What's on the agenda? Examining public health communication about opioids.

IF 2.2 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Journal of Health Psychology Pub Date : 2025-12-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-30 DOI:10.1177/13591053241312043
Erin Willis, Ye Wang, Somaieh Goudarzvand, Yugyung Lee
{"title":"What's on the agenda? Examining public health communication about opioids.","authors":"Erin Willis, Ye Wang, Somaieh Goudarzvand, Yugyung Lee","doi":"10.1177/13591053241312043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The way media portray public health problems influences the public's perception of problems and related solutions. Social media allows users to engage with news and to collectively construct meaning. This paper examined news in comparison to user-generated content related to opioids to understand the role of second-level agenda-setting in public health. We analyzed 162,760 tweets about the opioid crisis, and compared the main topics and their sentiments with 2998 opioid stories from <i>The New York Times</i> online. Evidence from this study suggests that second-level agenda setting on social media is different from the news; public communication about opioids on X/Twitter highlights attributes that are different from the ones highlighted in news. The findings suggest that public health communication should strategically utilize social media data, including obtaining consumer insight from personal tweets, listening to diverse views and warning signs from issue tweets, and tuning to the media for policy trends.</p>","PeriodicalId":51355,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"4366-4384"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13591053241312043","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The way media portray public health problems influences the public's perception of problems and related solutions. Social media allows users to engage with news and to collectively construct meaning. This paper examined news in comparison to user-generated content related to opioids to understand the role of second-level agenda-setting in public health. We analyzed 162,760 tweets about the opioid crisis, and compared the main topics and their sentiments with 2998 opioid stories from The New York Times online. Evidence from this study suggests that second-level agenda setting on social media is different from the news; public communication about opioids on X/Twitter highlights attributes that are different from the ones highlighted in news. The findings suggest that public health communication should strategically utilize social media data, including obtaining consumer insight from personal tweets, listening to diverse views and warning signs from issue tweets, and tuning to the media for policy trends.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
议程上有什么?检查关于阿片类药物的公共卫生传播。
媒体描述公共卫生问题的方式影响公众对问题和相关解决办法的看法。社交媒体允许用户参与新闻并共同构建意义。本文将新闻与与阿片类药物相关的用户生成内容进行了比较,以了解二级议程设置在公共卫生中的作用。我们分析了162760条关于阿片类药物危机的推文,并将主要话题及其情绪与《纽约时报》在线上的2998条阿片类药物故事进行了比较。本研究的证据表明,社交媒体上的二级议程设置不同于新闻;在X/Twitter上关于阿片类药物的公共传播突出了与新闻中突出的属性不同的属性。研究结果表明,公共卫生传播应战略性地利用社交媒体数据,包括从个人推特中获取消费者洞察,从议题推特中听取不同观点和警告信号,以及通过媒体了解政策趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Health Psychology
Journal of Health Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
3.10%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: ournal of Health Psychology is an international peer-reviewed journal that aims to support and help shape research in health psychology from around the world. It provides a platform for traditional empirical analyses as well as more qualitative and/or critically oriented approaches. It also addresses the social contexts in which psychological and health processes are embedded. Studies published in this journal are required to obtain ethical approval from an Institutional Review Board. Such approval must include informed, signed consent by all research participants. Any manuscript not containing an explicit statement concerning ethical approval and informed consent will not be considered.
期刊最新文献
Exploring the role of negative urgency in body dissatisfaction in young adults. Can cognitive impairments explain cardiovascular emotional dampening associated with elevated blood pressure? Comparison of the illness perception between age-related macular degeneration and glaucoma patients living in a middle-income country. The verbal and psychological correlates of disenfranchising talk. Predicting resilience among health social workers during COVID-19.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1