Emphasis on Financial vs Nonfinancial Criteria in Employer Benefits' Measurements.

IF 11.3 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES JAMA Health Forum Pub Date : 2025-01-03 DOI:10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.5229
Jeffrey Pfeffer, Esther Olsen, Sara J Singer
{"title":"Emphasis on Financial vs Nonfinancial Criteria in Employer Benefits' Measurements.","authors":"Jeffrey Pfeffer, Esther Olsen, Sara J Singer","doi":"10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.5229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Few studies have examined the extent to which employers emphasize financial over nonfinancial criteria in measurement, reporting, and decision-making about health care benefits.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To measure and identify factors associated with financial over nonfinancial emphasis in employer decision-making about health benefits.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>A survey was administered to a nationally representative sample of US employers to assess the extent of employers' emphasis on benefits plans' costs over member experience, access to care, and equity, and on financial vs other considerations when choosing third-party benefits administrators. The sample included in-company human resources administrators from randomly selected nongovernmental organizations with at least 50 employees. The survey was administered in 2 waves: May 2022 to July 2022 and November 2022 to April 2023.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>The survey included 41 multipart questions capturing information about the respondent, company, company interactions with benefits consulting firms and benefits administrators, and company approach to managing employee health benefits.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Main outcomes were proportion of financially oriented measures that internal benefits administrators and external benefits consultants use and importance of financial vs other factors in companies' choice of third-party administrators.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1159 companies sampled, 251 (22%) responded; 30 with less than 50 employees were excluded. Of the 221 remaining companies, 147 (67%) used a benefits consulting firm. The companies and their benefits consultants focused on financial over nonfinancial performance dimensions in decision-making. While 125 companies (74%) tracked trends in health benefits costs and 109 (64%) tracked spending on the highest cost cases, only 14 (8%) tracked time employees spent having questions answered, and 12 (7%) tracked how often employees delayed receiving care because of an insurance company's actions. This financial focus was largely independent of organizational characteristics and other potential explanatory factors. Of 37 paired differences comparisons in the proportion of financial vs nonfinancial items, only 6 proportions (16%) differed significantly, with differences in proportions of 0.22 or less.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this survey study, US employers emphasized financial over nonfinancial criteria in their measurement and decision-making about health benefits. To improve health plan performance, employer measurement and decision-making must emphasize both nonfinancial and financial criteria.</p>","PeriodicalId":53180,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Health Forum","volume":"6 1","pages":"e245229"},"PeriodicalIF":11.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11786228/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Health Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.5229","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Few studies have examined the extent to which employers emphasize financial over nonfinancial criteria in measurement, reporting, and decision-making about health care benefits.

Objective: To measure and identify factors associated with financial over nonfinancial emphasis in employer decision-making about health benefits.

Design, setting, and participants: A survey was administered to a nationally representative sample of US employers to assess the extent of employers' emphasis on benefits plans' costs over member experience, access to care, and equity, and on financial vs other considerations when choosing third-party benefits administrators. The sample included in-company human resources administrators from randomly selected nongovernmental organizations with at least 50 employees. The survey was administered in 2 waves: May 2022 to July 2022 and November 2022 to April 2023.

Exposure: The survey included 41 multipart questions capturing information about the respondent, company, company interactions with benefits consulting firms and benefits administrators, and company approach to managing employee health benefits.

Main outcomes and measures: Main outcomes were proportion of financially oriented measures that internal benefits administrators and external benefits consultants use and importance of financial vs other factors in companies' choice of third-party administrators.

Results: Of 1159 companies sampled, 251 (22%) responded; 30 with less than 50 employees were excluded. Of the 221 remaining companies, 147 (67%) used a benefits consulting firm. The companies and their benefits consultants focused on financial over nonfinancial performance dimensions in decision-making. While 125 companies (74%) tracked trends in health benefits costs and 109 (64%) tracked spending on the highest cost cases, only 14 (8%) tracked time employees spent having questions answered, and 12 (7%) tracked how often employees delayed receiving care because of an insurance company's actions. This financial focus was largely independent of organizational characteristics and other potential explanatory factors. Of 37 paired differences comparisons in the proportion of financial vs nonfinancial items, only 6 proportions (16%) differed significantly, with differences in proportions of 0.22 or less.

Conclusions and relevance: In this survey study, US employers emphasized financial over nonfinancial criteria in their measurement and decision-making about health benefits. To improve health plan performance, employer measurement and decision-making must emphasize both nonfinancial and financial criteria.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
雇主福利衡量中强调财务与非财务标准。
重要性:很少有研究调查雇主在医疗福利的衡量、报告和决策中强调财务而非财务标准的程度。目的:测量和识别雇主在健康福利决策中财务比非财务重点的相关因素。设计、设置和参与者:对美国雇主的全国代表性样本进行了一项调查,以评估雇主在选择第三方福利管理人员时对福利计划成本的重视程度,而不是成员经验、获得护理和公平,以及财务和其他考虑因素。样本包括随机选择的至少有50名员工的非政府组织的公司内部人力资源管理人员。该调查分两批进行:2022年5月至2022年7月和2022年11月至2023年4月。曝光:调查包括41个多部分问题,收集了有关受访者、公司、公司与福利咨询公司和福利管理人员的互动以及公司管理员工健康福利的方法的信息。主要结果和措施:主要结果是内部福利管理人员和外部福利顾问使用财务导向措施的比例,以及公司选择第三方管理人员时财务因素与其他因素的重要性。结果:在1159家抽样公司中,251家(22%)做出了回应;雇员少于50人的30家公司被排除在外。在剩下的221家公司中,有147家(67%)使用了福利咨询公司。公司和他们的福利顾问在决策时更注重财务绩效而不是非财务绩效。125家公司(74%)跟踪了医疗福利成本的趋势,109家公司(64%)跟踪了成本最高的案例的支出,但只有14家(8%)跟踪了员工花在回答问题上的时间,12家(7%)跟踪了员工因保险公司的行为而延迟接受治疗的频率。这种财务重点在很大程度上独立于组织特征和其他可能的解释因素。在财务项目与非财务项目比例的37个配对差异比较中,只有6个比例(16%)存在显著差异,比例差异为0.22或更小。结论和相关性:在这项调查研究中,美国雇主在衡量和决策健康福利时强调财务而不是非财务标准。为了提高健康计划的绩效,雇主的衡量和决策必须同时强调非财务和财务标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
7.80%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: JAMA Health Forum is an international, peer-reviewed, online, open access journal that addresses health policy and strategies affecting medicine, health, and health care. The journal publishes original research, evidence-based reports, and opinion about national and global health policy. It covers innovative approaches to health care delivery and health care economics, access, quality, safety, equity, and reform. In addition to publishing articles, JAMA Health Forum also features commentary from health policy leaders on the JAMA Forum. It covers news briefs on major reports released by government agencies, foundations, health policy think tanks, and other policy-focused organizations. JAMA Health Forum is a member of the JAMA Network, which is a consortium of peer-reviewed, general medical and specialty publications. The journal presents curated health policy content from across the JAMA Network, including journals such as JAMA and JAMA Internal Medicine.
期刊最新文献
Failing to Account for Real-World Complexities in Health Policy. JAMA Health Forum. Changes in Physician Emigration and Density After the 2010 WHO Global Code of Practice. Linkage of Emergency Department Patients With Public Benefits Navigators via Text Messages: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Human Papillomavirus Vaccination Policies and Discourse on Social Media.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1