2843 Evaluating dementia pathway services: a Sussex-wide patients and carers’ perspective

IF 7.1 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Age and ageing Pub Date : 2025-01-30 DOI:10.1093/ageing/afae277.056
L Coleman, E Mensah, K Ali
{"title":"2843 Evaluating dementia pathway services: a Sussex-wide patients and carers’ perspective","authors":"L Coleman, E Mensah, K Ali","doi":"10.1093/ageing/afae277.056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction As the prevalence of dementia continues to increase across the UK, understanding the lived experience of patients and carers affected by dementia becomes paramount. There is an established dementia pathway in Sussex for people living with dementia (PLWD) and their carers. To improve care and inform future commissioning priorities, the Brighton and Hove Health Watch (BHHW- a community interest company) surveyed the opinions of a group of PLWD and their carers around initial diagnosis and subsequent support. Methods PLWD and their carers receiving social support and willing to provide feedback were included in this survey. Using a topic guide, BHHW volunteers conducted a telephone interview with this group exploring their experience with their general practitioner (GP), and the memory assessment service (MAS) in relation to diagnosis, and post-diagnosis support. Transcribed interviews were analysed using qualitative thematic analysis (inductively and deductively) using Braun and Clarke’s method. Results Forty-five participants were interviewed, 37 carers and 6 PLWD (average age 78.2 range 64–95 years) between December 2022 and May 2023. Thirty-nine participants (86%) were of white-British ethnicity. Participants reported a range of different experiences with no consistent pattern by age, gender or location. Participants were generally satisfied with the initial GP care they received. The waiting time to access MAS was six weeks on average, an acceptable timeframe for the group. Some participants reported waiting as long as two years since the initial GP consultation before a dementia diagnosis was eventually made. Participants were generally satisfied by the thorough MAS review. Most participants felt that the information material they immediately received after dementia diagnosis was complex and overwhelming. Social support offered post-diagnosis was commendable. Conclusion The lived experience of PLWD and their carers in Sussex was generally positive. However, a tailored approach to post-diagnosis information provision is required.","PeriodicalId":7682,"journal":{"name":"Age and ageing","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Age and ageing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afae277.056","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction As the prevalence of dementia continues to increase across the UK, understanding the lived experience of patients and carers affected by dementia becomes paramount. There is an established dementia pathway in Sussex for people living with dementia (PLWD) and their carers. To improve care and inform future commissioning priorities, the Brighton and Hove Health Watch (BHHW- a community interest company) surveyed the opinions of a group of PLWD and their carers around initial diagnosis and subsequent support. Methods PLWD and their carers receiving social support and willing to provide feedback were included in this survey. Using a topic guide, BHHW volunteers conducted a telephone interview with this group exploring their experience with their general practitioner (GP), and the memory assessment service (MAS) in relation to diagnosis, and post-diagnosis support. Transcribed interviews were analysed using qualitative thematic analysis (inductively and deductively) using Braun and Clarke’s method. Results Forty-five participants were interviewed, 37 carers and 6 PLWD (average age 78.2 range 64–95 years) between December 2022 and May 2023. Thirty-nine participants (86%) were of white-British ethnicity. Participants reported a range of different experiences with no consistent pattern by age, gender or location. Participants were generally satisfied with the initial GP care they received. The waiting time to access MAS was six weeks on average, an acceptable timeframe for the group. Some participants reported waiting as long as two years since the initial GP consultation before a dementia diagnosis was eventually made. Participants were generally satisfied by the thorough MAS review. Most participants felt that the information material they immediately received after dementia diagnosis was complex and overwhelming. Social support offered post-diagnosis was commendable. Conclusion The lived experience of PLWD and their carers in Sussex was generally positive. However, a tailored approach to post-diagnosis information provision is required.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2843评估痴呆路径服务:苏塞克斯郡患者和护理人员的视角
随着英国痴呆症的患病率不断增加,了解痴呆症患者和护理人员的生活经历变得至关重要。在苏塞克斯郡,为痴呆症患者及其护理人员建立了一条痴呆症途径。为了改善护理并告知未来的调试优先事项,布莱顿和霍夫健康观察(BHHW-一家社区利益公司)调查了一组PLWD及其护理人员对初步诊断和后续支持的意见。方法对接受社会支持并愿意提供反馈的护理人员进行问卷调查。BHHW志愿者使用主题指南对这组人进行了电话访谈,探讨他们与全科医生(GP)以及与诊断和诊断后支持相关的记忆评估服务(MAS)的经验。使用Braun和Clarke的方法,使用定性主题分析(归纳和演绎)对记录的访谈进行分析。结果在2022年12月至2023年5月期间,对45名参与者进行了访谈,其中37名护理人员和6名老年痴呆症患者(平均年龄78.2岁,64-95岁)。39名参与者(86%)是英国白人。参与者报告了一系列不同的经历,在年龄、性别或地点上没有一致的模式。参与者普遍对他们接受的初始全科医生护理感到满意。进入MAS的等待时间平均为六周,这是该组可以接受的时间框架。一些参与者报告说,从最初的全科医生咨询到最终做出痴呆症诊断,他们等了长达两年的时间。与会者普遍对金管局的全面检讨感到满意。大多数参与者认为,他们在痴呆症诊断后立即收到的信息材料是复杂和压倒性的。诊断后提供的社会支持值得赞扬。结论苏塞克斯郡PLWD患者及其护理人员的生活经历总体上是积极的。然而,需要一种量身定制的诊断后信息提供方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Age and ageing
Age and ageing 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
6.00%
发文量
796
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Age and Ageing is an international journal publishing refereed original articles and commissioned reviews on geriatric medicine and gerontology. Its range includes research on ageing and clinical, epidemiological, and psychological aspects of later life.
期刊最新文献
Seasonal and spatial considerations in assessing home environment characteristics, indoor dust microbiota and frailty New horizons: disrupted brain energy metabolism as a driver of delirium Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment On A New Specialist Geriatric Ward In A Post-Acute Rehabilitation Setting: A Retrospective Review Barriers and Facilitators to Hospital Physicians’ Recognition of Prescribing Cascades: A Qualitative Interview Study A Two Year Retrospective Review Of Patients 65-Years And Older Attending Genitourinary Clinic In A Tertiary Centre
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1