Predicting abatacept retention using machine learning

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 Medicine Arthritis Research & Therapy Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1186/s13075-025-03484-0
Rieke Alten, Claire Behar, Pierre Merckaert, Ebenezer Afari, Virginie Vannier-Moreau, Anael Ohayon, Sean E. Connolly, Aurélie Najm, Pierre-Antoine Juge, Gengyuan Liu, Angshu Rai, Yedid Elbez, Karissa Lozenski
{"title":"Predicting abatacept retention using machine learning","authors":"Rieke Alten, Claire Behar, Pierre Merckaert, Ebenezer Afari, Virginie Vannier-Moreau, Anael Ohayon, Sean E. Connolly, Aurélie Najm, Pierre-Antoine Juge, Gengyuan Liu, Angshu Rai, Yedid Elbez, Karissa Lozenski","doi":"10.1186/s13075-025-03484-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The incorporation of machine learning is becoming more prevalent in the clinical setting. By predicting clinical outcomes, machine learning can provide clinicians with a valuable tool for refining precision medicine approaches and improving treatment outcomes. This was a post hoc analysis of pooled patient-level data from the global, real-world ACTION and ASCORE trials in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) initiating abatacept. Patient demographic and disease characteristics were input across 10 machine learning models used to predict 12-month treatment retention. Retention was defined as treatment for > 365 days or ≤ 365 days in patients who achieved remission or major clinical response (based on European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology response criteria). The pooled dataset was split into a training/validation cohort for model development and a test cohort for an unbiased evaluation of performance. SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) values determined the level of importance and directionality for key patient features predicting abatacept retention. The pooled ACTION and ASCORE dataset included 5320 patients with RA (mean [standard deviation] age 57.7 [12.7] years; 79% female). The 12-month abatacept retention rate was 61% (n = 3236) with a discontinuation rate of 39% (n = 2037). In the training set (n = 4218), the gradient-boosting classifier model demonstrated the best performance (testing accuracy: 62%). This model had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (95% confidence interval) of 0.620 (0.586, 0.653) and F1 score of 0.659 (0.625, 0.689) in the test set of patients (n = 1055). Using this model, the five most important variables predicting 12-month abatacept retention were low body mass index (BMI), low American College of Rheumatology functional status class, anti-citrullinated protein antibody (ACPA) positivity, low Patient Global Assessment, and younger age. The gradient-boosting classifier model identified key patient features predictive of abatacept retention from this large, real-world study population. The SHAP values conveyed the directionality and importance of BMI, functional status, ACPA serostatus, Patient Global Assessment, and age for abatacept retention. Findings are consistent with previous observations and help validate the machine learning approach for predictive modelling in RA treatment, and may help inform clinical decision making. NCT02109666 (ACTION), NCT02090556 (ASCORE).","PeriodicalId":8419,"journal":{"name":"Arthritis Research & Therapy","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthritis Research & Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-025-03484-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The incorporation of machine learning is becoming more prevalent in the clinical setting. By predicting clinical outcomes, machine learning can provide clinicians with a valuable tool for refining precision medicine approaches and improving treatment outcomes. This was a post hoc analysis of pooled patient-level data from the global, real-world ACTION and ASCORE trials in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) initiating abatacept. Patient demographic and disease characteristics were input across 10 machine learning models used to predict 12-month treatment retention. Retention was defined as treatment for > 365 days or ≤ 365 days in patients who achieved remission or major clinical response (based on European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology response criteria). The pooled dataset was split into a training/validation cohort for model development and a test cohort for an unbiased evaluation of performance. SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) values determined the level of importance and directionality for key patient features predicting abatacept retention. The pooled ACTION and ASCORE dataset included 5320 patients with RA (mean [standard deviation] age 57.7 [12.7] years; 79% female). The 12-month abatacept retention rate was 61% (n = 3236) with a discontinuation rate of 39% (n = 2037). In the training set (n = 4218), the gradient-boosting classifier model demonstrated the best performance (testing accuracy: 62%). This model had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (95% confidence interval) of 0.620 (0.586, 0.653) and F1 score of 0.659 (0.625, 0.689) in the test set of patients (n = 1055). Using this model, the five most important variables predicting 12-month abatacept retention were low body mass index (BMI), low American College of Rheumatology functional status class, anti-citrullinated protein antibody (ACPA) positivity, low Patient Global Assessment, and younger age. The gradient-boosting classifier model identified key patient features predictive of abatacept retention from this large, real-world study population. The SHAP values conveyed the directionality and importance of BMI, functional status, ACPA serostatus, Patient Global Assessment, and age for abatacept retention. Findings are consistent with previous observations and help validate the machine learning approach for predictive modelling in RA treatment, and may help inform clinical decision making. NCT02109666 (ACTION), NCT02090556 (ASCORE).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
2.00%
发文量
261
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Established in 1999, Arthritis Research and Therapy is an international, open access, peer-reviewed journal, publishing original articles in the area of musculoskeletal research and therapy as well as, reviews, commentaries and reports. A major focus of the journal is on the immunologic processes leading to inflammation, damage and repair as they relate to autoimmune rheumatic and musculoskeletal conditions, and which inform the translation of this knowledge into advances in clinical care. Original basic, translational and clinical research is considered for publication along with results of early and late phase therapeutic trials, especially as they pertain to the underpinning science that informs clinical observations in interventional studies.
期刊最新文献
Integrated analysis of dermatomyositis reveals heterogeneous immune infiltration and interstitial lung disease-associated endotype Blood molecular subtypes to guide precision treatment strategies in systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis Associations between age, red cell distribution width and 180-day and 1-year mortality in giant cell arteritis patients: mediation analyses and machine learning in a cohort study The rational use of glucocorticoids may reduce the risk of readmission in menopausal women with knee osteoarthritis: results from a five-year longitudinal study Upadacitinib in active non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis: 2-year data from the phase 3 SELECT-AXIS 2 study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1