Quantifying the Relationship Between Clinician-Administered Measures of Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex and Oculomotor Function and Patient-Reported Outcome After Pediatric Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.
Adrienne Crampton, Pierre Langevin, Kathryn J Schneider, Lisa Grilli, Mathilde Chevignard, Michal Katz-Leurer, Miriam H Beauchamp, Chantel Debert, Isabelle J Gagnon
{"title":"Quantifying the Relationship Between Clinician-Administered Measures of Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex and Oculomotor Function and Patient-Reported Outcome After Pediatric Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.","authors":"Adrienne Crampton, Pierre Langevin, Kathryn J Schneider, Lisa Grilli, Mathilde Chevignard, Michal Katz-Leurer, Miriam H Beauchamp, Chantel Debert, Isabelle J Gagnon","doi":"10.1097/HTR.0000000000001021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In pediatric mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI), high rates of abnormalities are observed in vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) and oculomotor (OM) function, but there is a lack of understanding of how these impairments may affect daily functioning.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine the extent to which clinician-administered measures of VOR and OM function are associated with patient-reported levels of activity limitations and participation restriction in children and adolescents within 31 days post-mTBI.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional design.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary care pediatric hospital.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Participants with mTBI aged 7 to 17.99 years.</p><p><strong>Procedures: </strong>Participants were assessed on a battery of VOR and OM tests within 31 days of injury.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>The Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) and Cardiff Visual Ability Questionnaire (CVAQ) measured patient-reported dizziness and visual disability. The vestibular/ocular motor screening tool (VOMS), Head Thrust Test, computerized Dynamic Visual Acuity (DVA) Test, and video Head Impulse Test were administered to assess VOR and OM function.</p><p><strong>Analysis: </strong>Linear regression examined the associations between clinician-administered measures of VOR and OM function and patient-reported functional outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample consisted of 100 youth (54.4% female; mean age 13.92 [2.63]; mean time since injury: 18.26 [6.16] days). Associations were found between (1) DHI score and age (1.773 [0.473-3.073], P = .01), VOR symptom provocation (18.499 [11.312-25.686], P ≤ .001), and DVA (-29.433 [-59.206 to -2.60], P = .03); and (2) CVAQ score and version symptom provocation (0.796 [0.185-1.406], P = .01). High abnormal proportions (up to 56.7%) were found in VOMS performance.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The symptom provocation induced by VOR and OM tasks was associated with patient-reported dizziness and visual disability outcomes, highlighting the detrimental impact of symptoms on daily functioning.</p><p><strong>Implications: </strong>The findings of this study will assist clinicians when interpreting patient-reported measures of activity limitation and participation restriction.</p>","PeriodicalId":15901,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0000000000001021","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: In pediatric mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI), high rates of abnormalities are observed in vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) and oculomotor (OM) function, but there is a lack of understanding of how these impairments may affect daily functioning.
Objectives: To determine the extent to which clinician-administered measures of VOR and OM function are associated with patient-reported levels of activity limitations and participation restriction in children and adolescents within 31 days post-mTBI.
Design: Cross-sectional design.
Setting: Tertiary care pediatric hospital.
Participants: Participants with mTBI aged 7 to 17.99 years.
Procedures: Participants were assessed on a battery of VOR and OM tests within 31 days of injury.
Outcome measures: The Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) and Cardiff Visual Ability Questionnaire (CVAQ) measured patient-reported dizziness and visual disability. The vestibular/ocular motor screening tool (VOMS), Head Thrust Test, computerized Dynamic Visual Acuity (DVA) Test, and video Head Impulse Test were administered to assess VOR and OM function.
Analysis: Linear regression examined the associations between clinician-administered measures of VOR and OM function and patient-reported functional outcomes.
Results: The sample consisted of 100 youth (54.4% female; mean age 13.92 [2.63]; mean time since injury: 18.26 [6.16] days). Associations were found between (1) DHI score and age (1.773 [0.473-3.073], P = .01), VOR symptom provocation (18.499 [11.312-25.686], P ≤ .001), and DVA (-29.433 [-59.206 to -2.60], P = .03); and (2) CVAQ score and version symptom provocation (0.796 [0.185-1.406], P = .01). High abnormal proportions (up to 56.7%) were found in VOMS performance.
Discussion: The symptom provocation induced by VOR and OM tasks was associated with patient-reported dizziness and visual disability outcomes, highlighting the detrimental impact of symptoms on daily functioning.
Implications: The findings of this study will assist clinicians when interpreting patient-reported measures of activity limitation and participation restriction.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation is a leading, peer-reviewed resource that provides up-to-date information on the clinical management and rehabilitation of persons with traumatic brain injuries. Six issues each year aspire to the vision of “knowledge informing care” and include a wide range of articles, topical issues, commentaries and special features. It is the official journal of the Brain Injury Association of America (BIAA).