General practice registrar evaluation of long COVID in patients presenting with fatigue.

David Wilkins, Amanda Tapley, Jason Dizon, Elizabeth Holliday, Andrew Davey, Alison Fielding, Dominica Moad, Mieke van Driel, Anna Ralston, Katie Fisher, Parker Magin, Nigel Stocks
{"title":"General practice registrar evaluation of long COVID in patients presenting with fatigue.","authors":"David Wilkins, Amanda Tapley, Jason Dizon, Elizabeth Holliday, Andrew Davey, Alison Fielding, Dominica Moad, Mieke van Driel, Anna Ralston, Katie Fisher, Parker Magin, Nigel Stocks","doi":"10.1071/PY24163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background Long COVID is a new and prevalent condition defined by persistent symptoms following acute COVID-19 infection. While increasing resources are being directed to management, there is little evidence on how general practitioners (GPs) have changed their assessment and differential diagnosis of patients with potential long COVID symptoms including fatigue. This study aimed to examine how often GP registrars consider long COVID in patients presenting with fatigue, how often they think long COVID might be the cause for fatigue, and patient, registrar, practice, and consultation factors associated with these outcomes. Methods Data were collected through Registrar Clinical Encounters in Training (ReCEnT), an ongoing inception cohort study of GP registrars' in-consultation experiences, during two collection rounds in 2022-2023. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the relationship between predictor variables and outcomes. Results A total of 969 registrars recorded 3193 consultations where fatigue was a symptom. Registrars reported considering long COVID as a differential diagnosis in 2563 encounters (80%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 79-82%). Of these, registrars thought long COVID was the likely cause for fatigue in 465 encounters (18%, 95% CI 17-20%). While no patient variables were significantly associated with either outcome, multivariable associations included telehealth consultations having greater odds of both outcomes and Australian-trained registrars having lesser odds of considering long COVID likely. Conclusions Registrars report usually considering long COVID as a differential for fatigue and frequently considering it a likely diagnosis. Telehealth usage was significantly associated with both outcomes. Future work should explore GPs' diagnostic approaches to other potential long COVID symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":93892,"journal":{"name":"Australian journal of primary health","volume":"31 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian journal of primary health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/PY24163","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Long COVID is a new and prevalent condition defined by persistent symptoms following acute COVID-19 infection. While increasing resources are being directed to management, there is little evidence on how general practitioners (GPs) have changed their assessment and differential diagnosis of patients with potential long COVID symptoms including fatigue. This study aimed to examine how often GP registrars consider long COVID in patients presenting with fatigue, how often they think long COVID might be the cause for fatigue, and patient, registrar, practice, and consultation factors associated with these outcomes. Methods Data were collected through Registrar Clinical Encounters in Training (ReCEnT), an ongoing inception cohort study of GP registrars' in-consultation experiences, during two collection rounds in 2022-2023. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the relationship between predictor variables and outcomes. Results A total of 969 registrars recorded 3193 consultations where fatigue was a symptom. Registrars reported considering long COVID as a differential diagnosis in 2563 encounters (80%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 79-82%). Of these, registrars thought long COVID was the likely cause for fatigue in 465 encounters (18%, 95% CI 17-20%). While no patient variables were significantly associated with either outcome, multivariable associations included telehealth consultations having greater odds of both outcomes and Australian-trained registrars having lesser odds of considering long COVID likely. Conclusions Registrars report usually considering long COVID as a differential for fatigue and frequently considering it a likely diagnosis. Telehealth usage was significantly associated with both outcomes. Future work should explore GPs' diagnostic approaches to other potential long COVID symptoms.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Exploring oral health challenges and integration strategies in opioid treatment programs: perspectives from clinicians and clients. Exploring the associative relationship between general practice engagement and hospitalisation in older carers to potentially reduce hospital burden. Culturally safe physiotherapy care: how this looks and feels for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. Implementation of a data-driven quality improvement program in primary care for patients with coronary heart disease: a mixed methods evaluation of acceptability, satisfaction, barriers and enablers. General practice registrar evaluation of long COVID in patients presenting with fatigue.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1