an initial 536 records identified. The majority of the selected studies were conducted in high-income countries, primarily in the United States. From these studies, we estimated a cumulative incidence rate of 7.2% for MRSA colonization in NICUs. When the source of MRSA was considered, CA-MRSA incidence was 2.7%, while HA-MRSA incidence was notably higher at 11%. A subgroup analysis showed geographical differences in the cumulative incidence of MRSA colonization in NICUs, with Brazil having the lowest incidence and Taiwan the highest. The proportion of HA-MRSA colonization also varied significantly by country, with South Korea reporting higher incidence rates than the United States. However, the differences in CA-MRSA colonization rates between countries and WHO regions were not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our systematic review found a cumulative incidence of 7.2% for MRSA colonization in NICUs, with HA-MRSA (11%) being more prevalent than CA-MRSA (2.7%). Regional variations were detected, with Taiwan exhibiting the highest cumulative incidence and South Korea having both the highest CA-MRSA and HA-MRSA. These findings underline the substantial public health impact of MRSA, especially in NICUs, necessitating context-specific prevention and control strategies. Future research should strive to address these regional disparities and aspire to attain a more globally representative understanding of MRSA colonization rates.</p>","PeriodicalId":51581,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Global Infectious Diseases","volume":"16 4","pages":"160-182"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11775395/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Global Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jgid.jgid_95_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) colonization in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) is a significant global health concern, leading to severe infections, extended hospital stays, and substantial economic burdens on health-care systems. To develop effective infection control strategies, we need to fill existing gaps in our understanding of MRSA epidemiology in neonates. The aim of this systematic review is to provide an extensive analysis of the proportion of MRSA colonizations in NICUs.
Methods: We used a comprehensive search strategy across databases such as Medline, Embase, Global Health, Web of Science, and Global Index Medicus, in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Articles were independently reviewed and selected based on a variety of criteria, including the inclusion of neonates tested for MRSA colonization during NICU stay, and the reporting of community-acquired and hospital-acquired MRSA (CA-MRSA and HA-MRSA) incidence levels. Exclusion criteria included studies outside NICUs, those focused on specific MRSA outbreaks or clinical infections, review studies, and those lacking abstracts or full texts. Five authors independently extracted data, which was summarized and checked for quality. Statistical analysis included a random-effects model to compute pooled proportions, stratification by geographical location, evaluation of heterogeneity, and examination of publication bias.
Results: Our systematic review evaluated 62 studies out of an initial 536 records identified. The majority of the selected studies were conducted in high-income countries, primarily in the United States. From these studies, we estimated a cumulative incidence rate of 7.2% for MRSA colonization in NICUs. When the source of MRSA was considered, CA-MRSA incidence was 2.7%, while HA-MRSA incidence was notably higher at 11%. A subgroup analysis showed geographical differences in the cumulative incidence of MRSA colonization in NICUs, with Brazil having the lowest incidence and Taiwan the highest. The proportion of HA-MRSA colonization also varied significantly by country, with South Korea reporting higher incidence rates than the United States. However, the differences in CA-MRSA colonization rates between countries and WHO regions were not statistically significant.
Conclusions: Our systematic review found a cumulative incidence of 7.2% for MRSA colonization in NICUs, with HA-MRSA (11%) being more prevalent than CA-MRSA (2.7%). Regional variations were detected, with Taiwan exhibiting the highest cumulative incidence and South Korea having both the highest CA-MRSA and HA-MRSA. These findings underline the substantial public health impact of MRSA, especially in NICUs, necessitating context-specific prevention and control strategies. Future research should strive to address these regional disparities and aspire to attain a more globally representative understanding of MRSA colonization rates.
新生儿重症监护病房(NICUs)耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)定植是一个重大的全球卫生问题,导致严重感染,延长住院时间,并给卫生保健系统带来巨大的经济负担。为了制定有效的感染控制策略,我们需要填补我们对新生儿MRSA流行病学的理解空白。本系统综述的目的是对新生儿重症监护病房中MRSA菌落的比例进行广泛分析。方法:根据系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目,我们在Medline、Embase、Global Health、Web of Science和Global Index Medicus等数据库中使用了综合搜索策略。文章是根据各种标准独立审查和选择的,包括新生儿在新生儿重症监护病房住院期间进行MRSA定植检测,以及报告社区获得性和医院获得性MRSA (CA-MRSA和HA-MRSA)发病率水平。排除标准包括新生儿重症监护病房以外的研究、关注特定MRSA爆发或临床感染的研究、综述性研究以及缺乏摘要或全文的研究。5位作者独立提取数据,对数据进行汇总和质量检查。统计分析包括一个随机效应模型来计算合并比例、按地理位置分层、异质性评估和发表偏倚检查。结果:我们的系统综述评估了最初确定的536项记录中的62项研究。大多数选定的研究是在高收入国家进行的,主要是在美国。从这些研究中,我们估计MRSA在新生儿重症监护病房的累积发病率为7.2%。考虑MRSA的来源时,CA-MRSA的发病率为2.7%,HA-MRSA的发病率明显更高,为11%。亚组分析显示,重症监护病房MRSA定殖累积发病率存在地域差异,巴西发病率最低,台湾最高。HA-MRSA定殖的比例也因国家而异,韩国报告的发病率高于美国。然而,CA-MRSA定殖率在各国和WHO区域之间的差异无统计学意义。结论:我们的系统回顾发现,MRSA在新生儿重症监护病房的定殖累积发生率为7.2%,HA-MRSA(11%)比CA-MRSA(2.7%)更普遍。发现了地区差异,台湾的累积发病率最高,韩国的CA-MRSA和HA-MRSA均最高。这些发现强调了MRSA对公共卫生的重大影响,特别是在新生儿重症监护室,需要针对具体情况采取预防和控制策略。未来的研究应努力解决这些地区差异,并渴望获得对MRSA定殖率更具全球代表性的理解。
期刊介绍:
JGID encourages research, education and dissemination of knowledge in the field of Infectious Diseases across the world thus promoting translational research by striking a synergy between basic science, clinical medicine and public health. The Journal intends to bring together scientists and academicians in Infectious Diseases to promote translational synergy between Laboratory Science, Clinical Medicine and Public Health. The Journal invites Original Articles, Clinical Investigations, Epidemiological Analysis, Data Protocols, Case Reports, Clinical Photographs, review articles and special commentaries. Students, Residents, Academicians, Public Health experts and scientists are all encouraged to be a part of this initiative by contributing, reviewing and promoting scientific works and science.