2663 Estimating the effect of frailty on long term survival following emergency laparotomy

IF 6 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Age and ageing Pub Date : 2025-01-30 DOI:10.1093/ageing/afae277.108
A Price, L Pearce, J Griffiths, J Smith, L Tomkow, P Martin
{"title":"2663 Estimating the effect of frailty on long term survival following emergency laparotomy","authors":"A Price, L Pearce, J Griffiths, J Smith, L Tomkow, P Martin","doi":"10.1093/ageing/afae277.108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Around 30,000 emergency laparotomies are performed each year across the United Kingdom. Over half are in people aged 65 years or above, with a third of this group living with frailty. The association between frailty and 90-day mortality following surgery is well documented, but longer-term mortality risk has been less extensively studied, despite clear implications for person-centred care. This study aimed to estimate the influence of frailty on longer-term mortality (> 90 days) following emergency laparotomy. Methods A retrospective analysis of National Emergency Laparotomy Audit (NELA) data was undertaken, including records entered between 01/12/18 and 30/11/20. Baseline patient characteristics including Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) are routinely collected within NELA. Data are linked via NHS Digital with Office for National Statistics mortality data. A multivariate analysis was undertaken using a Cox proportional hazards model with hospital-level random effects. Potential confounders were identified via a directed acyclic graph and included in the model as covariates. Results 23,290 patients remained alive at 90 days post-surgery and were therefore included in the analysis. After adjusting for other covariates, increasing frailty was associated with an increased risk of longer-term mortality. Compared with CFS 1–3, adjusted HR were 1.86 (95% CI 1.68–2.05) for CFS 4, 2.23 (95% CI 2.03–2.45) for CFS 5, 3.26 (95% CI 2.99–3.57) for CFS 6, 4.53 (95% CI 3.97 (95% CI 5.17) for CFS 7, 5.80 (95% CI 4.44–7.57) for CFS 8 and 5.36 (95% CI 4.06–7.08) for CFS 9. Conclusion Older people living with frailty remain at increased risk of death beyond 90 days following emergency laparotomy. This information should be incorporated into shared decision-making, enabling patients to make informed choices about their care. Future work must explore how outcomes for this group might be improved through targeted post-operative support.","PeriodicalId":7682,"journal":{"name":"Age and ageing","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Age and ageing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afae277.108","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction Around 30,000 emergency laparotomies are performed each year across the United Kingdom. Over half are in people aged 65 years or above, with a third of this group living with frailty. The association between frailty and 90-day mortality following surgery is well documented, but longer-term mortality risk has been less extensively studied, despite clear implications for person-centred care. This study aimed to estimate the influence of frailty on longer-term mortality (> 90 days) following emergency laparotomy. Methods A retrospective analysis of National Emergency Laparotomy Audit (NELA) data was undertaken, including records entered between 01/12/18 and 30/11/20. Baseline patient characteristics including Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) are routinely collected within NELA. Data are linked via NHS Digital with Office for National Statistics mortality data. A multivariate analysis was undertaken using a Cox proportional hazards model with hospital-level random effects. Potential confounders were identified via a directed acyclic graph and included in the model as covariates. Results 23,290 patients remained alive at 90 days post-surgery and were therefore included in the analysis. After adjusting for other covariates, increasing frailty was associated with an increased risk of longer-term mortality. Compared with CFS 1–3, adjusted HR were 1.86 (95% CI 1.68–2.05) for CFS 4, 2.23 (95% CI 2.03–2.45) for CFS 5, 3.26 (95% CI 2.99–3.57) for CFS 6, 4.53 (95% CI 3.97 (95% CI 5.17) for CFS 7, 5.80 (95% CI 4.44–7.57) for CFS 8 and 5.36 (95% CI 4.06–7.08) for CFS 9. Conclusion Older people living with frailty remain at increased risk of death beyond 90 days following emergency laparotomy. This information should be incorporated into shared decision-making, enabling patients to make informed choices about their care. Future work must explore how outcomes for this group might be improved through targeted post-operative support.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Age and ageing
Age and ageing 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
6.00%
发文量
796
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Age and Ageing is an international journal publishing refereed original articles and commissioned reviews on geriatric medicine and gerontology. Its range includes research on ageing and clinical, epidemiological, and psychological aspects of later life.
期刊最新文献
Process evaluation of an intervention to reduce sleep problems in people living with dementia in nursing homes: a mixed-methods study Geriatric evaluation and management inpatients spend little time participating in physically, cognitively or socially meaningful activity: a time–motion analysis Can ambulatory blood pressure biomarkers predict future falls amongst older people? Risk of new-onset dementia following COVID-19 infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis Common occurrence of atrophic gastritis in an ageing non-hospitalised population: an autopsy study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1