Emphasis on Financial vs Nonfinancial Criteria in Employer Benefits' Measurements.

IF 9.5 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES JAMA Health Forum Pub Date : 2025-01-03 DOI:10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.5229
Jeffrey Pfeffer, Esther Olsen, Sara J Singer
{"title":"Emphasis on Financial vs Nonfinancial Criteria in Employer Benefits' Measurements.","authors":"Jeffrey Pfeffer, Esther Olsen, Sara J Singer","doi":"10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.5229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Few studies have examined the extent to which employers emphasize financial over nonfinancial criteria in measurement, reporting, and decision-making about health care benefits.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To measure and identify factors associated with financial over nonfinancial emphasis in employer decision-making about health benefits.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>A survey was administered to a nationally representative sample of US employers to assess the extent of employers' emphasis on benefits plans' costs over member experience, access to care, and equity, and on financial vs other considerations when choosing third-party benefits administrators. The sample included in-company human resources administrators from randomly selected nongovernmental organizations with at least 50 employees. The survey was administered in 2 waves: May 2022 to July 2022 and November 2022 to April 2023.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>The survey included 41 multipart questions capturing information about the respondent, company, company interactions with benefits consulting firms and benefits administrators, and company approach to managing employee health benefits.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>Main outcomes were proportion of financially oriented measures that internal benefits administrators and external benefits consultants use and importance of financial vs other factors in companies' choice of third-party administrators.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1159 companies sampled, 251 (22%) responded; 30 with less than 50 employees were excluded. Of the 221 remaining companies, 147 (67%) used a benefits consulting firm. The companies and their benefits consultants focused on financial over nonfinancial performance dimensions in decision-making. While 125 companies (74%) tracked trends in health benefits costs and 109 (64%) tracked spending on the highest cost cases, only 14 (8%) tracked time employees spent having questions answered, and 12 (7%) tracked how often employees delayed receiving care because of an insurance company's actions. This financial focus was largely independent of organizational characteristics and other potential explanatory factors. Of 37 paired differences comparisons in the proportion of financial vs nonfinancial items, only 6 proportions (16%) differed significantly, with differences in proportions of 0.22 or less.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this survey study, US employers emphasized financial over nonfinancial criteria in their measurement and decision-making about health benefits. To improve health plan performance, employer measurement and decision-making must emphasize both nonfinancial and financial criteria.</p>","PeriodicalId":53180,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Health Forum","volume":"6 1","pages":"e245229"},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11786228/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Health Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamahealthforum.2024.5229","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Few studies have examined the extent to which employers emphasize financial over nonfinancial criteria in measurement, reporting, and decision-making about health care benefits.

Objective: To measure and identify factors associated with financial over nonfinancial emphasis in employer decision-making about health benefits.

Design, setting, and participants: A survey was administered to a nationally representative sample of US employers to assess the extent of employers' emphasis on benefits plans' costs over member experience, access to care, and equity, and on financial vs other considerations when choosing third-party benefits administrators. The sample included in-company human resources administrators from randomly selected nongovernmental organizations with at least 50 employees. The survey was administered in 2 waves: May 2022 to July 2022 and November 2022 to April 2023.

Exposure: The survey included 41 multipart questions capturing information about the respondent, company, company interactions with benefits consulting firms and benefits administrators, and company approach to managing employee health benefits.

Main outcomes and measures: Main outcomes were proportion of financially oriented measures that internal benefits administrators and external benefits consultants use and importance of financial vs other factors in companies' choice of third-party administrators.

Results: Of 1159 companies sampled, 251 (22%) responded; 30 with less than 50 employees were excluded. Of the 221 remaining companies, 147 (67%) used a benefits consulting firm. The companies and their benefits consultants focused on financial over nonfinancial performance dimensions in decision-making. While 125 companies (74%) tracked trends in health benefits costs and 109 (64%) tracked spending on the highest cost cases, only 14 (8%) tracked time employees spent having questions answered, and 12 (7%) tracked how often employees delayed receiving care because of an insurance company's actions. This financial focus was largely independent of organizational characteristics and other potential explanatory factors. Of 37 paired differences comparisons in the proportion of financial vs nonfinancial items, only 6 proportions (16%) differed significantly, with differences in proportions of 0.22 or less.

Conclusions and relevance: In this survey study, US employers emphasized financial over nonfinancial criteria in their measurement and decision-making about health benefits. To improve health plan performance, employer measurement and decision-making must emphasize both nonfinancial and financial criteria.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
相关文献
Design, Synthesis, Antiproliferative Screening, and In Silico Studies of Some Pyridinyl-Pyrimidine Candidates
IF 2 3区 化学Journal of Heterocyclic ChemistryPub Date : 2024-12-29 DOI: 10.1002/jhet.4945
Ali H. Abdelrahman, Mohammad E. Azab, Mohamed A. Hegazy, Ahmed Labena, Sayed K. Ramadan
Design, Synthesis, In Silico and In Vitro Evaluation of Novel Pyrimidine Derivatives as EGFR Inhibitors.
IF 2.8 4区 医学Anti-cancer agents in medicinal chemistryPub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI: 10.2174/1871520620666200721102726
Gurubasavaraja S P Matada, Nahid Abbas, Prasad S Dhiwar, Rajdeep Basu, Giles Devasahayam
Design, synthesis, in silico studies and in vitro evaluation of isatin-pyridine oximes hybrids as novel acetylcholinesterase reactivators.
IF 5.6 2区 医学Journal of Enzyme Inhibition and Medicinal ChemistryPub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI: 10.1080/14756366.2021.1916009
Daniel A S Kitagawa, Rafael B Rodrigues, Thiago N Silva, Wellington V Dos Santos, Vinicius C V da Rocha, Joyce S F D de Almeida, Leandro B Bernardo, Taynara Carvalho-Silva, Cintia N Ferreira, Angelo A T da Silva, Alessandro B C Simas, Eugenie Nepovimova, Kamil Kuča, Tanos C C França, Samir F de A Cavalcante
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
7.80%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: JAMA Health Forum is an international, peer-reviewed, online, open access journal that addresses health policy and strategies affecting medicine, health, and health care. The journal publishes original research, evidence-based reports, and opinion about national and global health policy. It covers innovative approaches to health care delivery and health care economics, access, quality, safety, equity, and reform. In addition to publishing articles, JAMA Health Forum also features commentary from health policy leaders on the JAMA Forum. It covers news briefs on major reports released by government agencies, foundations, health policy think tanks, and other policy-focused organizations. JAMA Health Forum is a member of the JAMA Network, which is a consortium of peer-reviewed, general medical and specialty publications. The journal presents curated health policy content from across the JAMA Network, including journals such as JAMA and JAMA Internal Medicine.
期刊最新文献
The Hard Road Ahead for State Public Health Departments. Enhanced COVID-19 Provider Relief, Hospital Finances, and Care for Medicare Inpatients. JAMA Health Forum. Newborn Screening for Sickle Cell Disease and Thalassemia. Population-Based Payments to Deliver Health Care to Unhoused Individuals.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1