A Comparative Analysis of Universal and Sentinel Surveillance Data for COVID-19: Insights from Argentina, Chile, and Mexico (2020–2022)

Lidia Redondo-Bravo, Kinda Zureick, Carla Jimena Voto, Xaviera Molina Avendaño, Laura Flores-Cisneros, Ashley Fowlkes, Luciana Eva Iummato, Carlos Maria Giovacchini, Maria Fernanda Olivares Barraza, Paula Rodriguez Ferrari, Rosaura Gutiérrez-Vargas, Christian Arturo Zaragoza-Jiménez, Gabriel García-Rodríguez, Hugo López-Gatell, Angel Rodriguez, Paula Couto, Marc Rondy, Andrea Vicari
{"title":"A Comparative Analysis of Universal and Sentinel Surveillance Data for COVID-19: Insights from Argentina, Chile, and Mexico (2020–2022)","authors":"Lidia Redondo-Bravo, Kinda Zureick, Carla Jimena Voto, Xaviera Molina Avendaño, Laura Flores-Cisneros, Ashley Fowlkes, Luciana Eva Iummato, Carlos Maria Giovacchini, Maria Fernanda Olivares Barraza, Paula Rodriguez Ferrari, Rosaura Gutiérrez-Vargas, Christian Arturo Zaragoza-Jiménez, Gabriel García-Rodríguez, Hugo López-Gatell, Angel Rodriguez, Paula Couto, Marc Rondy, Andrea Vicari","doi":"10.1093/infdis/jiae620","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background In 2020, countries implemented universal surveillance to detect and monitor SARS-CoV-2 cases. Although crucial for early monitoring efforts, universal surveillance is resource intensive. To understand the implications of transitioning from universal to sentinel surveillance for monitoring SARS-CoV-2 transmissibility, morbidity and mortality, and disease seriousness, we compared measures of SARS-CoV-2 reported from both surveillance strategies in Argentina, Chile, and Mexico. Methods We obtained weekly case counts in Argentina, Chile, and Mexico, in periods when both universal and sentinel surveillance were ongoing. To assess the countries’ surveillance strategies, we measured the proportion of total sites that were included in sentinel surveillance. We compared eight measures of SARS-CoV-2 transmissibility, morbidity and mortality, and disease seriousness between sentinel and universal surveillance and assessed the correlation between the two strategies for the eight measures. Pearson's and Spearman's correlation was classified as very strong (r(s)=0.8–1.0), strong (r(s)=0.60–0.79), moderate (r(s)=0.50–0.59), or poor (r<0.50). Results The proportion of total sites included in sentinel surveillance was 5.8% for Argentina, 1.1% for Chile, and 7.6% for Mexico. A total of 21 measures were calculated (8 for Mexico, 8 for Chile, and 5 for Argentina). Of these, 17 showed consistency between the two surveillance strategies, with strong or very strong correlations (r=0.66–0.99): all 8 measures for Mexico, 6 of 8 measures for Chile, and 3 out of 5 measures for Argentina.. Each country had at least one measure reflecting transmissibility and at least one reflecting morbidity and mortality for which the correlation was strong or very strong. Chile and Mexico also had at least one measure of disease seriousness for which the correlation was strong. Conclusions Our findings suggest that the integration of SARS-CoV-2 into national sentinel surveillance can yield information comparable to that provided by nationwide universal surveillance for measures related to SARS-CoV-2 transmissibility, morbidity and mortality, and seriousness of disease.","PeriodicalId":501010,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Infectious Diseases","volume":"63 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiae620","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background In 2020, countries implemented universal surveillance