The influence of distributional fairness concern on quality co-creation mobile application supply chain: Exogenous and endogenous revenue-retaining mechanisms

IF 8.8 1区 工程技术 Q1 ECONOMICS Transportation Research Part E-Logistics and Transportation Review Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-26 DOI:10.1016/j.tre.2025.103966
Lulu Xia , Kai Li , Yu Xiong
{"title":"The influence of distributional fairness concern on quality co-creation mobile application supply chain: Exogenous and endogenous revenue-retaining mechanisms","authors":"Lulu Xia ,&nbsp;Kai Li ,&nbsp;Yu Xiong","doi":"10.1016/j.tre.2025.103966","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This research examines the quality co-creation practice in the mobile application supply chain composed of a mobile application developer and a mobile application distributor within a revenue-sharing framework. We analyze whether the distributional fairness concern of supply chain entities and the endogeneity or exogeneity of revenue-retaining ratio exert great influence on supply chain decisions and performance. Through analysis, we obtain following results. Firstly, the distributional fairness concern of supply chain entities drops down service price in both exogenous and endogenous revenue-retaining ratio contexts. Secondly, the developer’s emphasis on profit distribution fairness reduces service quality in the exogenous revenue-retaining context but enhances it in the endogenous revenue-retaining model. Thirdly, the developer achieves profit increment when he is the only one demonstrating distributional fairness concern but the distributor’s earnings shrink in his own distributional fairness concern situation. Finally, we derive in both exogenous and endogenous revenue-retaining contexts, the supply chain entities may simultaneously incorporate distributional fairness concern into internal decision making standards and fall into the prisoner’s dilemma. Additionally, we further explore three extended models: sequential strategic decision-making, considering the choice between exogenous and endogenous contracts, and bargaining over revenue-retaining ratio. Our findings demonstrate that, across all three extended models, supply chain entities may still fall into the prisoner’s dilemma.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49418,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part E-Logistics and Transportation Review","volume":"195 ","pages":"Article 103966"},"PeriodicalIF":8.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part E-Logistics and Transportation Review","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1366554525000079","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research examines the quality co-creation practice in the mobile application supply chain composed of a mobile application developer and a mobile application distributor within a revenue-sharing framework. We analyze whether the distributional fairness concern of supply chain entities and the endogeneity or exogeneity of revenue-retaining ratio exert great influence on supply chain decisions and performance. Through analysis, we obtain following results. Firstly, the distributional fairness concern of supply chain entities drops down service price in both exogenous and endogenous revenue-retaining ratio contexts. Secondly, the developer’s emphasis on profit distribution fairness reduces service quality in the exogenous revenue-retaining context but enhances it in the endogenous revenue-retaining model. Thirdly, the developer achieves profit increment when he is the only one demonstrating distributional fairness concern but the distributor’s earnings shrink in his own distributional fairness concern situation. Finally, we derive in both exogenous and endogenous revenue-retaining contexts, the supply chain entities may simultaneously incorporate distributional fairness concern into internal decision making standards and fall into the prisoner’s dilemma. Additionally, we further explore three extended models: sequential strategic decision-making, considering the choice between exogenous and endogenous contracts, and bargaining over revenue-retaining ratio. Our findings demonstrate that, across all three extended models, supply chain entities may still fall into the prisoner’s dilemma.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分配公平对优质共创移动应用供应链的影响:外生和内生的收益保持机制
本研究考察了收入共享框架下由移动应用开发者和移动应用分销商组成的移动应用供应链中的质量共同创造实践。分析了供应链主体的分配公平关注、收入保持率的内生性或外生性对供应链决策和绩效的影响。通过分析,我们得到以下结果:首先,在外生和内生收入保持比的情况下,供应链实体的分配公平考虑都降低了服务价格。其次,开发商对利润分配公平的重视降低了外生收益保持模式下的服务质量,但提高了内生收益保持模式下的服务质量。第三,当开发商是唯一关注分配公平的人,而分销商在自己关注分配公平的情况下收益减少时,开发商实现了利润增量。最后,我们推导出在外生和内生收益保留环境下,供应链实体可能同时将分配公平考虑纳入内部决策标准,从而陷入囚徒困境。此外,我们进一步探讨了三个扩展模型:顺序战略决策、考虑外生和内生合同的选择以及收入保留率的讨价还价。我们的研究结果表明,在所有三种扩展模型中,供应链实体仍可能陷入囚徒困境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.20
自引率
16.00%
发文量
285
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review is a reputable journal that publishes high-quality articles covering a wide range of topics in the field of logistics and transportation research. The journal welcomes submissions on various subjects, including transport economics, transport infrastructure and investment appraisal, evaluation of public policies related to transportation, empirical and analytical studies of logistics management practices and performance, logistics and operations models, and logistics and supply chain management. Part E aims to provide informative and well-researched articles that contribute to the understanding and advancement of the field. The content of the journal is complementary to other prestigious journals in transportation research, such as Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Part B: Methodological, Part C: Emerging Technologies, Part D: Transport and Environment, and Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. Together, these journals form a comprehensive and cohesive reference for current research in transportation science.
期刊最新文献
A predict-then-optimize framework for port state control officer routing Financing contract design under information asymmetry in production and logistics: Separated financing or integrated financing Blockchain-enabled traceability and visibility: Financing for a capital-constrained recycler in closed-loop supply chain Direct-to-consumer firms’ competitive strategy against a dominant retailer: Opening an experiential physical store vs. specializing in an online store Honoring Dr. Wayne K. Talley (1942–2025): overview of a dedicated lifetime of research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1