Z.L.R. Kaplan , N. van Leeuwen , D. van Klaveren , F. Eijkenaar , O. Visser , E.F.M. Posthuma , S. Zweegman , G. Huls , A. van Rhenen , N.M.A. Blijlevens , J.J. Cornelissen , A.A. van de Loosdrecht , J.H.F.M. Pruijt , M.D. Levin , M. Hoogendoorn , V.E.P.P. Lemmens , H.F. Lingsma , A.G. Dinmohamed
{"title":"The association between hospital volume and overall survival in adult AML patients treated with intensive chemotherapy","authors":"Z.L.R. Kaplan , N. van Leeuwen , D. van Klaveren , F. Eijkenaar , O. Visser , E.F.M. Posthuma , S. Zweegman , G. Huls , A. van Rhenen , N.M.A. Blijlevens , J.J. Cornelissen , A.A. van de Loosdrecht , J.H.F.M. Pruijt , M.D. Levin , M. Hoogendoorn , V.E.P.P. Lemmens , H.F. Lingsma , A.G. Dinmohamed","doi":"10.1016/j.esmoop.2025.104152","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) requires specialized care, particularly when administrating intensive remission induction chemotherapy (ICT). High-volume hospitals are presumed more adept at delivering this complex treatment, resulting in better overall survival (OS) rates. Despite its potential implications for quality improvement, research on the volume–outcome relationship in ICT administration for AML is scarce. This nationwide, population-based study in the Netherlands explored the volume–outcome relationship in AML.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>Data from the Netherlands Cancer Registry on adult (≥18 years of age) ICT-treated AML patients, diagnosed between 2014 and 2018, were analyzed. Hospital volume was assessed against OS using mixed-effects Cox regression, adjusting for patient and disease characteristics (i.e. case mix), with hospital as a random effect.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Our study population consisted of a total of 1761 patients (57% male), with a median age of 61 years. The average annual number of ICT-treated patients varied across the 24 hospitals (range 1-56, median 13, and interquartile range 8-20 patients per hospital per year). Overall, an increase of 10 ICT-treated patients annually was associated with an 8% lower mortality risk [hazard ratio (HR) 0.92, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.87-0.98, <em>P</em> = 0.01]. This association was not significant at 30-day (HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.89-1.17, <em>P</em> = 0.75) and 42-day (HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.85-1.08, <em>P</em> = 0.54) OS but became apparent after 100-day OS (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.83-0.99, <em>P</em> = 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>There is a volume–outcome association within AML care. This finding could support hospital volume as a metric in AML care. However, it should be acknowledged that centralizing care is a complex process with implications for health care providers and patients. Therefore, any move toward centralization must be judiciously balanced.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11877,"journal":{"name":"ESMO Open","volume":"10 2","pages":"Article 104152"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ESMO Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2059702925000201","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) requires specialized care, particularly when administrating intensive remission induction chemotherapy (ICT). High-volume hospitals are presumed more adept at delivering this complex treatment, resulting in better overall survival (OS) rates. Despite its potential implications for quality improvement, research on the volume–outcome relationship in ICT administration for AML is scarce. This nationwide, population-based study in the Netherlands explored the volume–outcome relationship in AML.
Materials and methods
Data from the Netherlands Cancer Registry on adult (≥18 years of age) ICT-treated AML patients, diagnosed between 2014 and 2018, were analyzed. Hospital volume was assessed against OS using mixed-effects Cox regression, adjusting for patient and disease characteristics (i.e. case mix), with hospital as a random effect.
Results
Our study population consisted of a total of 1761 patients (57% male), with a median age of 61 years. The average annual number of ICT-treated patients varied across the 24 hospitals (range 1-56, median 13, and interquartile range 8-20 patients per hospital per year). Overall, an increase of 10 ICT-treated patients annually was associated with an 8% lower mortality risk [hazard ratio (HR) 0.92, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.87-0.98, P = 0.01]. This association was not significant at 30-day (HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.89-1.17, P = 0.75) and 42-day (HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.85-1.08, P = 0.54) OS but became apparent after 100-day OS (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.83-0.99, P = 0.05).
Conclusions
There is a volume–outcome association within AML care. This finding could support hospital volume as a metric in AML care. However, it should be acknowledged that centralizing care is a complex process with implications for health care providers and patients. Therefore, any move toward centralization must be judiciously balanced.
背景:急性髓性白血病(AML)需要专门的护理,特别是当给予强化缓解诱导化疗(ICT)时。据推测,大容量医院更擅长提供这种复杂的治疗,从而获得更好的总生存率。尽管它对提高质量有潜在的影响,但对“反洗钱”的信息通信技术管理的数量-结果关系的研究很少。这项在荷兰进行的全国性、基于人群的研究探讨了AML的数量-结果关系。材料和方法:对2014年至2018年间诊断的成人(≥18岁)ict治疗AML患者的荷兰癌症登记处数据进行分析。采用混合效应Cox回归,调整患者和疾病特征(即病例组合),将医院作为随机效应,根据OS评估医院容量。结果:我们的研究人群共包括1761例患者(57%为男性),中位年龄为61岁。24家医院每年接受信息通信技术治疗的患者平均人数各不相同(每家医院每年接受信息通信技术治疗的患者范围为1-56人,中位数为13人,四分位数范围为8-20人)。总体而言,每年增加10例ict治疗患者与死亡风险降低8%相关[危险比(HR) 0.92, 95%可信区间(CI) 0.87-0.98, P = 0.01]。这种关联在30天(HR 1.02, 95% CI 0.89-1.17, P = 0.75)和42天(HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.85-1.08, P = 0.54)时不显著,但在100天后变得明显(HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.83-0.99, P = 0.05)。结论:AML治疗中存在容量-结果的关联。这一发现可以支持医院容量作为AML护理的指标。然而,应该承认,集中护理是一个复杂的过程,对卫生保健提供者和患者都有影响。因此,任何走向中心化的举措都必须审慎平衡。
期刊介绍:
ESMO Open is the online-only, open access journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO). It is a peer-reviewed publication dedicated to sharing high-quality medical research and educational materials from various fields of oncology. The journal specifically focuses on showcasing innovative clinical and translational cancer research.
ESMO Open aims to publish a wide range of research articles covering all aspects of oncology, including experimental studies, translational research, diagnostic advancements, and therapeutic approaches. The content of the journal includes original research articles, insightful reviews, thought-provoking editorials, and correspondence. Moreover, the journal warmly welcomes the submission of phase I trials and meta-analyses. It also showcases reviews from significant ESMO conferences and meetings, as well as publishes important position statements on behalf of ESMO.
Overall, ESMO Open offers a platform for scientists, clinicians, and researchers in the field of oncology to share their valuable insights and contribute to advancing the understanding and treatment of cancer. The journal serves as a source of up-to-date information and fosters collaboration within the oncology community.