2846 How can simulation training be used to teach skills in human factors (HF)?

IF 7.1 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Age and ageing Pub Date : 2025-01-30 DOI:10.1093/ageing/afae277.087
EK Matharu, J Jegard, S Hague, B Roj, M Kaneshamoorthy
{"title":"2846 How can simulation training be used to teach skills in human factors (HF)?","authors":"EK Matharu, J Jegard, S Hague, B Roj, M Kaneshamoorthy","doi":"10.1093/ageing/afae277.087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Simulation training is a valuable resource to teach clinical skills and mimic emergency settings. Human factors (HF) are non-technical skills that are affected by human attitudes and behaviours. Weaknesses in human factors can cause fatal medical errors. We wanted to assess if simulation can be used as a tool to improve these. We conducted two simulation training days for medical higher specialty trainees (HST) focusing on HF. Methods 20 HSTs participated in 10 simulated scenarios. Scenarios involved using a high-fidelity manikin and actors. The scenarios were a mixture of long and short cases, including both clinical and non-clinical scenarios with a HF focus. Pre- and post-session questionnaires were used to rate confidence levels in a series of specific HF. A 10-point Likert scale was used. Results The majority of participants had a firm understanding of the importance of human factors in healthcare, especially the importance of teamwork, compassion, communication and situational awareness. 70% of participants felt that human factors training may not be adequately considered in current training pathways due to limited formal exposure, limited time, and its importance being underestimated. There was an increase in confidence in: managing disagreements (31%), negative emotions (38%), prioritisation (28%), delegation (23%), teamwork (34%) and leadership skills (30%), dealing with uncertainty (29%), challenging hierarchy (27%), anticipation (31%). 100% felt simulation training helped to develop their attainment of human factor skills. Conclusion This form of simulation training was successful in improving confidence and understanding of human factors in healthcare and showcased the value of using high-fidelity training to realistically recreate the clinical environment. Going forward, this type of teaching could be integrated within the specialty training curriculum to formally improve skills in human factors and therefore improve patient outcomes and relationships between team members, thus contributing to a more positive working environment.","PeriodicalId":7682,"journal":{"name":"Age and ageing","volume":"55 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Age and ageing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afae277.087","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction Simulation training is a valuable resource to teach clinical skills and mimic emergency settings. Human factors (HF) are non-technical skills that are affected by human attitudes and behaviours. Weaknesses in human factors can cause fatal medical errors. We wanted to assess if simulation can be used as a tool to improve these. We conducted two simulation training days for medical higher specialty trainees (HST) focusing on HF. Methods 20 HSTs participated in 10 simulated scenarios. Scenarios involved using a high-fidelity manikin and actors. The scenarios were a mixture of long and short cases, including both clinical and non-clinical scenarios with a HF focus. Pre- and post-session questionnaires were used to rate confidence levels in a series of specific HF. A 10-point Likert scale was used. Results The majority of participants had a firm understanding of the importance of human factors in healthcare, especially the importance of teamwork, compassion, communication and situational awareness. 70% of participants felt that human factors training may not be adequately considered in current training pathways due to limited formal exposure, limited time, and its importance being underestimated. There was an increase in confidence in: managing disagreements (31%), negative emotions (38%), prioritisation (28%), delegation (23%), teamwork (34%) and leadership skills (30%), dealing with uncertainty (29%), challenging hierarchy (27%), anticipation (31%). 100% felt simulation training helped to develop their attainment of human factor skills. Conclusion This form of simulation training was successful in improving confidence and understanding of human factors in healthcare and showcased the value of using high-fidelity training to realistically recreate the clinical environment. Going forward, this type of teaching could be integrated within the specialty training curriculum to formally improve skills in human factors and therefore improve patient outcomes and relationships between team members, thus contributing to a more positive working environment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
如何利用模拟训练来教授人为因素方面的技能?
模拟训练是教授临床技能和模拟紧急情况的宝贵资源。人为因素(HF)是受人的态度和行为影响的非技术技能。人为因素的弱点可能导致致命的医疗差错。我们想评估模拟是否可以作为一种工具来改善这些。以心脑血管病为重点,开展了为期两天的医学高等专科学员模拟培训。方法20名HSTs参与10个模拟场景。场景涉及使用高保真的人体模型和演员。这些情况是长期和短期病例的混合,包括以心衰为焦点的临床和非临床情况。使用会前和会后问卷对一系列特定心衰的置信水平进行评分。采用10分李克特量表。结果大多数参与者对人的因素在医疗保健中的重要性有明确的认识,特别是团队合作、同情心、沟通和情境意识的重要性。70%的参与者认为,由于正式接触有限,时间有限,其重要性被低估,目前的培训途径可能没有充分考虑人为因素培训。对以下方面的信心有所增加:管理分歧(31%)、负面情绪(38%)、优先排序(28%)、授权(23%)、团队合作(34%)和领导技能(30%)、应对不确定性(29%)、挑战层级(27%)、预期(31%)。100%的人认为模拟训练有助于培养他们的人为因素技能。结论这种形式的模拟训练成功地提高了对医疗保健中人为因素的信心和理解,展示了使用高保真度训练真实再现临床环境的价值。展望未来,这种类型的教学可以整合到专业培训课程中,以正式提高人为因素的技能,从而改善患者的治疗效果和团队成员之间的关系,从而为更积极的工作环境做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Age and ageing
Age and ageing 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
6.00%
发文量
796
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Age and Ageing is an international journal publishing refereed original articles and commissioned reviews on geriatric medicine and gerontology. Its range includes research on ageing and clinical, epidemiological, and psychological aspects of later life.
期刊最新文献
Adverse childhood experiences and sarcopenia: a prospective study embedded in the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging. Correction to: Home-based extended rehabilitation for older people with frailty (HERO): a randomised controlled trial. Editor's view-the pathophysiology of delirium. Correction to: The World Health Organization ageism towards older persons scale: preliminary validation of a novel measure of ageist stereotypes, prejudices, and discrimination in four different countries. Improving screening in the WHO ICOPE strategy: lessons from risk profiles for major adverse health outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1