Alternative assessment of industrial effluent compliance: A case study of stakeholders’ perspectives in Malaysia

IF 10 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL Journal of Cleaner Production Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.144776
Zulaikha Mokhtar , Steven Kenway , Ilje Pikaar
{"title":"Alternative assessment of industrial effluent compliance: A case study of stakeholders’ perspectives in Malaysia","authors":"Zulaikha Mokhtar ,&nbsp;Steven Kenway ,&nbsp;Ilje Pikaar","doi":"10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.144776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Safe and healthy waterways are essential for environmental sustainability, making the assessment of industrial effluent discharge compliance critical. This study investigates stakeholder perspectives on alternative rating assessments for measuring industry discharge compliance, addressing the current fragmentation in stakeholder involvement in Malaysia. A survey was conducted with 519 representatives from government agencies, non-governmental organizations, industries, environmental groups, and policymakers, analyzing six compliance rating assessments: planning and administration in legal compliance, industry and community empowerment, compliance operation, system implementation, environmental risk and emergency plan, and environmental audits. The findings reveal that 78% of participants support implementing new assessments, with system implementation, legal compliance, and compliance operation being the most accepted. Financial and tax incentives were identified as highly effective in encouraging industry participation in these assessments. Challenges such as financial constraints, compliance issues, manpower shortages, and a lack of awareness were also noted. This study not only provides insights into stakeholder perspectives but also highlights a promising path for future compliance management in Malaysia and beyond.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":349,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cleaner Production","volume":"495 ","pages":"Article 144776"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cleaner Production","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095965262500126X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Safe and healthy waterways are essential for environmental sustainability, making the assessment of industrial effluent discharge compliance critical. This study investigates stakeholder perspectives on alternative rating assessments for measuring industry discharge compliance, addressing the current fragmentation in stakeholder involvement in Malaysia. A survey was conducted with 519 representatives from government agencies, non-governmental organizations, industries, environmental groups, and policymakers, analyzing six compliance rating assessments: planning and administration in legal compliance, industry and community empowerment, compliance operation, system implementation, environmental risk and emergency plan, and environmental audits. The findings reveal that 78% of participants support implementing new assessments, with system implementation, legal compliance, and compliance operation being the most accepted. Financial and tax incentives were identified as highly effective in encouraging industry participation in these assessments. Challenges such as financial constraints, compliance issues, manpower shortages, and a lack of awareness were also noted. This study not only provides insights into stakeholder perspectives but also highlights a promising path for future compliance management in Malaysia and beyond.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
工业废水合规的替代评估:马来西亚利益相关者观点的案例研究
安全和健康的水道对环境的可持续性至关重要,因此对工业废水排放合规性的评估至关重要。本研究调查了利益相关者对衡量工业排放合规的替代评级评估的观点,解决了目前马来西亚利益相关者参与的碎片化问题。对来自政府机构、非政府组织、行业、环保团体和政策制定者的519名代表进行了调查,分析了六项合规评级评估:法律合规规划和管理、行业和社区赋权、合规运营、制度实施、环境风险和应急计划、环境审计。调查结果显示,78%的参与者支持实施新的评估,其中系统实施、法律合规和合规操作最受欢迎。财政和税收奖励被认为在鼓励工业界参与这些评估方面非常有效。还指出了诸如财政限制、合规问题、人力短缺和缺乏认识等挑战。这项研究不仅提供了对利益相关者观点的见解,而且还强调了马来西亚及其他地区未来合规管理的有希望的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cleaner Production
Journal of Cleaner Production 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
9.00%
发文量
4720
审稿时长
111 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cleaner Production is an international, transdisciplinary journal that addresses and discusses theoretical and practical Cleaner Production, Environmental, and Sustainability issues. It aims to help societies become more sustainable by focusing on the concept of 'Cleaner Production', which aims at preventing waste production and increasing efficiencies in energy, water, resources, and human capital use. The journal serves as a platform for corporations, governments, education institutions, regions, and societies to engage in discussions and research related to Cleaner Production, environmental, and sustainability practices.
期刊最新文献
Effects of thin-film and wafer-based photovoltaic module transparency and spectral properties on microclimate and turnip yield in agrivoltaic systems Particle effect and interaction effect of scrap tire crumb rubber on adhesion of asphalt-aggregate interface Operationalizing scale-specific thresholds for watershed sustainability: Ecological-social-economic coupling coordination in China's Guishui River Basin Shaping social norms to promote individual response behavior in public crises: An agent-based modeling approach Uncovering drivers and mitigation synergies of global paddy CH4 and N2O emissions using a Bayesian Belief Network
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1