2771 Improving collateral history taking in the geriatric population

IF 7.1 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Age and ageing Pub Date : 2025-01-30 DOI:10.1093/ageing/afae277.052
E Swain, K Ramsay
{"title":"2771 Improving collateral history taking in the geriatric population","authors":"E Swain, K Ramsay","doi":"10.1093/ageing/afae277.052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction The geriatric population has a high incidence of dementia, delirium and frailty meaning often these patients cannot give comprehensive histories themselves. We are left with missing pieces of the puzzle; we might not know their ‘normal’ and frequently ask: ‘Are they always like this?’ A collateral history becomes a valuable tool, contributing to a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment and assisting the whole MDT to make informed decisions for patient-centred care. The primary aim of this project was to improve the quality of collateral histories taken for patients admitted to the geriatric wards, with content measured against 8 domains. A secondary aim was to encourage timely collateral histories within 48 hours of admission to the ward. Method Using PDSA methodology, collateral histories were analysed before and after implementation of a poster and teaching session. Results At baseline each domain was covered a mean of 40.5% of the time (range 9%—81%). Following intervention this increased by 22% to 62.5% (range 18%—89%), demonstrating a significant improvement (paired t-test, P < 0.05). It was already common practice to take collateral histories within 48 hours of admission to the ward (91%) which was sustained post-intervention (88%). Conclusion Use of a poster as a prompt, and delivering teaching, led to more thorough collateral histories. This suggests two barriers are knowing what to ask and perceived importance, elements which could be integrated into early postgraduate education. The impact on patient care has the potential to be significant and multidimensional but further work would be needed to understand this.","PeriodicalId":7682,"journal":{"name":"Age and ageing","volume":"63 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Age and ageing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afae277.052","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction The geriatric population has a high incidence of dementia, delirium and frailty meaning often these patients cannot give comprehensive histories themselves. We are left with missing pieces of the puzzle; we might not know their ‘normal’ and frequently ask: ‘Are they always like this?’ A collateral history becomes a valuable tool, contributing to a Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment and assisting the whole MDT to make informed decisions for patient-centred care. The primary aim of this project was to improve the quality of collateral histories taken for patients admitted to the geriatric wards, with content measured against 8 domains. A secondary aim was to encourage timely collateral histories within 48 hours of admission to the ward. Method Using PDSA methodology, collateral histories were analysed before and after implementation of a poster and teaching session. Results At baseline each domain was covered a mean of 40.5% of the time (range 9%—81%). Following intervention this increased by 22% to 62.5% (range 18%—89%), demonstrating a significant improvement (paired t-test, P < 0.05). It was already common practice to take collateral histories within 48 hours of admission to the ward (91%) which was sustained post-intervention (88%). Conclusion Use of a poster as a prompt, and delivering teaching, led to more thorough collateral histories. This suggests two barriers are knowing what to ask and perceived importance, elements which could be integrated into early postgraduate education. The impact on patient care has the potential to be significant and multidimensional but further work would be needed to understand this.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2771改善老年人群侧枝病史采集
老年人群中痴呆、谵妄和虚弱的发病率很高,这意味着这些患者往往不能提供全面的病史。我们只剩下拼图中缺失的部分;我们可能不知道他们的“正常”,经常问:“他们总是这样吗?”“附带病史成为一个有价值的工具,有助于全面的老年评估,并协助整个MDT做出明智的决定,以患者为中心的护理。”该项目的主要目的是提高老年病房收治患者侧枝病史的质量,并对8个领域的内容进行测量。第二个目的是鼓励患者在入院48小时内及时记录旁发病史。方法采用PDSA方法,对实施海报和教学前后的相关病史进行分析。结果在基线时,每个域平均覆盖40.5%的时间(范围9%-81%)。干预后,这一比例增加了22%至62.5%(范围18%-89%),显示出显著的改善(配对t检验,P <;0.05)。通常的做法是在入院48小时内(91%)记录旁发病史,干预后(88%)仍在继续。使用海报作为提示,并提供教学,导致更全面的附带历史。这表明两个障碍是知道该问什么和感知到的重要性,这两个因素可以整合到早期研究生教育中。对病人护理的影响可能是重大的和多方面的,但需要进一步的工作来理解这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Age and ageing
Age and ageing 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
6.00%
发文量
796
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Age and Ageing is an international journal publishing refereed original articles and commissioned reviews on geriatric medicine and gerontology. Its range includes research on ageing and clinical, epidemiological, and psychological aspects of later life.
期刊最新文献
Seasonal and spatial considerations in assessing home environment characteristics, indoor dust microbiota and frailty New horizons: disrupted brain energy metabolism as a driver of delirium Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment On A New Specialist Geriatric Ward In A Post-Acute Rehabilitation Setting: A Retrospective Review Barriers and Facilitators to Hospital Physicians’ Recognition of Prescribing Cascades: A Qualitative Interview Study A Two Year Retrospective Review Of Patients 65-Years And Older Attending Genitourinary Clinic In A Tertiary Centre
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1