Provision of Radiology Reports Simplified With Large Language Models to Patients With Cancer: Impact on Patient Satisfaction.

IF 3.3 Q2 ONCOLOGY JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-29 DOI:10.1200/CCI-24-00166
Amit Gupta, Swarndeep Singh, Hema Malhotra, Himanshu Pruthi, Aparna Sharma, Amit K Garg, Mukesh Yadav, Devasenathipathy Kandasamy, Atul Batra, Krithika Rangarajan
{"title":"Provision of Radiology Reports Simplified With Large Language Models to Patients With Cancer: Impact on Patient Satisfaction.","authors":"Amit Gupta, Swarndeep Singh, Hema Malhotra, Himanshu Pruthi, Aparna Sharma, Amit K Garg, Mukesh Yadav, Devasenathipathy Kandasamy, Atul Batra, Krithika Rangarajan","doi":"10.1200/CCI-24-00166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To explore the perceived utility and effect of simplified radiology reports on oncology patients' knowledge and feasibility of large language models (LLMs) to generate such reports.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This study was approved by the Institute Ethics Committee. In phase I, five state-of-the-art LLMs (Generative Pre-Trained Transformer-4o [GPT-4o], Google Gemini, Claude Opus, Llama-3.1-8B, and Phi-3.5-mini) were tested to simplify 50 oncology computed tomography (CT) report impressions using five distinct prompts with each LLM. The outputs were evaluated quantitatively using readability indices. Five LLM-prompt combinations with best average readability scores were also assessed qualitatively, and the best LLM-prompt combination was selected. In phase II, 100 consecutive oncology patients were randomly assigned into two groups: original report (received original report impression) and simplified report (received LLM-generated simplified versions of their CT report impressions under the supervision of a radiologist). A questionnaire assessed the impact of these reports on patients' knowledge and perceived utility.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In phase I, Claude Opus-Prompt 3 (explain to a 15-year-old) performed slightly better than other LLMs, although scores for GPT-4o, Gemini, Claude Opus, and Llama-3.1 were not significantly different (<i>P</i> > .0033 on Wilcoxon signed-rank test with Bonferroni correction). In phase II, simplified report group patients demonstrated significantly better knowledge of primary site and extent of their disease as well as showed significantly higher confidence and understanding of the report (<i>P</i> < .05 for all). Only three (of 50) simplified reports required corrections by the radiologist.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Simplified radiology reports significantly enhanced patients' understanding and confidence in comprehending their medical condition. LLMs performed very well at this simplification task; therefore, they can be potentially used for this purpose, although there remains a need for human oversight.</p>","PeriodicalId":51626,"journal":{"name":"JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics","volume":"9 ","pages":"e2400166"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/CCI-24-00166","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To explore the perceived utility and effect of simplified radiology reports on oncology patients' knowledge and feasibility of large language models (LLMs) to generate such reports.

Materials and methods: This study was approved by the Institute Ethics Committee. In phase I, five state-of-the-art LLMs (Generative Pre-Trained Transformer-4o [GPT-4o], Google Gemini, Claude Opus, Llama-3.1-8B, and Phi-3.5-mini) were tested to simplify 50 oncology computed tomography (CT) report impressions using five distinct prompts with each LLM. The outputs were evaluated quantitatively using readability indices. Five LLM-prompt combinations with best average readability scores were also assessed qualitatively, and the best LLM-prompt combination was selected. In phase II, 100 consecutive oncology patients were randomly assigned into two groups: original report (received original report impression) and simplified report (received LLM-generated simplified versions of their CT report impressions under the supervision of a radiologist). A questionnaire assessed the impact of these reports on patients' knowledge and perceived utility.

Results: In phase I, Claude Opus-Prompt 3 (explain to a 15-year-old) performed slightly better than other LLMs, although scores for GPT-4o, Gemini, Claude Opus, and Llama-3.1 were not significantly different (P > .0033 on Wilcoxon signed-rank test with Bonferroni correction). In phase II, simplified report group patients demonstrated significantly better knowledge of primary site and extent of their disease as well as showed significantly higher confidence and understanding of the report (P < .05 for all). Only three (of 50) simplified reports required corrections by the radiologist.

Conclusion: Simplified radiology reports significantly enhanced patients' understanding and confidence in comprehending their medical condition. LLMs performed very well at this simplification task; therefore, they can be potentially used for this purpose, although there remains a need for human oversight.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
190
期刊最新文献
CFO: Calibration-Free Odds Bayesian Designs for Dose Finding in Clinical Trials. Patient-Reported Outcomes: Comparing Functional Avoidance and Standard Thoracic Radiation Therapy in Lung Cancer. Advancements in Interoperability: Achieving Anatomic Pathology Reports That Adhere to International Standards and Are Both Human-Readable and Readily Computable. Incorporating Structured and Unstructured Data Sources to Identify and Characterize Hereditary Cancer Testing Among Veterans With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. Leveraging Radiotherapy Data for Precision Oncology: Veterans Affairs Granular Radiotherapy Information Database.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1