Quantifying the Relationship Between Clinician-Administered Measures of Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex and Oculomotor Function and Patient-Reported Outcome After Pediatric Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation Pub Date : 2025-07-01 DOI:10.1097/HTR.0000000000001021
Adrienne Crampton, Pierre Langevin, Kathryn J Schneider, Lisa Grilli, Mathilde Chevignard, Michal Katz-Leurer, Miriam H Beauchamp, Chantel Debert, Isabelle J Gagnon
{"title":"Quantifying the Relationship Between Clinician-Administered Measures of Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex and Oculomotor Function and Patient-Reported Outcome After Pediatric Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.","authors":"Adrienne Crampton, Pierre Langevin, Kathryn J Schneider, Lisa Grilli, Mathilde Chevignard, Michal Katz-Leurer, Miriam H Beauchamp, Chantel Debert, Isabelle J Gagnon","doi":"10.1097/HTR.0000000000001021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In pediatric mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI), high rates of abnormalities are observed in vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) and oculomotor (OM) function, but there is a lack of understanding of how these impairments may affect daily functioning.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the extent to which clinician-administered measures of VOR and OM function are associated with patient-reported levels of activity limitations and participation restriction in children and adolescents within 31 days post-mTBI.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional design.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary care pediatric hospital.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Participants with mTBI aged 7 to 17.99 years.</p><p><strong>Procedures: </strong>Participants were assessed on a battery of VOR and OM tests within 31 days of injury.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>The Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) and Cardiff Visual Ability Questionnaire (CVAQ) measured patient-reported dizziness and visual disability. The vestibular/ocular motor screening tool (VOMS), Head Thrust Test, computerized Dynamic Visual Acuity (DVA) Test, and video Head Impulse Test were administered to assess VOR and OM function.</p><p><strong>Analysis: </strong>Linear regression examined the associations between clinician-administered measures of VOR and OM function and patient-reported functional outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample consisted of 100 youth (54.4% female; mean age 13.92 [2.63]; mean time since injury: 18.26 [6.16] days). Associations were found between (1) DHI score and age (1.773 [0.473-3.073], P = .01), VOR symptom provocation (18.499 [11.312-25.686], P ≤ .001), and DVA (-29.433 [-59.206 to -2.60], P = .03); and (2) CVAQ score and version symptom provocation (0.796 [0.185-1.406], P = .01). High abnormal proportions (up to 56.7%) were found in VOMS performance.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The symptom provocation induced by VOR and OM tasks was associated with patient-reported dizziness and visual disability outcomes, highlighting the detrimental impact of symptoms on daily functioning.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>The findings of this study will assist clinicians when interpreting patient-reported measures of activity limitation and participation restriction.</p>","PeriodicalId":15901,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"E320-E328"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0000000000001021","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In pediatric mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI), high rates of abnormalities are observed in vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) and oculomotor (OM) function, but there is a lack of understanding of how these impairments may affect daily functioning.

Objectives: To determine the extent to which clinician-administered measures of VOR and OM function are associated with patient-reported levels of activity limitations and participation restriction in children and adolescents within 31 days post-mTBI.

Design: Cross-sectional design.

Setting: Tertiary care pediatric hospital.

Participants: Participants with mTBI aged 7 to 17.99 years.

Procedures: Participants were assessed on a battery of VOR and OM tests within 31 days of injury.

Outcome measures: The Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) and Cardiff Visual Ability Questionnaire (CVAQ) measured patient-reported dizziness and visual disability. The vestibular/ocular motor screening tool (VOMS), Head Thrust Test, computerized Dynamic Visual Acuity (DVA) Test, and video Head Impulse Test were administered to assess VOR and OM function.

Analysis: Linear regression examined the associations between clinician-administered measures of VOR and OM function and patient-reported functional outcomes.

Results: The sample consisted of 100 youth (54.4% female; mean age 13.92 [2.63]; mean time since injury: 18.26 [6.16] days). Associations were found between (1) DHI score and age (1.773 [0.473-3.073], P = .01), VOR symptom provocation (18.499 [11.312-25.686], P ≤ .001), and DVA (-29.433 [-59.206 to -2.60], P = .03); and (2) CVAQ score and version symptom provocation (0.796 [0.185-1.406], P = .01). High abnormal proportions (up to 56.7%) were found in VOMS performance.

Discussion: The symptom provocation induced by VOR and OM tasks was associated with patient-reported dizziness and visual disability outcomes, highlighting the detrimental impact of symptoms on daily functioning.

Implications: The findings of this study will assist clinicians when interpreting patient-reported measures of activity limitation and participation restriction.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
量化儿科轻度创伤性脑损伤后临床给药的前庭眼反射和动眼肌功能与患者报告预后之间的关系。
背景:在儿童轻度创伤性脑损伤(mTBI)中,前庭-眼反射(VOR)和动眼肌(OM)功能异常的发生率很高,但对这些损伤如何影响日常功能缺乏了解。目的:确定临床实施的VOR和OM功能测量与儿童和青少年mtbi后31天内患者报告的活动限制和参与限制水平的关联程度。设计:横断面设计。单位:三级儿科医院。参与者:年龄在7 - 17.99岁的mTBI患者。程序:在受伤后31天内对参与者进行一系列VOR和OM测试。结果测量:头晕障碍量表(DHI)和卡迪夫视觉能力问卷(CVAQ)测量患者报告的头晕和视觉障碍。采用前庭/眼运动筛查工具(VOMS)、头推力测试、计算机动态视力测试(DVA)和视频头脉冲测试评估VOR和OM功能。分析:线性回归检验了临床给药的VOR和OM功能测量与患者报告的功能结果之间的关系。结果:样本包括100名青年(女性54.4%;平均年龄13.92岁[2.63];平均伤后时间:18.26[6.16]天)。(1) DHI评分与年龄(1.773 [0.473 ~ 3.073],P = 0.01)、VOR症状激发(18.499 [11.312 ~ 25.686],P≤0.001)、DVA (-29.433 [-59.206 ~ -2.60], P = 0.03)存在相关性;(2) CVAQ评分与版本症状激发(0.796 [0.185-1.406],P = 0.01)。VOMS性能异常比例高,高达56.7%。讨论:VOR和OM任务引起的症状激发与患者报告的头晕和视力障碍结果相关,突出了症状对日常功能的有害影响。含义:本研究的发现将有助于临床医生解释患者报告的活动限制和参与限制的测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
153
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation is a leading, peer-reviewed resource that provides up-to-date information on the clinical management and rehabilitation of persons with traumatic brain injuries. Six issues each year aspire to the vision of “knowledge informing care” and include a wide range of articles, topical issues, commentaries and special features. It is the official journal of the Brain Injury Association of America (BIAA).
期刊最新文献
Traumatic Brain Injury, Chronic Pain, and Associations With Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors: A Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems Study. Video-Based Analysis of Suspected Concussions in Slap Fighting: Incidence and Characteristics. Purpose Renewal in Adults With Persisting Symptoms After Concussion: Results of a Non-Randomized Feasibility Trial. Post-Concussion Symptoms in Older Adults Following a Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. Performance and Physiological Response to the Buffalo Concussion Treadmill Test Can Identify Autonomic Dysfunction in the General Adult Population With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A Prospective Observational Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1