to detect and monitor SARS-CoV-2 cases. Although crucial for early monitoring efforts, universal surveillance is resource intensive. To understand the implications of transitioning from universal to sentinel surveillance for monitoring SARS-CoV-2 transmissibility, morbidity and mortality, and disease seriousness, we compared measures of SARS-CoV-2 reported from both surveillance strategies in Argentina, Chile, and Mexico. Methods We obtained weekly case counts in Argentina, Chile, and Mexico, in periods when both universal and sentinel surveillance were ongoing. To assess the countries’ surveillance strategies, we measured the proportion of total sites that were included in sentinel surveillance. We compared eight measures of SARS-CoV-2 transmissibility, morbidity and mortality, and disease seriousness between sentinel and universal surveillance and assessed the correlation between the two strategies for the eight measures. Pearson's and Spearman's correlation was classified as very strong (r(s)=0.8–1.0), strong (r(s)=0.60–0.79), moderate (r(s)=0.50–0.59), or poor (r<0.50). Results The proportion of total sites included in sentinel surveillance was 5.8% for Argentina, 1.1% for Chile, and 7.6% for Mexico. A total of 21 measures were calculated (8 for Mexico, 8 for Chile, and 5 for Argentina). Of these, 17 showed consistency between the two surveillance strategies, with strong or very strong correlations (r=0.66–0.99): all 8 measures for Mexico, 6 of 8 measures for Chile, and 3 out of 5 measures for Argentina.. Each country had at least one measure reflecting transmissibility and at least one reflecting morbidity and mortality for which the correlation was strong or very strong. Chile and Mexico also had at least one measure of disease seriousness for which the correlation was strong. Conclusions Our findings suggest that the integration of SARS-CoV-2 into national sentinel surveillance can yield information comparable to that provided by nationwide universal surveillance for measures related to SARS-CoV-2 transmissibility, morbidity and mortality, and seriousness of disease.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19普遍监测和哨点监测数据的比较分析:来自阿根廷、智利和墨西哥的见解(2020-2022年)
2020年,各国实施了普遍监测,以发现和监测SARS-CoV-2病例。尽管对早期监测工作至关重要,但普遍监测需要大量资源。为了了解从普遍监测过渡到哨点监测以监测SARS-CoV-2的传播性、发病率和死亡率以及疾病严重程度的影响,我们比较了阿根廷、智利和墨西哥两种监测策略报告的SARS-CoV-2测量值。方法在阿根廷、智利和墨西哥进行普遍监测和哨点监测期间,我们获得每周病例数。为了评估各国的监测战略,我们测量了纳入哨点监测的总站点的比例。我们比较了哨点监测和普遍监测之间SARS-CoV-2传播率、发病率和死亡率以及疾病严重程度的八项指标,并评估了这八项指标的两种策略之间的相关性。Pearson和Spearman的相关性分为非常强(r(s)= 0.8-1.0)、强(r(s)= 0.60-0.79)、中等(r(s)=0.50 - 0.59)和差(r(s)=0.50)。结果阿根廷、智利和墨西哥被纳入哨点监测的站点比例分别为5.8%、1.1%和7.6%。总共计算了21个度量(墨西哥8个,智利8个,阿根廷5个)。其中,17项监测策略显示出两种监测策略之间的一致性,具有很强或非常强的相关性(r= 0.66-0.99):墨西哥的所有8项措施,智利的8项措施中的6项,阿根廷的5项措施中的3项。每个国家至少有一项反映传染性的措施,至少有一项反映相关性很强或非常强的发病率和死亡率的措施。智利和墨西哥也至少有一种疾病严重程度的测量方法与之有很强的相关性。我们的研究结果表明,将SARS-CoV-2纳入国家哨点监测可以获得与SARS-CoV-2传播性、发病率和死亡率以及疾病严重程度相关措施的全国普遍监测相当的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Natural History of Mycoplasma genitalium at the Pharynx and Rectum in a Cohort of Men who have Sex with Men: Prevalence, Incidence, Duration and Symptomatology. Why We Must Vaccinate US Dairy Cattle Against HPAI H5N1. Single-cell hepatitis B sequencing reveals distinct viral infection events consistent with superinfection. Can fluconazole be used to treat non-resistant Candida (Candidozyma) auris infections? Preclinical PK/PD data from a Galleria mellonella infection model. Genetic background modulates zoliflodacin and gepotidacin cross-resistance and fitness in Neisseria gonorrhoeae.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1