Fungal positivity seen in tertiary care hospital during COVID-19 pandemic.

Access microbiology Pub Date : 2025-01-29 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1099/acmi.0.000640.v5
Ravinder Kaur, Deepti Rawat, Ashish William, Pradeep Kumar Singh, Neelam S S Kandir, Akanksha Sharma
{"title":"Fungal positivity seen in tertiary care hospital during COVID-19 pandemic.","authors":"Ravinder Kaur, Deepti Rawat, Ashish William, Pradeep Kumar Singh, Neelam S S Kandir, Akanksha Sharma","doi":"10.1099/acmi.0.000640.v5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has been prevailing for more than a year, associated with an increased number of opportunistic invasive fungal infections in patients who have been critically ill or immunocompromised. In this retrospective study, details of various clinical specimens received from suspected patients of fungal infections were studied. Fungal cultures were positive in 64% (51 out of 79) of COVID-19-positive patients and 43% (163 out of 381) of COVID-19-negative patients during the second wave of COVID-19 in 2021. Among COVID-19-infected patients, the most commonly isolated fungi were <i>Candida</i> spp. (63%), followed by <i>Aspergillus</i> spp. (15%) and <i>Mucor</i> spp. (6%). The majority of samples that tested positive in COVID-19-infected patients were urine (17% from COVID-19-positive and 83% from COVID-19-negative patients), followed by serum (tested for <i>Aspergillus</i> galactomannan). <i>Candida</i> isolation was observed in 27% (21/79) of urine samples and 15% (12/79) of respiratory samples [bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), tracheal aspirate, and sputum] from COVID-19-positive patients. <i>Rhizopus arrhizus</i> and <i>Rhizopus homothallicus</i> were isolated from nasal and tissue samples in 6% of COVID-19-positive patients. There was an overall increase in fungal co-isolations during the COVID-19 pandemic (64% in COVID-19-positive and 43% in COVID-19-negative patients), which is a matter of great concern. The correlation of clinical symptomatology and laboratory isolation is important for the diagnosis and effective management of these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":94366,"journal":{"name":"Access microbiology","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11777003/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Access microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1099/acmi.0.000640.v5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has been prevailing for more than a year, associated with an increased number of opportunistic invasive fungal infections in patients who have been critically ill or immunocompromised. In this retrospective study, details of various clinical specimens received from suspected patients of fungal infections were studied. Fungal cultures were positive in 64% (51 out of 79) of COVID-19-positive patients and 43% (163 out of 381) of COVID-19-negative patients during the second wave of COVID-19 in 2021. Among COVID-19-infected patients, the most commonly isolated fungi were Candida spp. (63%), followed by Aspergillus spp. (15%) and Mucor spp. (6%). The majority of samples that tested positive in COVID-19-infected patients were urine (17% from COVID-19-positive and 83% from COVID-19-negative patients), followed by serum (tested for Aspergillus galactomannan). Candida isolation was observed in 27% (21/79) of urine samples and 15% (12/79) of respiratory samples [bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), tracheal aspirate, and sputum] from COVID-19-positive patients. Rhizopus arrhizus and Rhizopus homothallicus were isolated from nasal and tissue samples in 6% of COVID-19-positive patients. There was an overall increase in fungal co-isolations during the COVID-19 pandemic (64% in COVID-19-positive and 43% in COVID-19-negative patients), which is a matter of great concern. The correlation of clinical symptomatology and laboratory isolation is important for the diagnosis and effective management of these patients.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19大流行期间三级保健医院的真菌阳性。
2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行已持续一年多,与危重患者或免疫功能低下患者机会性侵袭性真菌感染数量增加有关。在这项回顾性研究中,我们对疑似真菌感染患者的各种临床标本进行了详细的研究。在2021年第二波COVID-19期间,64%(79人中51人)的COVID-19阳性患者和43%(381人中163人)的COVID-19阴性患者的真菌培养呈阳性。在covid -19感染患者中,最常见的真菌是念珠菌(63%),其次是曲霉(15%)和毛霉(6%)。在covid -19感染患者中检测阳性的大多数样本是尿液(来自covid -19阳性患者的17%和来自covid -19阴性患者的83%),其次是血清(检测半乳甘露聚糖曲霉)。2019冠状病毒感染阳性患者27%(21/79)的尿液样本和15%(12/79)的呼吸道样本[支气管肺泡灌洗(BAL)、气管抽吸和痰液]中检出念珠菌。从6%的新冠病毒阳性患者鼻腔和组织样本中分离到蒿根霉和同型根霉。在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,真菌共分离总体增加(在COVID-19阳性患者中为64%,在COVID-19阴性患者中为43%),这是一个非常值得关注的问题。临床症状与实验室隔离的相关性对这些患者的诊断和有效治疗具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Diversity and clinical correlations of SARS-CoV-2 variant during the introduction of the Delta variant in Guatemala. Phylogenetic insights derived from six Xanthomonas draft genome sequences associated with bacterial spot disease of tomato and pepper in Turkey. Assessing sequencing-based pathogen surveillance of a recreational swimming area in Oslo, Norway. Identification of pandemic clade-specific genetic marker with genomic insight into Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Human cytomegalovirus strain-specific differences in protein expression of type I IFN pathway proteins do not impact virus replication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1