Current airway management practice among Swiss anesthesiologists : Results of a national survey.

IF 1 Die Anaesthesiologie Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-30 DOI:10.1007/s00101-024-01499-x
Simone Mackert, Manuel Walker, Nina Pirlich, Jörg C Schäuble, Abimael Cardenas Marban, Michael T Ganter, Urs Eichenberger, Matthias Nübling, Thomas Heidegger
{"title":"Current airway management practice among Swiss anesthesiologists : Results of a national survey.","authors":"Simone Mackert, Manuel Walker, Nina Pirlich, Jörg C Schäuble, Abimael Cardenas Marban, Michael T Ganter, Urs Eichenberger, Matthias Nübling, Thomas Heidegger","doi":"10.1007/s00101-024-01499-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While limited data on the impact of implementing guidelines in airway management on outcomes exist, there is a consensus that the implementation and the adherence to guidelines enhance patient safety. Recently, the Swiss Society for Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine (SSAPM) endorsed the guidelines of The Fondation Latine des Voies Aériennes (FLAVA) as the official guidelines for airway management in Switzerland. This study aimed to determine current practice of airway management in Switzerland.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the available equipment, the differences between institutions and between specialists and residents in dealing with airway management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In collaboration with the SSAPM, a covering letter with a survey link to the questionnaire used in the online airway management survey among German anesthesiologists was sent to all heads of departments of anesthesia and members of the SSAPM in August 2023. The participants (residents and specialists) were asked about their personal and institutional backgrounds, access to airway management devices, awareness of recognized airway management guidelines and the importance and application of airway management techniques.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 555 anesthesiologists participated in the survey (response rate 21%). The main findings were: in general, Swiss anesthesia departments are well-equipped and adhere to airway management guidelines. The guidelines of FLAVA are only known by just over 50%. The vast majority used the traditional screening tests to identify an airway that might be potentially difficult to manage. Of the respondents, 25% still adhere to the myth that a mask ventilation check is necessary before the administration of a muscle relaxant and 14% said that their institution used video laryngoscopy as the primary intubation device. More than 80% think that the expertise to perform awake fiberoptic intubation is important for their daily practice; however, 31% consider their expertise in this technique to be insufficient. In other words, there is a big safety gap.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Swiss anesthesia departments are well-equipped and adhere to airway management guidelines. The need for regular training to gain and maintain expertise in managing difficult airways, especially to future specialists, still prevails. Thus, developing and establishing a nationwide educational program in airway management and its continuous evaluation would be a milestone for patient safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":72805,"journal":{"name":"Die Anaesthesiologie","volume":" ","pages":"89-96"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Die Anaesthesiologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-024-01499-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: While limited data on the impact of implementing guidelines in airway management on outcomes exist, there is a consensus that the implementation and the adherence to guidelines enhance patient safety. Recently, the Swiss Society for Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine (SSAPM) endorsed the guidelines of The Fondation Latine des Voies Aériennes (FLAVA) as the official guidelines for airway management in Switzerland. This study aimed to determine current practice of airway management in Switzerland.

Objective: To determine the available equipment, the differences between institutions and between specialists and residents in dealing with airway management.

Methods: In collaboration with the SSAPM, a covering letter with a survey link to the questionnaire used in the online airway management survey among German anesthesiologists was sent to all heads of departments of anesthesia and members of the SSAPM in August 2023. The participants (residents and specialists) were asked about their personal and institutional backgrounds, access to airway management devices, awareness of recognized airway management guidelines and the importance and application of airway management techniques.

Results: Overall, 555 anesthesiologists participated in the survey (response rate 21%). The main findings were: in general, Swiss anesthesia departments are well-equipped and adhere to airway management guidelines. The guidelines of FLAVA are only known by just over 50%. The vast majority used the traditional screening tests to identify an airway that might be potentially difficult to manage. Of the respondents, 25% still adhere to the myth that a mask ventilation check is necessary before the administration of a muscle relaxant and 14% said that their institution used video laryngoscopy as the primary intubation device. More than 80% think that the expertise to perform awake fiberoptic intubation is important for their daily practice; however, 31% consider their expertise in this technique to be insufficient. In other words, there is a big safety gap.

Conclusion: Swiss anesthesia departments are well-equipped and adhere to airway management guidelines. The need for regular training to gain and maintain expertise in managing difficult airways, especially to future specialists, still prevails. Thus, developing and establishing a nationwide educational program in airway management and its continuous evaluation would be a milestone for patient safety.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
瑞士麻醉师当前气道管理实践:一项全国性调查的结果。
背景:虽然关于实施指南对气道管理结果影响的数据有限,但人们一致认为,实施和遵守指南可提高患者安全。最近,瑞士麻醉与围手术期医学学会(SSAPM)认可了the foundation Latine des Voies amacriennes (FLAVA)的指南作为瑞士气道管理的官方指南。本研究旨在确定当前瑞士气道管理的实践。目的:了解现有设备、机构间、专家与住院医师在处理气道管理方面的差异。方法:与SSAPM合作,于2023年8月向所有麻醉科主任和SSAPM会员发送一封附有德国麻醉医师气道管理在线调查问卷调查链接的求职信。参与者(住院医师和专家)被问及他们的个人和机构背景、气道管理设备的使用情况、对公认的气道管理指南的认识以及气道管理技术的重要性和应用。结果:共有555名麻醉医师参与调查,回复率21%。主要发现是:总的来说,瑞士麻醉部门设备齐全,并遵守气道管理指南。只有超过50%的人知道FLAVA的指导方针。绝大多数人使用传统的筛选测试来识别可能难以管理的气道。在受访者中,25%的人仍然坚持认为在使用肌肉松弛剂之前必须进行面罩通气检查,14%的人表示他们的机构使用视频喉镜作为主要插管装置。超过80%的人认为,在他们的日常实践中,进行清醒光纤插管的专业知识很重要;然而,31%的人认为他们在这方面的专业知识不足。换句话说,存在很大的安全缺口。结论:瑞士麻醉科设备齐全,并遵守气道管理指南。需要定期培训,以获得和保持管理困难气道的专业知识,特别是未来的专家,仍然盛行。因此,制定和建立一个全国性的气道管理教育计划及其持续评估将是患者安全的一个里程碑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Contrast-induced nephropathy: a real issue or a myth?] Operationalizing the 2025 S3 sepsis update in the ICU: three immediate auditable practice levers for safer, faster care. [Placement of central venous catheters in pediatric anesthesia : Indications, techniques and complications]. [Postdural puncture headache in a 9-year-old female patient: treatment options and trajectory]. Effective treatment of sepsis demands guidelines implementation tailored to available resources.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1